From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@intel.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 2/5] perf x86/topdown: Correct leader selection with sample_read enabled
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 10:42:53 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZroRXXlV-ePkj-On@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240712170339.185824-3-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 05:03:36PM +0000, Dapeng Mi wrote:
> Addresses an issue where, in the absence of a topdown metrics event
> within a sampling group, the slots event was incorrectly bypassed as
> the sampling leader when sample_read was enabled.
>
> perf record -e '{slots,branches}:S' -c 10000 -vv sleep 1
Kan, can you please take a look at this patch and the others in this
series?
Thanks,
- Arnaldo
> In this case, the slots event should be sampled as leader but the
> branches event is sampled in fact like the verbose output shows.
>
> perf_event_attr:
> type 4 (cpu)
> size 168
> config 0x400 (slots)
> sample_type IP|TID|TIME|READ|CPU|IDENTIFIER
> read_format ID|GROUP|LOST
> disabled 1
> sample_id_all 1
> exclude_guest 1
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> sys_perf_event_open: pid -1 cpu 0 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 5
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> perf_event_attr:
> type 0 (PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE)
> size 168
> config 0x4 (PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS)
> { sample_period, sample_freq } 10000
> sample_type IP|TID|TIME|READ|CPU|IDENTIFIER
> read_format ID|GROUP|LOST
> sample_id_all 1
> exclude_guest 1
>
> The sample period of slots event instead of branches event is reset to
> 0.
>
> This fix ensures the slots event remains the leader under these
> conditions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c
> index 49f25d67ed77..857e00cf579f 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> #include "api/fs/fs.h"
> #include "util/evsel.h"
> +#include "util/evlist.h"
> #include "util/pmu.h"
> #include "util/pmus.h"
> #include "util/topdown.h"
> @@ -87,11 +88,22 @@ bool arch_is_topdown_metrics(const struct evsel *evsel)
> */
> bool arch_topdown_sample_read(struct evsel *leader)
> {
> + struct evsel *evsel;
> +
> if (!evsel__sys_has_perf_metrics(leader))
> return false;
>
> - if (arch_is_topdown_slots(leader))
> - return true;
> + if (!arch_is_topdown_slots(leader))
> + return false;
> +
> + /*
> + * If slots event as leader event but no topdown metric events
> + * in group, slots event should still sample as leader.
> + */
> + evlist__for_each_entry(leader->evlist, evsel) {
> + if (evsel != leader && arch_is_topdown_metrics(evsel))
> + return true;
> + }
>
> return false;
> }
> --
> 2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-12 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-12 17:03 [Patch v3 0/5] Bug fixes on topdown events reordering Dapeng Mi
2024-07-12 17:03 ` [Patch v3 1/5] perf x86/topdown: Complete topdown slots/metrics events check Dapeng Mi
2024-08-12 13:41 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-08-13 6:54 ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-08-15 6:42 ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-07-12 17:03 ` [Patch v3 2/5] perf x86/topdown: Correct leader selection with sample_read enabled Dapeng Mi
2024-08-12 13:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2024-08-12 14:37 ` Liang, Kan
2024-08-12 15:18 ` Liang, Kan
2024-08-13 7:15 ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-07-12 17:03 ` [Patch v3 3/5] perf x86/topdown: Don't move topdown metric events in group Dapeng Mi
2024-08-12 15:37 ` Liang, Kan
2024-08-13 7:30 ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-07-12 17:03 ` [Patch v3 4/5] perf tests: Add leader sampling test in record tests Dapeng Mi
2024-07-12 17:03 ` [Patch v3 5/5] perf tests: Add topdown events counting and sampling tests Dapeng Mi
2024-08-12 5:43 ` [Patch v3 0/5] Bug fixes on topdown events reordering Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZroRXXlV-ePkj-On@x1 \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yongwei.ma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).