From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf annotate-data: Set bitfield member offset and size properly
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 17:42:28 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZsT_tHyuwb8L3KVB@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240815223823.2402285-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 03:38:23PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> The bitfield members might not have DW_AT_data_member_location. Let's
> use DW_AT_data_bit_offset to set the member offset correct. Also use
> DW_AT_bit_size for the name like in a C program.
Thanks, applied and added the series of steps to reproduce your results:
Commiter notes:
Collect some data:
root@number:~# perf mem record -a --ldlat 5 -- ping -s 8193 -f 192.168.86.1
Memory events are enabled on a subset of CPUs: 16-27
PING 192.168.86.1 (192.168.86.1) 8193(8221) bytes of data.
.^C
--- 192.168.86.1 ping statistics ---
13881 packets transmitted, 13880 received, 0.00720409% packet loss, time 8664ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.510/0.599/7.768/0.115 ms, ipg/ewma 0.624/0.593 ms
[ perf record: Woken up 8 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 14.877 MB perf.data (46785 samples) ]
root@number:~#
root@number:~# perf evlist
cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=5/P
cpu_atom/mem-stores/P
dummy:u
root@number:~# perf evlist -v
cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=5/P: type: 10 (cpu_atom), size: 136, config: 0x5d0 (mem-loads), { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|CPU|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format: ID|LOST, disabled: 1, inherit: 1, freq: 1, precise_ip: 3, sample_id_all: 1, { bp_addr, config1 }: 0x7
cpu_atom/mem-stores/P: type: 10 (cpu_atom), size: 136, config: 0x6d0 (mem-stores), { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|CPU|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format: ID|LOST, disabled: 1, inherit: 1, freq: 1, precise_ip: 3, sample_id_all: 1
dummy:u: type: 1 (software), size: 136, config: 0x9 (PERF_COUNT_SW_DUMMY), { sample_period, sample_freq }: 1, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|CPU|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format: ID|LOST, inherit: 1, exclude_kernel: 1, exclude_hv: 1, mmap: 1, comm: 1, task: 1, mmap_data: 1, sample_id_all: 1, exclude_guest: 1, mmap2: 1, comm_exec: 1, ksymbol: 1, bpf_event: 1
root@number:~#
Ok, now lets see what changes from before this patch to after it:
root@number:~# perf annotate --data-type > /tmp/before
Apply the patch, build:
root@number:~# perf annotate --data-type > /tmp/after
The first hunk of the diff, for a glib data structure, in userspace,
look at those bitfields:
root@number:~# diff -u10 /tmp/before /tmp/after | head -20
--- /tmp/before 2024-08-20 17:29:58.306765780 -0300
+++ /tmp/after 2024-08-20 17:33:13.210582596 -0300
@@ -163,22 +163,22 @@
Annotate type: 'GHashTable' in /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0.8000.3 (1 samples):
============================================================================
Percent offset size field
100.00 0 96 GHashTable {
0.00 0 8 gsize size;
0.00 8 4 gint mod;
100.00 12 4 guint mask;
0.00 16 4 guint nnodes;
0.00 20 4 guint noccupied;
- 0.00 0 4 guint have_big_keys;
- 0.00 0 4 guint have_big_values;
+ 0.00 24 1 guint have_big_keys:1;
+ 0.00 24 1 guint have_big_values:1;
0.00 32 8 gpointer keys;
0.00 40 8 guint* hashes;
0.00 48 8 gpointer values;
root@number:~#
As advertised :-)
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-20 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-15 22:38 [PATCH] perf annotate-data: Set bitfield member offset and size properly Namhyung Kim
2024-08-20 20:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-08-13 3:08 Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZsT_tHyuwb8L3KVB@x1 \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).