linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
	Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>,
	Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
	Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] perf tools: Check fallback error and order
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 11:15:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ztij2o6O9jbAdMiJ@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fWnAwVumJgypta=RJV4JBN7A82bn4aUuNJX4G3Xi0zfhg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 09:19:25AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 11:41 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > The perf_event_open might fail due to various reasons, so blindly
> > reducing precise_ip level might not be the best way to deal with it.
> >
> > It seems the kernel return -EOPNOTSUPP when PMU doesn't support the
> > given precise level.  Let's try again with the correct error code.
> 
> We also have pmu's max_precise:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git/tree/tools/perf/util/pmu.h?h=perf-tools-next#n91
> The reducing the precision approach was iirc taken for AMD who will
> forward some precise events to IBS, but the max_precise on the cpu PMU
> is 0. I think because of this, reducing the precision below
> evsel->pmu->max_precise shouldn't be necessary and another fallback
> may help better.

Internally IBS has max_precise of 2 and I think it should have that in
the sysfs.

But I found a problem with this code.  Now cycles:P would stop at 2
because after that it won't return EOPNOTSUPP.  Instead, it returns
EINVAL because of exclude_kernel and PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE.

Maybe we need something like this.. :(

Thanks,
Namhyung


diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
index 0133c9ad3ce07a24..6157dc68044eb389 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
@@ -2587,6 +2587,13 @@ static int evsel__open_cpu(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus,
        if (err == -EINVAL && evsel__detect_missing_features(evsel))
                goto fallback_missing_features;
 
+       /* HACK: AMD IBS doesn't accept exclude_*, forwarding it back to core PMU */
+       if (err == -EINVAL && evsel->precise_max && evsel->core.attr.precise_ip &&
+                       evsel->core.attr.exclude_kernel) {
+               evsel->core.attr.precise_ip = 0;
+               goto fallback_missing_features;
+       }
+
 out_close:
        if (err)
                threads->err_thread = thread;

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-04 18:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-04  6:41 [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf tools: Do not set attr.exclude_guest by default (v2) Namhyung Kim
2024-09-04  6:41 ` [PATCH 1/8] perf tools: Don't set attr.exclude_guest by default Namhyung Kim
2024-09-04 13:07   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-09-04 15:43     ` Namhyung Kim
2024-09-04  6:41 ` [PATCH 2/8] perf tools: Simplify evsel__add_modifier() Namhyung Kim
2024-09-04  6:41 ` [PATCH 3/8] perf stat: Add --exclude-guest option Namhyung Kim
2024-09-04  6:41 ` [PATCH 4/8] perf tools: Do not set exclude_guest for precise_ip Namhyung Kim
2024-09-04  6:41 ` [PATCH 5/8] perf tools: Detect missing kernel features properly Namhyung Kim
2024-09-04  6:41 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf tools: Separate exclude_hv fallback Namhyung Kim
2024-09-04  6:41 ` [PATCH 7/8] perf tools: Add fallback for exclude_guest Namhyung Kim
2024-09-04 13:28   ` James Clark
2024-09-04 13:29     ` James Clark
2024-09-04 13:36     ` James Clark
2024-09-04 15:52       ` Namhyung Kim
2024-09-04  6:41 ` [PATCH 8/8] perf tools: Check fallback error and order Namhyung Kim
2024-09-04 16:19   ` Ian Rogers
2024-09-04 18:15     ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2024-09-04 16:36 ` [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf tools: Do not set attr.exclude_guest by default (v2) Ian Rogers
2024-09-04 17:46   ` Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Ztij2o6O9jbAdMiJ@google.com \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
    --cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).