From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
acme@kernel.org, agordeev@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
sumanthk@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/test: perf test 86 fails on s390 repo linux-next
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 16:26:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZvsztS6wMMFuXjSz@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b65e3cc-2a9f-4427-a327-7e920ec4d969@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 02:30:39PM +0200, Thomas Richter wrote:
> On 9/27/24 00:42, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 02:57:18PM +0200, Thomas Richter wrote:
> >> Command perf test 86 fails on s390 using linux-next repository:
> >> # perf test -F 86
> >> ping 868299 [007] 28248.013596: probe_libc:inet_pton_1: (3ff95948020)
> >> 3ff95948020 inet_pton+0x0 (inlined)
> >> 3ff9595e6e7 text_to_binary_address+0x1007 (inlined)
> >> 3ff9595e6e7 gaih_inet+0x1007 (inlined)
> >> FAIL: expected backtrace entry \
> >> "main\+0x[[:xdigit:]]+[[:space:]]\(.*/bin/ping.*\)$"
> >> got "3ff9595e6e7 gaih_inet+0x1007 (inlined)"
> >> 86: probe libc's inet_pton & backtrace it with ping : FAILED!
> >> #
> >>
> >> The root cause is a new stack layout, some functions have been added
> >> as seen below. Add text_to_binary_address and friends to the
> >> list of expected functions.
> >>
> >> # perf script | tac | grep -m1 '^ping' -B9 | tac
> >> ping 866856 [007] 25979.494921: probe_libc:inet_pton: (3ff8ec48020)
> >> 3ff8ec48020 inet_pton+0x0 (inlined)
> >> 3ff8ec5e6e7 text_to_binary_address+0x1007 (inlined)
> >> 3ff8ec5e6e7 gaih_inet+0x1007 (inlined)
> >> 3ff8ec5e6e7 getaddrinfo+0x1007 (/usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
> >> 2aa3fe04bf5 main+0xff5 (/usr/bin/ping)
> >> 3ff8eb34a5b __libc_start_call_main+0x8b (/usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
> >> 3ff8eb34b5d __libc_start_main@GLIBC_2.2+0xad (inlined)
> >> 2aa3fe06a1f [unknown] (/usr/bin/ping)
> >
> > Is it because of a kernel change? What about old kernels then?
> >
> >>
> >> #
> >>
> >> Output after:
> >> # perf test -F 86
> >> 86: probe libc's inet_pton & backtrace it with ping : Ok
> >> #
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >> tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh | 2 ++
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh
> >> index f38c8ead0b03..bc6e2fe1d999 100755
> >> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh
> >> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh
> >> @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ trace_libc_inet_pton_backtrace() {
> >> case "$(uname -m)" in
> >> s390x)
> >> eventattr='call-graph=dwarf,max-stack=4'
> >> + echo "text_to_binary_address\+0x[[:xdigit:]]+[[:space:]]\($libc|inlined\)$" >> $expected
> >> + echo "gaih_inet\+0x[[:xdigit:]]+[[:space:]]\($libc|inlined\)$" >> $expected
> >
> > Is it possible to make it this part conditional and only have it for the
> > new kernels?
>
> I think this is more related to glibc and has nothing to do with the kernel version.
> It happened after I did a dnf update.
Ok, then I'm afraid fixing this would break others with old glibc.
Can you please update the regex to cover both cases?
Thanks,
Namhyung
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-30 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-16 12:57 [PATCH] perf/test: perf test 86 fails on s390 repo linux-next Thomas Richter
2024-09-26 22:42 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-09-30 12:30 ` Thomas Richter
2024-09-30 23:26 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZvsztS6wMMFuXjSz@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sumanthk@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).