* [PATCH] perf test: Fix perf test case 84 on s390
@ 2024-10-15 7:47 Thomas Richter
2024-10-17 20:28 ` Namhyung Kim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Richter @ 2024-10-15 7:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, acme, namhyung
Cc: agordeev, gor, sumanthk, hca, Thomas Richter
Perf test case 84 'perf pipe recording and injection test'
sometime fails on s390, especially on z/VM virtual machines.
This is caused by a very short run time of workload
# perf test -w noploop
which runs for 1 second. Occasionally this is not long
enough and the perf report has no samples for symbol noploop.
Fix this and enlarge the runtime for the perf work load
to 3 seconds. This ensures the symbol noploop is always
present.
Output before:
Inject -b build-ids test
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.195 MB - ]
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.277 MB - ]
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.195 MB - ]
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.160 MB
/tmp/perf.data.ELzRdq (4031 samples) ]
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.195 MB - ]
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.195 MB - ]
Inject -b build-ids test [Success]
Inject --buildid-all build-ids test
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.195 MB - ]
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.014 MB - ]
Inject --buildid-all build-ids test [Failed - cannot find
noploop function in pipe #2]
Output after:
Successful execution for over 10 times in a loop.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
---
tools/perf/tests/shell/pipe_test.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/pipe_test.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/pipe_test.sh
index d4c8005ce9b9..02d9ef27c8e7 100755
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/pipe_test.sh
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/pipe_test.sh
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ skip_test_missing_symbol ${sym}
data=$(mktemp /tmp/perf.data.XXXXXX)
data2=$(mktemp /tmp/perf.data2.XXXXXX)
-prog="perf test -w noploop"
+prog="perf test -w noploop 3"
err=0
set -e
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf test: Fix perf test case 84 on s390
2024-10-15 7:47 [PATCH] perf test: Fix perf test case 84 on s390 Thomas Richter
@ 2024-10-17 20:28 ` Namhyung Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2024-10-17 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Richter
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, acme, agordeev, gor, sumanthk,
hca
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 09:47:26AM +0200, Thomas Richter wrote:
> Perf test case 84 'perf pipe recording and injection test'
> sometime fails on s390, especially on z/VM virtual machines.
>
> This is caused by a very short run time of workload
>
> # perf test -w noploop
>
> which runs for 1 second. Occasionally this is not long
> enough and the perf report has no samples for symbol noploop.
>
> Fix this and enlarge the runtime for the perf work load
> to 3 seconds. This ensures the symbol noploop is always
> present.
Hmm.. but it would slow down the test quite a lot. Can you please make
it conditional on s390 or something?
Maybe you could add a fallback logic to increase the period if it fails.
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> Output before:
> Inject -b build-ids test
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.195 MB - ]
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.277 MB - ]
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.195 MB - ]
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.160 MB
> /tmp/perf.data.ELzRdq (4031 samples) ]
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.195 MB - ]
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.195 MB - ]
> Inject -b build-ids test [Success]
>
> Inject --buildid-all build-ids test
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.195 MB - ]
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.014 MB - ]
> Inject --buildid-all build-ids test [Failed - cannot find
> noploop function in pipe #2]
>
> Output after:
> Successful execution for over 10 times in a loop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/shell/pipe_test.sh | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/pipe_test.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/pipe_test.sh
> index d4c8005ce9b9..02d9ef27c8e7 100755
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/pipe_test.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/pipe_test.sh
> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ skip_test_missing_symbol ${sym}
>
> data=$(mktemp /tmp/perf.data.XXXXXX)
> data2=$(mktemp /tmp/perf.data2.XXXXXX)
> -prog="perf test -w noploop"
> +prog="perf test -w noploop 3"
> err=0
>
> set -e
> --
> 2.47.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] perf test: Fix perf test case 84 on s390
@ 2024-10-18 8:16 Thomas Richter
2024-10-18 16:11 ` Ian Rogers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Richter @ 2024-10-18 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, acme, namhyung
Cc: agordeev, gor, sumanthk, hca, Thomas Richter
Perf test case 84 'perf pipe recording and injection test'
sometime fails on s390, especially on z/VM virtual machines.
This is caused by a very short run time of workload
# perf test -w noploop
which runs for 1 second. Occasionally this is not long
enough and the perf report has no samples for symbol noploop.
Fix this and enlarge the runtime for the perf work load
to 3 seconds. This ensures the symbol noploop is always
present. Since only s390 is affected, make this loop
architecture dependend.
Output before:
Inject -b build-ids test
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.195 MB - ]
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.277 MB - ]
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.195 MB - ]
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.160 MB
/tmp/perf.data.ELzRdq (4031 samples) ]
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.195 MB - ]
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.195 MB - ]
Inject -b build-ids test [Success]
Inject --buildid-all build-ids test
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.195 MB - ]
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.014 MB - ]
Inject --buildid-all build-ids test [Failed - cannot find
noploop function in pipe #2]
Output after:
Successful execution for over 10 times in a loop.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
tools/perf/tests/shell/pipe_test.sh | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/pipe_test.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/pipe_test.sh
index d4c8005ce9b9..e459aa99a951 100755
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/pipe_test.sh
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/pipe_test.sh
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ skip_test_missing_symbol ${sym}
data=$(mktemp /tmp/perf.data.XXXXXX)
data2=$(mktemp /tmp/perf.data2.XXXXXX)
prog="perf test -w noploop"
+[ "$(uname -m)" = "s390x" ] && prog="$prog 3"
err=0
set -e
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf test: Fix perf test case 84 on s390
2024-10-18 8:16 Thomas Richter
@ 2024-10-18 16:11 ` Ian Rogers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ian Rogers @ 2024-10-18 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Richter
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, acme, namhyung, agordeev, gor,
sumanthk, hca
On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 1:17 AM Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Perf test case 84 'perf pipe recording and injection test'
> sometime fails on s390, especially on z/VM virtual machines.
>
> This is caused by a very short run time of workload
>
> # perf test -w noploop
>
> which runs for 1 second. Occasionally this is not long
> enough and the perf report has no samples for symbol noploop.
>
> Fix this and enlarge the runtime for the perf work load
> to 3 seconds. This ensures the symbol noploop is always
> present. Since only s390 is affected, make this loop
> architecture dependend.
>
> Output before:
> Inject -b build-ids test
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.195 MB - ]
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.277 MB - ]
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.195 MB - ]
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.160 MB
> /tmp/perf.data.ELzRdq (4031 samples) ]
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.195 MB - ]
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.195 MB - ]
> Inject -b build-ids test [Success]
>
> Inject --buildid-all build-ids test
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.195 MB - ]
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.014 MB - ]
> Inject --buildid-all build-ids test [Failed - cannot find
> noploop function in pipe #2]
>
> Output after:
> Successful execution for over 10 times in a loop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
> Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Lgtm, fwiw if we can land the parallel testing [1] I'm not sure it
matters if a test takes 3 seconds to run as long as it is running
amongst the concurrently running tests.
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Thanks,
Ian
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241018054719.1004128-1-irogers@google.com/
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/shell/pipe_test.sh | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/pipe_test.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/pipe_test.sh
> index d4c8005ce9b9..e459aa99a951 100755
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/pipe_test.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/pipe_test.sh
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ skip_test_missing_symbol ${sym}
> data=$(mktemp /tmp/perf.data.XXXXXX)
> data2=$(mktemp /tmp/perf.data2.XXXXXX)
> prog="perf test -w noploop"
> +[ "$(uname -m)" = "s390x" ] && prog="$prog 3"
> err=0
>
> set -e
> --
> 2.47.0
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-10-18 16:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-10-15 7:47 [PATCH] perf test: Fix perf test case 84 on s390 Thomas Richter
2024-10-17 20:28 ` Namhyung Kim
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-10-18 8:16 Thomas Richter
2024-10-18 16:11 ` Ian Rogers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).