From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Howard Chu <howardchu95@gmail.com>,
Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>,
Veronika Molnarova <vmolnaro@redhat.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>,
Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Run tests in parallel showing number of tests running
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 16:28:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZxGdtB-jQCptIiui@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fXaiZS3sUctP9K=h5cgaL1dFsuWbhhJFfM4=Avg+xduPw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 05:49:12AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 5:28 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 4:49 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 03:03:46PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > > > Avoid waitpid so that stdout/stderr aren't destroyed prior to wanting
> > > > to read them for display. When running on a color terminal, display
> > > > the number of running tests (1 if sequential). To avoid previous
> > > > flicker, only delete and refresh the display line when it changes. An
> > > > earlier version of this code is here:
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240701044236.475098-1-irogers@google.com/
> > > >
> > > > Add a signal handler for perf tests so that unexpected signals are
> > > > displayed and test clean up is possible.
> > > >
> > > > In perf test add an "exclusive" flag that causes a test to be run with
> > > > no other test. Set this flag manually for C tests and via a
> > > > "(exclusive)" in the test description for shell tests. Add the flag to
> > > > shell tests that may fail when run with other tests.
> > > >
> > > > Change the perf test loop to run in two passes. For parallel
> > > > execution, the first pass runs all tests that can be run in parallel
> > > > then the 2nd runs remaining tests sequentially. This causes the
> > > > "exclusive" tests to be run last and with test numbers moderately out
> > > > of alignment.
> > > >
> > > > Change the default to be to run tests in parallel. Running tests in
> > > > parallel brings the execution time down to less than half.
> > > >
> > > > v2: Fix inaccurate remaining counts when running specific
> > > > tests. Rename "remaining" to "active" to better reflect the
> > > > testing behavior. Move the exclusive flag to test cases and not
> > > > entire suites. Add more "(exclusive)" flags to test as
> > > > suggested-by James Clark. Remove "(exclusive)" flag from test
> > > > descriptions to keep the command line output more concise. Add
> > > > James Clark's tested-by.
> > > >
> > > > Ian Rogers (8):
> > > > tools subcmd: Add non-waitpid check_if_command_finished()
> > > > perf test: Display number of active running tests
> > > > perf test: Reduce scope of parallel variable
> > > > perf test: Avoid list test blocking on writing to stdout
> > > > perf test: Tag parallel failing shell tests with "(exclusive)"
> > > > perf test: Add a signal handler around running a test
> > > > perf test: Run parallel tests in two passes
> > > > perf test: Make parallel testing the default
> > >
> > > Nice work! It looks much better now.
> > >
> > > But I'm seeing more failures in parallel mode. Maybe we want to
> > > keep the default serial mode for a little more.
> >
> > As you say, I think we should be conservative and mark all tests that
> > need to serial/sequential/exclusive with the exclusive tag. If you
> > tell me the failing tests I can add them to 'perf test: Tag parallel
> > failing shell tests with "(exclusive)"' as I did for James Clark with
> > the ARM tests. I'd prefer we did the tagging rather than not enabling
> > parallel testing as otherwise I may never learn which tests fail for
> > people when run in parallel.
>
> With repeat testing, most often for me it was fine, I was able to get
> a flake on the probe plus vfs_getname tests like:
> ```
> $ sudo /tmp/perf/perf test vfs -v
> 91: Add vfs_getname probe to get syscall args filenames : Ok
> --- start ---
> test child forked, pid 466904
> Failed to write event: File exists
> Error: Failed to add events.
> ---- end(-1) ----
> 93: Use vfs_getname probe to get syscall args filenames : FAILED!
> --- start ---
> test child forked, pid 466906
> Error: event "vfs_getname" already exists.
> Hint: Remove existing event by 'perf probe -d'
> or force duplicates by 'perf probe -f'
> or set 'force=yes' in BPF source.
> Error: Failed to add events.
> ---- end(-1) ----
> 127: Check open filename arg using perf trace + vfs_getname : FAILED!
> ```
> So I'll make those exclusive in v2 too. If you could let me know of others.
Mine is the below (other than the existing probe test failure). I ran
them 3 times and picked one failed at least once.
92: Add vfs_getname probe to get syscall args filenames : FAILED!
94: Use vfs_getname probe to get syscall args filenames : FAILED!
112: perf stat --bpf-counters test : FAILED!
121: Test data symbol : FAILED!
128: Check open filename arg using perf trace + vfs_getname : FAILED!
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> > > >
> > > > tools/lib/subcmd/run-command.c | 33 +++
> > > > tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c | 274 ++++++++++++------
> > > > .../tests/shell/coresight/asm_pure_loop.sh | 2 +-
> > > > .../shell/coresight/memcpy_thread_16k_10.sh | 2 +-
> > > > .../coresight/thread_loop_check_tid_10.sh | 2 +-
> > > > .../coresight/thread_loop_check_tid_2.sh | 2 +-
> > > > .../shell/coresight/unroll_loop_thread_10.sh | 2 +-
> > > > tools/perf/tests/shell/list.sh | 5 +-
> > > > .../tests/shell/perftool-testsuite_report.sh | 2 +-
> > > > tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh | 2 +-
> > > > tools/perf/tests/shell/record_lbr.sh | 2 +-
> > > > tools/perf/tests/shell/record_offcpu.sh | 2 +-
> > > > tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh | 2 +-
> > > > tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_coresight.sh | 2 +-
> > > > .../tests/shell/test_arm_coresight_disasm.sh | 2 +-
> > > > tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh | 2 +-
> > > > tools/perf/tests/shell/test_intel_pt.sh | 2 +-
> > > > .../perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh | 2 +-
> > > > tools/perf/tests/task-exit.c | 9 +-
> > > > tools/perf/tests/tests-scripts.c | 7 +-
> > > > tools/perf/tests/tests.h | 9 +
> > > > tools/perf/util/color.h | 1 +
> > > > 22 files changed, 258 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.47.0.rc1.288.g06298d1525-goog
> > > >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-17 23:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-11 22:03 [PATCH v2 0/8] Run tests in parallel showing number of tests running Ian Rogers
2024-10-11 22:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] tools subcmd: Add non-waitpid check_if_command_finished() Ian Rogers
2024-10-11 22:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] perf test: Display number of active running tests Ian Rogers
2024-10-11 22:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] perf test: Reduce scope of parallel variable Ian Rogers
2024-10-11 22:03 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] perf test: Avoid list test blocking on writing to stdout Ian Rogers
2024-10-11 22:03 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] perf test: Tag parallel failing shell tests with "(exclusive)" Ian Rogers
2024-10-11 22:03 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] perf test: Add a signal handler around running a test Ian Rogers
2024-10-11 22:03 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] perf test: Run parallel tests in two passes Ian Rogers
2024-10-11 22:03 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] perf test: Make parallel testing the default Ian Rogers
2024-10-16 23:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] Run tests in parallel showing number of tests running Namhyung Kim
2024-10-17 0:28 ` Ian Rogers
2024-10-17 12:49 ` Ian Rogers
2024-10-17 23:28 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZxGdtB-jQCptIiui@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=colin.i.king@gmail.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=howardchu95@gmail.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpetlan@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vmolnaro@redhat.com \
--cc=weilin.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).