linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: vmolnaro@redhat.com
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, mpetlan@redhat.com,
	kan.liang@linux.intel.com, irogers@google.com, acme@redhat.com,
	ak@linux.intel.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: perf sched timehist --state vs perf script
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 17:34:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyF_JDYF4wgEmbrW@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241024163630.24882-1-vmolnaro@redhat.com>

On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 06:36:30PM +0200, vmolnaro@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Veronika Molnarova <vmolnaro@redhat.com>
> 
> Hello!
> 
> We encountered an issue with 'perf sched timehist --state' when
> we expected for a test case that the process of a workload would 
> eventually end in the dead state(marked by 'X') and be switched
> out. This can be seen also by using 'perf script':
> 
>     # perf sched record -a sleep 1
>     [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
>     [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.167 MB perf.data (166 samples) ]
>     # perf script | grep sleep
>            sleep  151541 [000] 193461.410617: sched:sched_stat_runtime: comm=sleep pid=151541 runtime=3132275 [ns]
>            sleep  151541 [000] 193461.410624:       sched:sched_switch: sleep:151541 [120] S ==> swapper/0:0 [120]
>          swapper       0 [000] 193462.410688:       sched:sched_waking: comm=sleep pid=151541 prio=120 target_cpu=000
>          swapper       0 [000] 193462.410698:       sched:sched_switch: swapper/0:0 [120] R ==> sleep:151541 [120]
>          :151541  151541 [000] 193462.411100: sched:sched_stat_runtime: comm=sleep pid=151541 runtime=407210 [ns]
>          :151541  151541 [000] 193462.411107:       sched:sched_switch: sleep:151541 [120] X ==> swapper/0:0 [120]
> 
> But for the 'perf sched timehist --state' the process is shown
> in the zombie state when it is being switched out:
> 
>     # perf sched timehist --state | grep 151541
>     Samples do not have callchains.
>       193461.410624 [0000]  sleep[151541]                       0.000      0.054      3.129      S 
>       193462.411107 [0000]  :151541[151541]                     0.000      0.000      0.408      Z 
> 
> Shouldn't both commands report the same result, or is there a reason
> why 'perf script' uses the dead state while 'perf sched' uses dead?

I remember there was a discussion related to this.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240122070859.1394479-2-zegao@tencent.com/

And it seems it's fixed both in perf and libtraceevent.  Maybe your
libtraceevent is somewhat outdated and doesn't have the update.

> It also seems that the 'perf sched' cannot read the name of the zombie
> process, but that can be a different issue.

Hmm.. right.  It should update thread->comm using the sched_switch event.

Thanks,
Namhyung


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-30  0:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-24 16:36 perf sched timehist --state vs perf script vmolnaro
2024-10-30  0:34 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2024-10-31 11:32   ` Michael Petlan
2024-11-02  6:20     ` Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZyF_JDYF4wgEmbrW@google.com \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpetlan@redhat.com \
    --cc=vmolnaro@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).