From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: vmolnaro@redhat.com
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, mpetlan@redhat.com,
kan.liang@linux.intel.com, irogers@google.com, acme@redhat.com,
ak@linux.intel.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: perf sched timehist --state vs perf script
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 17:34:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyF_JDYF4wgEmbrW@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241024163630.24882-1-vmolnaro@redhat.com>
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 06:36:30PM +0200, vmolnaro@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Veronika Molnarova <vmolnaro@redhat.com>
>
> Hello!
>
> We encountered an issue with 'perf sched timehist --state' when
> we expected for a test case that the process of a workload would
> eventually end in the dead state(marked by 'X') and be switched
> out. This can be seen also by using 'perf script':
>
> # perf sched record -a sleep 1
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.167 MB perf.data (166 samples) ]
> # perf script | grep sleep
> sleep 151541 [000] 193461.410617: sched:sched_stat_runtime: comm=sleep pid=151541 runtime=3132275 [ns]
> sleep 151541 [000] 193461.410624: sched:sched_switch: sleep:151541 [120] S ==> swapper/0:0 [120]
> swapper 0 [000] 193462.410688: sched:sched_waking: comm=sleep pid=151541 prio=120 target_cpu=000
> swapper 0 [000] 193462.410698: sched:sched_switch: swapper/0:0 [120] R ==> sleep:151541 [120]
> :151541 151541 [000] 193462.411100: sched:sched_stat_runtime: comm=sleep pid=151541 runtime=407210 [ns]
> :151541 151541 [000] 193462.411107: sched:sched_switch: sleep:151541 [120] X ==> swapper/0:0 [120]
>
> But for the 'perf sched timehist --state' the process is shown
> in the zombie state when it is being switched out:
>
> # perf sched timehist --state | grep 151541
> Samples do not have callchains.
> 193461.410624 [0000] sleep[151541] 0.000 0.054 3.129 S
> 193462.411107 [0000] :151541[151541] 0.000 0.000 0.408 Z
>
> Shouldn't both commands report the same result, or is there a reason
> why 'perf script' uses the dead state while 'perf sched' uses dead?
I remember there was a discussion related to this.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240122070859.1394479-2-zegao@tencent.com/
And it seems it's fixed both in perf and libtraceevent. Maybe your
libtraceevent is somewhat outdated and doesn't have the update.
> It also seems that the 'perf sched' cannot read the name of the zombie
> process, but that can be a different issue.
Hmm.. right. It should update thread->comm using the sched_switch event.
Thanks,
Namhyung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-30 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-24 16:36 perf sched timehist --state vs perf script vmolnaro
2024-10-30 0:34 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2024-10-31 11:32 ` Michael Petlan
2024-11-02 6:20 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZyF_JDYF4wgEmbrW@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpetlan@redhat.com \
--cc=vmolnaro@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).