From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>,
Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 7/7] arm64: kgdb: Roundup cpus using the debug IPI
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 11:47:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a030019c7c5887d54b97054ed7d9af12@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZNDHZLGds0DTN6zg@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com>
On 2023-08-07 11:28, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 02:31:51PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
>> From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
>>
>> Let's use the debug IPI for rounding up CPUs in kgdb. When the debug
>> IPI is backed by an NMI (or pseudo NMI) then this will let us debug
>> even hard locked CPUs. When the debug IPI isn't backed by an NMI then
>> this won't really have any huge benefit but it will still work.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v9:
>> - Remove fallback for when debug IPI isn't available.
>> - Renamed "NMI IPI" to "debug IPI" since it might not be backed by
>> NMI.
>>
>> arch/arm64/kernel/ipi_debug.c | 5 +++++
>> arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> This looks fine to me, but I'd feel a bit happier if we had separate
> SGIs for
> the backtrace and the KGDB callback as they're logically unrelated.
Well, we're a bit stuck here.
We have exactly *one* spare SGI with GICv3, as we lose 8 of them
to the secure side. One possibility would be to mux some of the
lesser used IPIs onto two SGIs (one with standard priority, and
one with NMI priority).
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-07 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-01 21:31 [PATCH v9 0/7] arm64: Add debug IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for it Douglas Anderson
2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable support for SGIs to act as NMIs Douglas Anderson
2023-08-07 9:50 ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-07 11:22 ` Sumit Garg
2023-08-07 13:25 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] arm64: idle: Tag the arm64 idle functions as __cpuidle Douglas Anderson
2023-08-07 9:52 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] arm64: Add framework for a debug IPI Douglas Anderson
2023-08-07 10:12 ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-21 22:16 ` Doug Anderson
2023-08-22 6:42 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] arm64: smp: Assign and setup the " Douglas Anderson
2023-08-07 10:17 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] arm64: ipi_debug: Add support for backtrace using " Douglas Anderson
2023-08-07 10:23 ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-22 0:06 ` Doug Anderson
2023-08-22 6:35 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] kgdb: Provide a stub kgdb_nmicallback() if !CONFIG_KGDB Douglas Anderson
2023-06-15 18:14 ` Doug Anderson
2023-06-26 14:30 ` Daniel Thompson
2023-08-07 10:27 ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-07 10:29 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] arm64: kgdb: Roundup cpus using the debug IPI Douglas Anderson
2023-08-07 10:28 ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-07 10:47 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2023-08-07 10:54 ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-07 11:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-08-07 11:13 ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-07 15:24 ` Daniel Thompson
2023-08-07 16:04 ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-08 11:17 ` Daniel Thompson
2023-06-02 5:19 ` [PATCH v9 0/7] arm64: Add debug IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for it Sumit Garg
2023-07-24 15:55 ` Doug Anderson
2023-08-07 10:41 ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-07 12:46 ` Sumit Garg
2023-08-07 14:43 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a030019c7c5887d54b97054ed7d9af12@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com \
--cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liwei391@huawei.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=msys.mizuma@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).