From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC976192492; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 13:15:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720617310; cv=none; b=QmxZm28HqYY4FYWvo9gtRCxeRVe6LziJLx1zMpEWDQu10ztfK8s/NW9u4+nq9UjSF+v8zcAoarbM+v3SFxXTAfT99kHK+N+/RXHvOuzGACKOPXDtugmA5sePmwMCPLSXlISVr9MmczamULpqWIYfWGxRqPaAF2+L0D6EPV5QOz4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720617310; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QqROtBlwIbTLLGVHQb9i+CqPbESJBaurcZ9oTX/Jk/g=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=SutEatKfJn/AbK9ViRbMmtwNDoBp7G51VAy9P3zy+i9I3CV0TkYI82Jme7NkhYQEM1kiuO+TES2Z/C9mlyYZGYginsDSNYYQOAztLmSsuCbz+Pm82Lo0IQMbmpbYCieF54tKvZLY1Q3RxOQtxxEmx26oWheXFpeI6Vy8KdYdN6E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=mi0MmQFE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="mi0MmQFE" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1720617309; x=1752153309; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QqROtBlwIbTLLGVHQb9i+CqPbESJBaurcZ9oTX/Jk/g=; b=mi0MmQFEhXE0BxsrYOAzEm49nF9XF94rR9mwtvJrYV3o+xkB/lp5ibUu 4QRbUd3Rb+lFpT6GgFeWeIKM59RXW9Wi7qNia+hVdJVx9UozUsuBfwCAN jP88xAVTMurCzpvZ1PAXfv+0fiGowKkiTYO2Vs/KH+bwbXM2DUBN9M61r s9Qe7s8K0Ctn2g/hdOKMAm3hmetw+ReX5UHbGAnRGXw6ErCJ7Bb5aRUsr lbZLgsUfCVD42NjXUxPugUsQIzg9+X6baZBf6Duw1lrWULrVGozs5ovS9 F6INT/F6+1UanC/CTuhCDVwnI593EcrEB06Iser0SvnZSjA8f30q3CgMo A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: TNGWco4QTxq5+ubrKs3PCQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: HvC3B+IUT7iKKcDd3Udp+A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11128"; a="20840264" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,198,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="20840264" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by fmvoesa107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Jul 2024 06:15:08 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: bCHm0/F/Q4WgbKzFPP11sg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 9lkXQ7MjRMmArgSvJof8OQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,198,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="53012361" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.54.29.200]) by orviesa003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Jul 2024 06:15:08 -0700 Received: from [10.212.47.151] (kliang2-mobl1.ccr.corp.intel.com [10.212.47.151]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B49EF20738FE; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 06:15:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:15:05 -0400 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] [perf vendor events] e2641db83f: perf-sanity-tests.perf_all_PMU_test.fail To: kernel test robot , Ian Rogers Cc: oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, Linux Memory Management List , Namhyung Kim , Weilin Wang , Caleb Biggers , Alexandre Torgue , Maxime Coquelin , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <202407101021.2c8baddb-oliver.sang@intel.com> Content-Language: en-US From: "Liang, Kan" In-Reply-To: <202407101021.2c8baddb-oliver.sang@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2024-07-10 12:59 a.m., kernel test robot wrote: > > > Hello, > > kernel test robot noticed "perf-sanity-tests.perf_all_PMU_test.fail" on: > > commit: e2641db83f18782f57a0e107c50d2d1731960fb8 ("perf vendor events: Add/update skylake events/metrics") > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master > > [test failed on linux-next/master 82d01fe6ee52086035b201cfa1410a3b04384257] > > in testcase: perf-sanity-tests > version: > with following parameters: > > perf_compiler: gcc > > > > compiler: gcc-13 > test machine: 16 threads 1 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) E-2278G CPU @ 3.40GHz (Coffee Lake) with 32G memory > > (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace) > > > we also observed two cases which also failed on parent can pass on this commit. > FYI. > > > caccae3ce7b988b6 e2641db83f18782f57a0e107c50 > ---------------- --------------------------- > fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs > | | | > :6 100% 6:6 perf-sanity-tests.perf_all_PMU_test.fail > :6 100% 6:6 perf-sanity-tests.perf_all_metricgroups_test.pass > :6 100% 6:6 perf-sanity-tests.perf_all_metrics_test.pass > > > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202407101021.2c8baddb-oliver.sang@intel.com > > > > 2024-07-09 07:09:53 sudo /usr/src/linux-perf-x86_64-rhel-8.3-bpf-e2641db83f18782f57a0e107c50d2d1731960fb8/tools/perf/perf test 105 > 105: perf all metricgroups test : Ok > 2024-07-09 07:10:11 sudo /usr/src/linux-perf-x86_64-rhel-8.3-bpf-e2641db83f18782f57a0e107c50d2d1731960fb8/tools/perf/perf test 106 > 106: perf all metrics test : Ok > 2024-07-09 07:10:23 sudo /usr/src/linux-perf-x86_64-rhel-8.3-bpf-e2641db83f18782f57a0e107c50d2d1731960fb8/tools/perf/perf test 107 > 107: perf all libpfm4 events test : Ok > 2024-07-09 07:10:47 sudo /usr/src/linux-perf-x86_64-rhel-8.3-bpf-e2641db83f18782f57a0e107c50d2d1731960fb8/tools/perf/perf test 108 > 108: perf all PMU test : FAILED! Can you please try the -vvv option, which should tell the failed event? perf test -vvv "perf all PMU test" Thanks, Kan > > > > The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at: > https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240710/202407101021.2c8baddb-oliver.sang@intel.com > > >