linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kajoljain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>,
	Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/perf/metricgroup: Fix printing event names of metric group with multiple events
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 11:24:05 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a32e131e-1ade-b770-724d-63270b0fbe7e@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191211134528.GC15181@kernel.org>


On 12/11/19 7:15 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 12:25:22PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
>>
>> On 11/20/19 2:10 PM, Kajol Jain wrote:
>>> Commit f01642e4912b ("perf metricgroup: Support multiple
>>> events for metricgroup") introduced support for multiple events
>>> in a metric group. But with the current upstream, metric events
>>> names are not printed properly
>>>
>>> In power9 platform:
>>> command:# ./perf stat --metric-only -M translation -C 0 -I 1000 sleep 2
>>>        1.000208486
>>>        2.000368863
>>>        2.001400558
>>>
>>> Similarly in skylake platform:
>>> command:./perf stat --metric-only -M Power -I 1000
>>>        1.000579994
>>>        2.002189493
>>>
>>> With current upstream version, issue is with event name comparison
>>> logic in find_evsel_group(). Current logic is to compare events
>>> belonging to a metric group to the events in perf_evlist.
>>> Since the break statement is missing in the loop used for comparison
>>> between metric group and perf_evlist events, the loop continues to
>>> execute even after getting a pattern match, and end up in discarding
>>> the matches.
>>> Incase of single metric event belongs to metric group, its working fine,
>>> because in case of single event once it compare all events it reaches to
>>> end of perf_evlist.
>>>
>>> Example for single metric event in power9 platform
>>> command:# ./perf stat --metric-only  -M branches_per_inst -I 1000 sleep 1
>>>        1.000094653                  0.2
>>>        1.001337059                  0.0
>>>
>>> Patch fixes the issue by making sure once we found all events
>>> belongs to that metric event matched in find_evsel_group(), we
>>> successfully break from that loop by adding corresponding condition.
>>>
>>> With this patch:
>>> In power9 platform:
>>>
>>> command:# ./perf stat --metric-only -M translation -C 0 -I 1000 sleep 2
>>> result:#           time derat_4k_miss_rate_percent  derat_4k_miss_ratio
>>>        derat_miss_ratio derat_64k_miss_rate_percent derat_64k_miss_ratio
>>>            dslb_miss_rate_percent islb_miss_rate_percent
>>>        1.000135672                         0.0                  0.3
>>>                     1.0                          0.0                  0.2
>>>                    0.0                     0.0
>>>        2.000380617                         0.0                  0.0
>>>                                                 0.0                  0.0
>>>                   0.0                     0.0
>>>
>>> command:# ./perf stat --metric-only -M Power -I 1000
>>>
>>> Similarly in skylake platform:
>>> result:#           time    Turbo_Utilization    C3_Core_Residency
>>>               C6_Core_Residency    C7_Core_Residency     C2_Pkg_Residency
>>>                C3_Pkg_Residency     C6_Pkg_Residency     C7_Pkg_Residency
>>>        1.000563580                  0.3                  0.0
>>>                     2.6                44.2                 21.9
>>>                     0.0                  0.0                  0.0
>>>        2.002235027                  0.4                  0.0
>>>                     2.7           43.0                 20.7
>>>                     0.0                  0.0               0.0
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
>>> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
>>> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>>> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> Cc: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
>> Fixes: f01642e4912b ("perf metricgroup: Support multiple events for metricgroup")
>> Reviewed-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested on a Skylake machine and applied.
>
>> But while looking at the patch, I found that, commit f01642e4912b
>> has (again) screwed up logic for metric with overlapping events.
> Is someone looking into this?


Hi Arnaldo,

             I am looking  into this issue and will post the fix soon.

Kajol

>   
>>    $ sudo ./perf stat -M UPI,IPC sleep 1
>>
>>     Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1':
>>
>>             948,650      uops_retired.retire_slots
>>             866,182      inst_retired.any          #      0.7 IPC
>>             866,182      inst_retired.any
>>           1,175,671      cpu_clk_unhalted.thread
>>
>> This also needs to be fixed.
>>
>> Ravi

      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-12-12  5:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-20  8:40 [PATCH] tools/perf/metricgroup: Fix printing event names of metric group with multiple events Kajol Jain
2019-12-04  6:55 ` Ravi Bangoria
2019-12-11 13:45   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-12-11 20:38     ` Andi Kleen
2019-12-12  5:54     ` kajoljain [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a32e131e-1ade-b770-724d-63270b0fbe7e@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).