From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is it possible to trace events and its call stack?
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:48:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a503b385-2ee0-a18b-c79a-a5eb1aedd5cf@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170116115525.21e12d967e0acf8159c29165@kernel.org>
At 01/16/2017 10:55 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:49:08 +0800
> Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is it possible to use perf/ftrace to trace events and its call stack?
>>
>> [Background]
>> It's one structure in btrfs, btrfs_bio, I'm tracing for.
>> That structure is allocated and free somewhat frequently, and its size
>> is not fixed, so no SLAB/SLUB cache is used.
>>
>> I added trace events(or trace points, anyway, just in
>> include/trace/events/btrfs.h) to trace the allocation and freeing.
>> Which will output the pointer address of that structure, so I can pair
>> them, alone with other info.
>>
>> Things went well until, I found some structures are allocated but not
>> freed. (no corresponding trace point is triggered for given address).
>>
>> It's possible that btrfs just forget to free it, or btrfs is just
>> holding it for some purpose.
>> So kernel memleak detector won't catch the later one.
>>
>> That's to say along with the tracepoint data, I still need the call
>> stack of each calling, to determine the code who leak or hold the pointer.
>>
>> Is it possible to do it using perf or ftrace?
>
> If you are using ftrace, yes, you can enable stacktrace for each
> events by setting stacktrace event trigger as below;
>
> echo stacktrace > events/btrfs/<your event>/trigger
>
> Then ftrace will show the stacktrace data.
> See /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/README for more details. :)
That's great!
The most pure ftrace method!
I also found perf makes life easier compared to pure ftrace one :)
Although after some search, I didn't find any equivalent of
"function_graph" tracer, which is quite handy to handle small amount of
calling time data.
Does it mean perf tool just doesn't support?
Thanks,
Qu
Thanks,
Qu
>
> Thank you,
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Qu
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-16 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-12 7:49 Is it possible to trace events and its call stack? Qu Wenruo
2017-01-12 10:16 ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-01-12 20:41 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-01-16 8:54 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-01-16 2:55 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-01-16 8:48 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2017-01-16 12:26 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-01-16 19:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a503b385-2ee0-a18b-c79a-a5eb1aedd5cf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).