linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/ptrace: Make user_hwdebug_state.dbg_regs[] array size as ARM_MAX_BRP
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 14:02:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a76b6bb7-f6ac-4e0c-abd0-b2af9fde8691@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250421055212.123774-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>



On 4/21/25 11:22, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Array elements inside 'struct user_hwdebug_state.dbg_regs[]' are inherently
> coupled with maximum breakpoints or watchpoints which could be present on a
> platform and which are defined with macros ARM_MAX_[BRP|WRP].
> 
> Rather than explicitly trying to keep the array elements in sync with these
> macros and then adding a BUILD_BUG_ON() just to ensure continued compliance
> , move these two macros into the uapi ptrace header itself thus making them
> available both for user space and kernel.
> 
> While here also ensure that ARM_MAX_BRP and ARM_MAX_WRP are always the same
> via a new BUILD_BUG_ON(). This helps in making sure that user_hwdebug_state
> structure remains usable both for breakpoint and watchpoint registers set
> via ptrace() system call interface.
> 
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---
> This patch applies on v6.15-rc3

Gentle ping, any updates on this.

> 
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h |  7 -------
>  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h   | 10 +++++++++-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c      |  9 +++++++++
>  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
> index bd81cf17744a..63c21b515647 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
> @@ -75,13 +75,6 @@ static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
>  #define ARM_KERNEL_STEP_ACTIVE	1
>  #define ARM_KERNEL_STEP_SUSPEND	2
>  
> -/*
> - * Limits.
> - * Changing these will require modifications to the register accessors.
> - */
> -#define ARM_MAX_BRP		16
> -#define ARM_MAX_WRP		16
> -
>  /* Virtual debug register bases. */
>  #define AARCH64_DBG_REG_BVR	0
>  #define AARCH64_DBG_REG_BCR	(AARCH64_DBG_REG_BVR + ARM_MAX_BRP)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
> index 0f39ba4f3efd..8683f541a467 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
> @@ -99,6 +99,14 @@ struct user_fpsimd_state {
>  	__u32		__reserved[2];
>  };
>  
> +/*
> + * Maximum number of breakpoint and watchpoint registers
> + * on the platform. These macros get used both in kernel
> + * and user space as well.
> + */
> +#define ARM_MAX_BRP		16
> +#define ARM_MAX_WRP		16
> +
>  struct user_hwdebug_state {
>  	__u32		dbg_info;
>  	__u32		pad;
> @@ -106,7 +114,7 @@ struct user_hwdebug_state {
>  		__u64	addr;
>  		__u32	ctrl;
>  		__u32	pad;
> -	}		dbg_regs[16];
> +	}		dbg_regs[ARM_MAX_BRP];	/* Or ARM_MAX_WRP */
>  };
>  
>  /* SVE/FP/SIMD state (NT_ARM_SVE & NT_ARM_SSVE) */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> index 722ac45f9f7b..9bc51682713d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> @@ -981,6 +981,15 @@ static int __init arch_hw_breakpoint_init(void)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Maximum supported breakpoint and watchpoint registers must
> +	 * always be the same - regardless of actual register numbers
> +	 * found on a given platform. This is because the user facing
> +	 * ptrace structure 'user_hwdebug_state' actually depends on
> +	 * these macros to be the same.
> +	 */
> +	BUILD_BUG_ON(ARM_MAX_BRP != ARM_MAX_WRP);
> +
>  	core_num_brps = get_num_brps();
>  	core_num_wrps = get_num_wrps();
>  

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-05  8:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-21  5:52 [PATCH] arm64/ptrace: Make user_hwdebug_state.dbg_regs[] array size as ARM_MAX_BRP Anshuman Khandual
2025-05-05  8:32 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2025-05-16 13:59 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-30  3:49   ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-05-30 12:46     ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a76b6bb7-f6ac-4e0c-abd0-b2af9fde8691@arm.com \
    --to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).