From: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: vmolnaro@redhat.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
mpetlan@redhat.com, kan.liang@linux.intel.com,
irogers@google.com, acme@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: perf sched timehist --state vs perf script
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 12:32:31 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a8297e65-97fc-507c-1b73-7547374688c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZyF_JDYF4wgEmbrW@google.com>
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 06:36:30PM +0200, vmolnaro@redhat.com wrote:
> > From: Veronika Molnarova <vmolnaro@redhat.com>
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > We encountered an issue with 'perf sched timehist --state' when
> > we expected for a test case that the process of a workload would
> > eventually end in the dead state(marked by 'X') and be switched
> > out. This can be seen also by using 'perf script':
> >
> > # perf sched record -a sleep 1
> > [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.167 MB perf.data (166 samples) ]
> > # perf script | grep sleep
> > sleep 151541 [000] 193461.410617: sched:sched_stat_runtime: comm=sleep pid=151541 runtime=3132275 [ns]
> > sleep 151541 [000] 193461.410624: sched:sched_switch: sleep:151541 [120] S ==> swapper/0:0 [120]
> > swapper 0 [000] 193462.410688: sched:sched_waking: comm=sleep pid=151541 prio=120 target_cpu=000
> > swapper 0 [000] 193462.410698: sched:sched_switch: swapper/0:0 [120] R ==> sleep:151541 [120]
> > :151541 151541 [000] 193462.411100: sched:sched_stat_runtime: comm=sleep pid=151541 runtime=407210 [ns]
> > :151541 151541 [000] 193462.411107: sched:sched_switch: sleep:151541 [120] X ==> swapper/0:0 [120]
> >
> > But for the 'perf sched timehist --state' the process is shown
> > in the zombie state when it is being switched out:
> >
> > # perf sched timehist --state | grep 151541
> > Samples do not have callchains.
> > 193461.410624 [0000] sleep[151541] 0.000 0.054 3.129 S
> > 193462.411107 [0000] :151541[151541] 0.000 0.000 0.408 Z
> >
> > Shouldn't both commands report the same result, or is there a reason
> > why 'perf script' uses the dead state while 'perf sched' uses dead?
Hello! Thanks for reacting!
>
> I remember there was a discussion related to this.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240122070859.1394479-2-zegao@tencent.com/
>
> And it seems it's fixed both in perf and libtraceevent. Maybe your
> libtraceevent is somewhat outdated and doesn't have the update.
>
Yes! When we've updated libtraceevent to 1.8.3, both show Z now, which is
probably correct.
Then it comes into my mind whether shouldn't perf-sched and perf-script
both take it from libtraceevent to unify the approaches, rather than
perf-sched using its own implementation and perf-script taking it from
libtraceevent... ?
> > It also seems that the 'perf sched' cannot read the name of the zombie
> > process, but that can be a different issue.
>
> Hmm.. right. It should update thread->comm using the sched_switch event.
According to the tests, the name seems that it used to be translated correctly
in past, so it'd be nice if it worked again, althoug it is pretty clear which
process it was, according to the PID. Thus, the test can be adjusted to search
for the combination "PID, status Z", instead of "command, status Z"... I.e. to
accept the current situation...
Thanks,
Michael
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-31 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-24 16:36 perf sched timehist --state vs perf script vmolnaro
2024-10-30 0:34 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-10-31 11:32 ` Michael Petlan [this message]
2024-11-02 6:20 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a8297e65-97fc-507c-1b73-7547374688c@redhat.com \
--to=mpetlan@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=vmolnaro@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).