From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 09/11] arm64: Handle BRBE booting requirements
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 14:17:18 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a8b8733e-2a6a-4a79-a30c-5b2c5af73ea7@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250202-arm-brbe-v19-v19-9-1c1300802385@kernel.org>
On 2/3/25 06:13, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>
> To use the Branch Record Buffer Extension (BRBE), some configuration is
> necessary at EL3 and EL2. This patch documents the requirements and adds
> the initial EL2 setup code, which largely consists of configuring the
> fine-grained traps and initializing a couple of BRBE control registers.
>
> Before this patch, __init_el2_fgt() would initialize HDFGRTR_EL2 and
> HDFGWTR_EL2 with the same value, relying on the read/write trap controls
> for a register occupying the same bit position in either register. The
> 'nBRBIDR' trap control only exists in bit 59 of HDFGRTR_EL2, while bit
> 59 of HDFGRTR_EL2 is RES0, and so this assumption no longer holds.
>
> To handle HDFGRTR_EL2 and HDFGWTR_EL2 having (slightly) different bit
> layouts, __init_el2_fgt() is changed to accumulate the HDFGRTR_EL2 and
> HDFGWTR_EL2 control bits separately. While making this change the
> open-coded value (1 << 62) is replaced with
> HDFG{R,W}TR_EL2_nPMSNEVFR_EL1_MASK.
>
> The BRBCR_EL1 and BRBCR_EL2 registers are unusual and require special
> initialisation: even though they are subject to E2H renaming, both have
> an effect regardless of HCR_EL2.TGE, even when running at EL2, and
> consequently both need to be initialised. This is handled in
> __init_el2_brbe() with a comment to explain the situation.
>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> [Mark: rewrite commit message, fix typo in comment]
This commit message after rewrite is better, thanks !
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
> Documentation/arch/arm64/booting.rst | 21 +++++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm64/booting.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm64/booting.rst
> index cad6fdc96b98..0a421757cacf 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arch/arm64/booting.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/arch/arm64/booting.rst
> @@ -352,6 +352,27 @@ Before jumping into the kernel, the following conditions must be met:
>
> - HWFGWTR_EL2.nSMPRI_EL1 (bit 54) must be initialised to 0b01.
>
> + For CPUs with feature Branch Record Buffer Extension (FEAT_BRBE):
> +
> + - If EL3 is present:
> +
> + - MDCR_EL3.SBRBE (bits 33:32) must be initialised to 0b11.
> +
> + - If the kernel is entered at EL1 and EL2 is present:
> +
> + - BRBCR_EL2.CC (bit 3) must be initialised to 0b1.
> + - BRBCR_EL2.MPRED (bit 4) must be initialised to 0b1.
> +
> + - HDFGRTR_EL2.nBRBDATA (bit 61) must be initialised to 0b1.
> + - HDFGRTR_EL2.nBRBCTL (bit 60) must be initialised to 0b1.
> + - HDFGRTR_EL2.nBRBIDR (bit 59) must be initialised to 0b1.
> +
> + - HDFGWTR_EL2.nBRBDATA (bit 61) must be initialised to 0b1.
> + - HDFGWTR_EL2.nBRBCTL (bit 60) must be initialised to 0b1.
> +
> + - HFGITR_EL2.nBRBIALL (bit 56) must be initialised to 0b1.
> + - HFGITR_EL2.nBRBINJ (bit 55) must be initialised to 0b1.
> +
> For CPUs with the Scalable Matrix Extension FA64 feature (FEAT_SME_FA64):
>
> - If EL3 is present:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
> index 25e162651750..bf21ce513aff 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
> @@ -163,6 +163,39 @@
> .Lskip_set_cptr_\@:
> .endm
>
> +/*
> + * Configure BRBE to permit recording cycle counts and branch mispredicts.
> + *
> + * At any EL, to record cycle counts BRBE requires that both BRBCR_EL2.CC=1 and
> + * BRBCR_EL1.CC=1.
> + *
> + * At any EL, to record branch mispredicts BRBE requires that both
> + * BRBCR_EL2.MPRED=1 and BRBCR_EL1.MPRED=1.
> + *
> + * When HCR_EL2.E2H=1, the BRBCR_EL1 encoding is redirected to BRBCR_EL2, but
> + * the {CC,MPRED} bits in the real BRBCR_EL1 register still apply.
> + *
> + * Set {CC,MPRED} in both BRBCR_EL2 and BRBCR_EL1 so that at runtime we only
> + * need to enable/disable these in BRBCR_EL1 regardless of whether the kernel
> + * ends up executing in EL1 or EL2.
> + */
> +.macro __init_el2_brbe
> + mrs x1, id_aa64dfr0_el1
> + ubfx x1, x1, #ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_BRBE_SHIFT, #4
> + cbz x1, .Lskip_brbe_\@
> +
> + mov_q x0, BRBCR_ELx_CC | BRBCR_ELx_MPRED
> + msr_s SYS_BRBCR_EL2, x0
> +
> + __check_hvhe .Lset_brbe_nvhe_\@, x1
> + msr_s SYS_BRBCR_EL12, x0 // VHE
> + b .Lskip_brbe_\@
> +
> +.Lset_brbe_nvhe_\@:
> + msr_s SYS_BRBCR_EL1, x0 // NVHE
> +.Lskip_brbe_\@:
> +.endm
> +
> /* Disable any fine grained traps */
> .macro __init_el2_fgt
> mrs x1, id_aa64mmfr0_el1
> @@ -170,16 +203,48 @@
> cbz x1, .Lskip_fgt_\@
>
> mov x0, xzr
> + mov x2, xzr
> mrs x1, id_aa64dfr0_el1
> ubfx x1, x1, #ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_SHIFT, #4
> cmp x1, #3
> b.lt .Lskip_spe_fgt_\@
> +
> /* Disable PMSNEVFR_EL1 read and write traps */
> - orr x0, x0, #(1 << 62)
> + orr x0, x0, #HDFGRTR_EL2_nPMSNEVFR_EL1_MASK
> + orr x2, x2, #HDFGWTR_EL2_nPMSNEVFR_EL1_MASK
>
> .Lskip_spe_fgt_\@:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_BRBE
> + mrs x1, id_aa64dfr0_el1
> + ubfx x1, x1, #ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_BRBE_SHIFT, #4
> + cbz x1, .Lskip_brbe_reg_fgt_\@
> +
> + /*
> + * Disable read traps for the following registers
> + *
> + * [BRBSRC|BRBTGT|RBINF]_EL1
> + * [BRBSRCINJ|BRBTGTINJ|BRBINFINJ|BRBTS]_EL1
> + */
> + orr x0, x0, #HDFGRTR_EL2_nBRBDATA_MASK
> +
> + /*
> + * Disable write traps for the following registers
> + *
> + * [BRBSRCINJ|BRBTGTINJ|BRBINFINJ|BRBTS]_EL1
> + */
> + orr x2, x2, #HDFGWTR_EL2_nBRBDATA_MASK
> +
> + /* Disable read and write traps for [BRBCR|BRBFCR]_EL1 */
> + orr x0, x0, #HDFGRTR_EL2_nBRBCTL_MASK
> + orr x2, x2, #HDFGWTR_EL2_nBRBCTL_MASK
> +
> + /* Disable read traps for BRBIDR_EL1 */
> + orr x0, x0, #HDFGRTR_EL2_nBRBIDR_MASK
> +
> +.Lskip_brbe_reg_fgt_\@:
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_BRBE */
> msr_s SYS_HDFGRTR_EL2, x0
> - msr_s SYS_HDFGWTR_EL2, x0
> + msr_s SYS_HDFGWTR_EL2, x2
>
> mov x0, xzr
> mrs x1, id_aa64pfr1_el1
> @@ -220,7 +285,21 @@
> .Lset_fgt_\@:
> msr_s SYS_HFGRTR_EL2, x0
> msr_s SYS_HFGWTR_EL2, x0
> - msr_s SYS_HFGITR_EL2, xzr
> + mov x0, xzr
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_BRBE
> + mrs x1, id_aa64dfr0_el1
> + ubfx x1, x1, #ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_BRBE_SHIFT, #4
> + cbz x1, .Lskip_brbe_insn_fgt_\@
> +
> + /* Disable traps for BRBIALL instruction */
> + orr x0, x0, #HFGITR_EL2_nBRBIALL_MASK
> +
> + /* Disable traps for BRBINJ instruction */
> + orr x0, x0, #HFGITR_EL2_nBRBINJ_MASK
> +
> +.Lskip_brbe_insn_fgt_\@:
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_BRBE */
> + msr_s SYS_HFGITR_EL2, x0
>
> mrs x1, id_aa64pfr0_el1 // AMU traps UNDEF without AMU
> ubfx x1, x1, #ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_AMU_SHIFT, #4
> @@ -275,6 +354,7 @@
> __init_el2_hcrx
> __init_el2_timers
> __init_el2_debug
> + __init_el2_brbe
> __init_el2_lor
> __init_el2_stage2
> __init_el2_gicv3
>
LGTM.
Both commit message and in code comments formatting have been changed from V18.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-03 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-03 0:42 [PATCH v19 00/11] arm64/perf: Enable branch stack sampling Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-03 0:42 ` [PATCH v19 01/11] perf: arm_pmuv3: Call kvm_vcpu_pmu_resync_el0() before enabling counters Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-03 4:07 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-03 0:42 ` [PATCH v19 02/11] perf: arm_pmu: Don't disable counter in armpmu_add() Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-03 6:04 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-03 0:42 ` [PATCH v19 03/11] perf: arm_pmuv3: Don't disable counter in armv8pmu_enable_event() Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-03 6:38 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-03 0:42 ` [PATCH v19 04/11] perf: arm_v7_pmu: Drop obvious comments for enabling/disabling counters and interrupts Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-03 4:09 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-03 0:42 ` [PATCH v19 05/11] perf: arm_v7_pmu: Don't disable counter in (armv7|krait_|scorpion_)pmu_enable_event() Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-03 6:54 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-03 0:43 ` [PATCH v19 06/11] perf: apple_m1: Don't disable counter in m1_pmu_enable_event() Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-03 8:10 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-03 0:43 ` [PATCH v19 07/11] perf: arm_pmu: Move PMUv3-specific data Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-03 8:16 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-03 0:43 ` [PATCH v19 08/11] arm64/sysreg: Add BRBE registers and fields Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-03 8:32 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-03 0:43 ` [PATCH v19 09/11] arm64: Handle BRBE booting requirements Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-03 8:47 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2025-02-12 12:10 ` Leo Yan
2025-02-12 21:21 ` Rob Herring
2025-02-13 12:27 ` Leo Yan
2025-02-03 0:43 ` [PATCH v19 10/11] KVM: arm64: nvhe: Disable branch generation in nVHE guests Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-03 9:16 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-03 11:28 ` James Clark
2025-02-13 17:03 ` Leo Yan
2025-02-13 23:16 ` Rob Herring
2025-02-14 9:55 ` Leo Yan
2025-02-18 14:17 ` Rob Herring
2025-02-03 0:43 ` [PATCH v19 11/11] perf: arm_pmuv3: Add support for the Branch Record Buffer Extension (BRBE) Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-03 16:53 ` James Clark
2025-02-03 17:58 ` Rob Herring
2025-02-04 12:02 ` James Clark
2025-02-04 15:03 ` Rob Herring
2025-02-05 14:38 ` James Clark
2025-02-05 14:51 ` James Clark
2025-02-05 16:15 ` Rob Herring
2025-02-06 12:58 ` James Clark
2025-02-12 18:52 ` Leo Yan
2025-02-12 19:00 ` Leo Yan
2025-02-13 16:16 ` Leo Yan
2025-02-13 17:13 ` Rob Herring
2025-02-13 17:45 ` Leo Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a8b8733e-2a6a-4a79-a30c-5b2c5af73ea7@arm.com \
--to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).