From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas-Mich Richter Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf test: Adapt test case record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh for s390 Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 09:55:33 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20180412081959.85193-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com> <20180412131012.GC9818@kernel.org> <25418aa4-60bb-9f16-c880-8caaf8a20931@aim.com> <151b93fd-8e12-4abf-1e69-329de6eab777@linux.ibm.com> <57ea75b8-cebd-0ca2-0e4e-acf2beb6e981@aim.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <57ea75b8-cebd-0ca2-0e4e-acf2beb6e981@aim.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Martin Vuille , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com List-Id: linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org On 04/26/2018 05:26 PM, Martin Vuille wrote: > > > On 04/26/18 04:09, Thomas-Mich Richter wrote: >> was different. With you patch it changed from /usr/lib64/libc.so (old) to >> /usr/lib/debug/lib64/libc-2.26.so.debug (new) >> > Thomas, > > Can you tell me what 'file' reports for the old and new files? > > Regards, > MV > Martin, not sure I understand your question: Before your patch the file which was picked by dwarf was /usr/lib64/libc.so With your patch file which was picked by dwarf was /usr/lib/debug/lib64/libc-2.26.so.debug Was this your question? -- Thomas Richter, Dept 3303, IBM s390 Linux Development, Boeblingen, Germany -- Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294