From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Joe Mario <jmario@redhat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Santosh Shukla <santosh.shukla@amd.com>,
Ananth Narayan <ananth.narayan@amd.com>,
Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] perf test amd ibs: Add sample period unit test
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 22:13:53 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBF5UWrxvYgbnxde@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aBE8raTOCVZLfw7J@x1>
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 05:55:13PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 03:59:38AM +0000, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> > IBS Fetch and IBS Op PMUs has various constraints on supported sample
> > periods. Add perf unit tests to test those.
> >
> > Running it in parallel with other tests causes intermittent failures.
> > Mark it exclusive to force it to run sequentially. Sample output on a
> > Zen5 machine:
>
> I've applied the series and will test it now, but found some problems
> when building in some non-glibc systems, namely the use of PAGE_SIZE,
> that is used in libc headers, even in glibc, its just that in glibc we
> happen not to include that header where PAGE_SIZE gets redefined:
>
> ⬢ [acme@toolbx perf-tools-next]$ grep PAGE_SIZE /usr/include/sys/*.h
> /usr/include/sys/user.h:#define PAGE_SIZE (1UL << PAGE_SHIFT)
> /usr/include/sys/user.h:#define PAGE_MASK (~(PAGE_SIZE-1))
> /usr/include/sys/user.h:#define NBPG PAGE_SIZE
> ⬢ [acme@toolbx perf-tools-next]$
>
> So I folded the following patch, see if it is acceptable and please ack.
>
> Thanks for respining it!
Another issue when building with clang on musl:
arch/x86/tests/amd-ibs-period.c:81:3: error: no matching function for call to 'memcpy'
memcpy(func, insn1, sizeof(insn1));
^~~~~~
/usr/include/string.h:27:7: note: candidate function not viable: no known conversion from 'int (*)(void)' to 'void *' for 1st argument
void *memcpy (void *__restrict, const void *__restrict, size_t);
^
/usr/include/fortify/string.h:40:27: note: candidate function not viable: no known conversion from 'int (*)(void)' to 'void *const' for 1st argument
_FORTIFY_FN(memcpy) void *memcpy(void * _FORTIFY_POS0 __od,
^
arch/x86/tests/amd-ibs-period.c:87:3: error: no matching function for call to 'memcpy'
memcpy(func, insn2, sizeof(insn2));
^~~~~~
/usr/include/string.h:27:7: note: candidate function not viable: no known conversion from 'int (*)(void)' to 'void *' for 1st argument
void *memcpy (void *__restrict, const void *__restrict, size_t);
^
/usr/include/fortify/string.h:40:27: note: candidate function not viable: no known conversion from 'int (*)(void)' to 'void *const' for 1st argument
_FORTIFY_FN(memcpy) void *memcpy(void * _FORTIFY_POS0 __od,
^
2 errors generated.
CC /tmp/build/perf/ui/browsers/header.o
CC /tmp/build/perf/arch/x86/util/mem-events.o
Adding the patch below cures it, still need to test on a Zen 5 system.
These issues were just in the regression test.
- Arnaldo
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/amd-ibs-period.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/amd-ibs-period.c
index 946b0a377554fb81..a198434da9b5c4a1 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/amd-ibs-period.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/amd-ibs-period.c
@@ -78,13 +78,13 @@ static int dummy_workload_1(unsigned long count)
else if (count > 10000000)
count = 10000000;
while (count--) {
- memcpy(func, insn1, sizeof(insn1));
+ memcpy((void *)func, insn1, sizeof(insn1));
if (func() != 1) {
pr_debug("ERROR insn1\n");
ret = -1;
goto out;
}
- memcpy(func, insn2, sizeof(insn2));
+ memcpy((void *)func, insn2, sizeof(insn2));
if (func() != 2) {
pr_debug("ERROR insn2\n");
ret = -1;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-30 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-29 3:59 [PATCH v4 0/4] perf/amd/ibs: Add Zen5 support (tools changes) Ravi Bangoria
2025-04-29 3:59 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] perf amd ibs: Add Load Latency bits in raw dump Ravi Bangoria
2025-04-30 16:58 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-04-30 17:45 ` Ravi Bangoria
2025-04-29 3:59 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] perf amd ibs: Incorporate Zen5 DTLB and PageSize information Ravi Bangoria
2025-04-29 3:59 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] perf mem/c2c amd: Add ldlat support Ravi Bangoria
2025-04-29 3:59 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] perf test amd ibs: Add sample period unit test Ravi Bangoria
2025-04-29 20:55 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-04-30 1:13 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2025-04-30 1:22 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-04-30 9:02 ` Ravi Bangoria
2025-04-30 13:06 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-04-30 13:31 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-04-30 16:07 ` Ravi Bangoria
2025-04-30 23:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-04-30 6:36 ` Ravi Bangoria
2025-04-30 6:33 ` Ravi Bangoria
2025-04-30 2:00 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] perf/amd/ibs: Add Zen5 support (tools changes) Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-05-13 8:32 ` Ravi Bangoria
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aBF5UWrxvYgbnxde@x1 \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ananth.narayan@amd.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jmario@redhat.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).