From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ed1-f44.google.com (mail-ed1-f44.google.com [209.85.208.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A397425D20E for ; Wed, 7 May 2025 12:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.208.44 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746620992; cv=none; b=r64grR1k8h1BfCJOV4zFv1VIpCZUsXa/NDMeAVaTNk9PLwrqZ5bkI7ZFs/nMV7jSk+cCSvODDD2cs2U1A9K6bO5UyMD7L9MRDOxpDYrQ6ZVz65K/iEq/UajtuTSkP4ao1Zc2iacSA/DrjsX8RHNuROceWZWSOuorQ1+aeya8bkY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746620992; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Mqaui1F9/bOT/JMKClMuGVkx2vOY4zGOZ5ph/2yYf6I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gHoeTPiHC01phrCJ1rRgSnF8pakaE+vqotTMnnlPYC1X0rHXCCLbYACQoHHbEdMcil9mGhd+hso5TPC0evs3yz+mXVjfQ9Z1Qm//0L74RUZCG2PvZlRMfoCKvy5XB98tPa0d5/GoiscmoChM7xwnVuZOtgAf2FSNScWxPNpkoYc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b=PEwP1aAD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.208.44 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="PEwP1aAD" Received: by mail-ed1-f44.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5fbfdf7d353so227572a12.0 for ; Wed, 07 May 2025 05:29:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=google; t=1746620989; x=1747225789; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZW0x6+aPcBTGf4RTVQ8qhVtJhNXiKy2eXwn1Y4GghS4=; b=PEwP1aADFuIaRTSntQhykyjqBYcV858AXTJdBoF0vhOJ2NnxgFwT9S8QzO6/8u3TOX YXD4/bPwrqnTmZFsKlA4nGKofy/QJj+cfTLQw1hh07Z5sRfHM9GQJ8dB2iQWcv6i2sBT W8oHd1QIsuQLaDNOIwpDO23SjAVdeUkshwbyrFQQtSpmpwKyP9yW87HHOgfyxnPDRyYq j/nMHNJEUi2sVU/dP35gqIDKdsfWlFqWzCL/z9PLr8f1IcYkwoZTfJ2zatcIA3DU9S93 ySS9oacZGkqQ8a3yXGmVdRyv9rOHoZLziVQEbEVr8eeeM7XdJ+iv3Uy3OFJSXJ8ZpqGO yqBg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1746620989; x=1747225789; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ZW0x6+aPcBTGf4RTVQ8qhVtJhNXiKy2eXwn1Y4GghS4=; b=vFza/fGc4/qVbOqaheQP+naXFW0gRjuh6kn204xmzSnAW+sOc/3PQkq296Tli/H05O 8qyZFwCPeQW+d/TaZcWTKJbxDXjZtAqWS/3ryhgompXo65stZJO7zbl3kyl9hvCCuqPC hQjTGc/4nB3p8XKXh8ffUGo/syD1HJ7SZjTPLp7SLYiGk3EVYoJKwOl3dg8MsEUg2nrQ GzfBNgmT1L24zbnbCUda1aT7wsCl8I4L9CU61s3aUjM+EDLMkZRmnDCZhL/esF8TKz2q 8KkeMIwfUICo8kJPQ1Nh/twg5J1l4JXmm9SUoeE49RoMvF89icjUmyu4bEczQex2J5CS Ecjw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV7S12gJPdWXRWTLJLEpSNjnW9gvgRjBTS/dJoy8kGSgayq2mNzIaT13/qtazc1aMB9SFit3XATSgXwnQe1NqJr@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxaxR1xB9syi/xCs2GbnuoGQtyHE8kJ9Z9eawsDiLP77JAyIj1U JXc0Z37mgJpnB4g8xfADxB5cwsdbgxk+DDqmFcEBlqR/U2w3X1HcKhbZggV5usc= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncte7WfcI4Y0xUOKrHLftPcoBEWA0CctUT88OzL4hXsTK7XksguwcZjW16Lr3DP 35N/9vWkaFEYwaMSw5vyVGN+bRYxgcu+nXuRG0uLSf9tSHuJBM8BjQ+Mev8pN0MXolcaiOJc65R XY4SLcegzMhBKFuYyZhtVp33QNByZPDbq/tDXxfUEwnRfu7dsXUmuuN+OjWOLVFY8oihzHvtJu2 EMJ9Tzn3Ci2QZka8XiIgayFbseT6xCcR5soTmkReR0pEwPW0faRpLQPZf7897d7Hg9xIfZKEgDM THIxJSMFS++s1xlI3KxXH2p60hjR5h3sPg2Um0cx X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFcaF2HbosKXMSG7ssx4/Idj9ECcUf+SjKCY6flcCBO1BJAIS54Xv8b1MSnCIFm4q1ZvQeSUQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2804:b0:5fa:aa28:b10 with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5fbe9dcd645mr2810548a12.13.1746620988876; Wed, 07 May 2025 05:29:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pathway.suse.cz ([193.86.92.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5fa777c5c3asm9429175a12.21.2025.05.07.05.29.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 07 May 2025 05:29:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 14:29:46 +0200 From: Petr Mladek To: Bhupesh Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, kernel-dev@igalia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, oliver.sang@intel.com, lkp@intel.com, laoar.shao@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, arnaldo.melo@gmail.com, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com, mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl, peterz@infradead.org, willy@infradead.org, david@redhat.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, keescook@chromium.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] treewide: Switch memcpy() users of 'task->comm' to a more safer implementation Message-ID: References: <20250507110444.963779-1-bhupesh@igalia.com> <20250507110444.963779-3-bhupesh@igalia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250507110444.963779-3-bhupesh@igalia.com> On Wed 2025-05-07 16:34:43, Bhupesh wrote: > As Linus mentioned in [1], currently we have several memcpy() use-cases > which use 'current->comm' to copy the task name over to local copies. > For an example: > > ... > char comm[TASK_COMM_LEN]; > memcpy(comm, current->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN); > ... > > These should be modified so that we can later implement approaches > to handle the task->comm's 16-byte length limitation (TASK_COMM_LEN) > is a more modular way (follow-up patches do the same): > > ... > char comm[TASK_COMM_LEN]; > memcpy(comm, current->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN); > comm[TASK_COMM_LEN - 1] = 0; > ... > > The relevant 'memcpy()' users were identified using the following search > pattern: > $ git grep 'memcpy.*->comm\>' > > [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wjAmmHUg6vho1KjzQi2=psR30+CogFd4aXrThr2gsiS4g@mail.gmail.com/ > > --- a/include/linux/coredump.h > +++ b/include/linux/coredump.h > @@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ extern void do_coredump(const kernel_siginfo_t *siginfo); > do { \ > char comm[TASK_COMM_LEN]; \ > /* This will always be NUL terminated. */ \ > - memcpy(comm, current->comm, sizeof(comm)); \ > + memcpy(comm, current->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN); \ > + comm[TASK_COMM_LEN] = '\0'; \ I would expect that we replace this with a helper function/macro which would do the right thing. Why is get_task_comm() not used here, please? > printk_ratelimited(Level "coredump: %d(%*pE): " Format "\n", \ Also the name seems to be used for printing a debug information. I would expect that we could use the bigger buffer here and print the "full" name. Is this planed, please? > task_tgid_vnr(current), (int)strlen(comm), comm, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ > } while (0) \ > diff --git a/include/trace/events/block.h b/include/trace/events/block.h > index bd0ea07338eb..94a941ac2034 100644 > --- a/include/trace/events/block.h > +++ b/include/trace/events/block.h > @@ -214,6 +214,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(block_rq, > blk_fill_rwbs(__entry->rwbs, rq->cmd_flags); > __get_str(cmd)[0] = '\0'; > memcpy(__entry->comm, current->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN); > + __entry->comm[TASK_COMM_LEN - 1] = '\0'; Same for all other callers. That said, I am not sure if the larger buffer is save in all situations. > ), Best Regards, Petr