From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44C1F1C84DE; Mon, 12 May 2025 16:46:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747068395; cv=none; b=p7ovukZu0iODKmcVbFdF/6WbsK7FlscOWjZ2b4A045xU0Uznl4ejE7sDCUd4LAgB2OxLQUc4FQjJkTnsXwZQ5u84FoTPv+Jtm8s8BPbBpXDZ5I8sjHCRPzu3+r+Xh78MaUGpogotogNo7sWxPgxflyWTf9AYGwixKuhGk3/mxNI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747068395; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GwZlY2b0tKZfe41eon1DKjEtn8ZXjyuesZ7d2StAMoY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=s0PbcG33rPDaI7OSfTm+DrE6pKDSbGfOQ622c7KaOmuJJKxlLs4fZ1d9S/OAT2Vmoz25/ijafNUPinOvO16ZkZhWh0WxjcT+XwTJka9iYTg7UBdWTOjjNk7jyXC6sN4Wg+bhy8U1JavUuS9lGLlNw8vj6oEKjZD3hGJzxL9ddw8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=T21HUW4j; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="T21HUW4j" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C0327C4CEEF; Mon, 12 May 2025 16:46:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747068395; bh=GwZlY2b0tKZfe41eon1DKjEtn8ZXjyuesZ7d2StAMoY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=T21HUW4jJe8XX3W1o7BFNnWfCJ8Kt+w4YvUeqLXatxMNTY3nYkjQsbsEqzXcrJQ/a fBs8XdvNZROeE+g35jUxfTgtKehLOQ7T67ppd/9f/7bCKDnA9DCFy/b/libygdlZlL PJ63D1PlpsWvFImAvTHVoo7QcCZvtPXpmaeJjmQT03mStOKpyhOHJiPzIwE1+D6UPX aeDC1krlhtgLo9ZUDNpYfDt/dxBHFX03R8wmp7Rt3eaLxVFp/ngAEsEKCrrqUfscEe yni8MjqIq4XvcaG3ZoNYvi9NmBArkjANR3h+Yd9rWWnykQLHVF3ZHruOxYkshVkQY8 nKwZV0UNPEyAw== Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 13:46:32 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ian Rogers Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Namhyung Kim , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , Kan@google.com, Liang@google.com, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, James Clark , Weilin Wang , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] perf evsel: Add per-thread warning for EOPNOTSUPP open failues Message-ID: References: <20250412004704.2297939-1-irogers@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250412004704.2297939-1-irogers@google.com> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 05:47:03PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > The mrvl_ddr_pmu will return EOPNOTSUPP if opened in per-thread > mode. Give a warning for this similar to EINVAL. Doing this better > supports metric testing with limited permissions when the mrvl_ddr_pmu > is present, as the failure to open causes the test to skip and not > fail. Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next, - Arnaldo