From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D95012DD95; Tue, 13 May 2025 20:46:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747169194; cv=none; b=ZMN/eJddLmpuaXLjfxMs+X7H2gEm0lfcHqXMrhp6NQQN7pvxsU/jzVFUY7uCyDuyiRnpZtWY44md+1K0RNAE7btgYv0tjR0OA8K/Hx6Hbgx4ntMNQMHQjGTx8wCbWc7pOleTFTB9soaLbigELvlXhz6zONV0+6whdCHcoTjk3H4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747169194; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iNYXwGdie6s9H3tf/OQ0GlhvsYZI0vpta/O/nlr0LRA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=jxFmgbfnMjVmKdA3/oLC95AQip/vAmZZcYBYQyDOJ2p4tICnQvCev2/tSmUcEN0Cds0maV803253hYxoi91Ki0GeOFpVusqLCTQF7E8QoNBAe/E1qRPgJklkKXsV7+xp14abb8r4d2/k6ZZWKKJJRHQUy2ntd6t0oSZx7J//A64= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=bJAGs9h7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="bJAGs9h7" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A2E1DC4CEE4; Tue, 13 May 2025 20:46:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747169194; bh=iNYXwGdie6s9H3tf/OQ0GlhvsYZI0vpta/O/nlr0LRA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=bJAGs9h7G/jHx15vjirkpgmHB5q+SSHosWpyx5WbqLv1FIH8ys0wW2HyhJKHLrG1E urewg9KSpFMoxm1D8EG5zO9uqSeFrdDVSNxEwK38/rLMzvk3igF1ennA54C4LOdhIt 5K+KLCSuHgihuAu8Nq2bhulNElCVopzHkTSevSWCx83wRUtHhY34XmmWbX9xw2V+eR tDKD3qublc22x98Vgjls8vMs7bKPGXPS8x4bef0zvS9WgKuGjWsD0WuPhZKyz33r4W RO+LpB8rl2vqFENiUATf3T3H2AGVdR/1YiTiUOh4ZmQHP3Kgox+ZZrUIU6Q+VtxW7q 1EwiwwvN+BBgg== Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 17:46:31 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ian Rogers Cc: Namhyung Kim , Kan Liang , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , LKML , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf test: Fix LBR test by ignoring idle task Message-ID: References: <20250509213017.204343-1-namhyung@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 07:58:07AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 2:30 PM Namhyung Kim wrote: > > I found 'perf record LBR tests' failing due to empty branch stacks. > > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim > Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next, - Arnaldo