From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, irogers@google.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, eranian@google.com,
ctshao@google.com, tmricht@linux.ibm.com, leo.yan@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 02/16] perf: Fix the throttle logic for a group
Date: Sun, 18 May 2025 12:18:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCoynoKRbpnOZ7QE@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250516182853.2610284-3-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Hi Kan,
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 11:28:39AM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>
> The current throttle logic doesn't work well with a group, e.g., the
> following sampling-read case.
>
> $ perf record -e "{cycles,cycles}:S" ...
>
> $ perf report -D | grep THROTTLE | tail -2
> THROTTLE events: 426 ( 9.0%)
> UNTHROTTLE events: 425 ( 9.0%)
>
> $ perf report -D | grep PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE -a4 | tail -n 5
> 0 1020120874009167 0x74970 [0x68]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x1):
> ... sample_read:
> .... group nr 2
> ..... id 0000000000000327, value 000000000cbb993a, lost 0
> ..... id 0000000000000328, value 00000002211c26df, lost 0
>
> The second cycles event has a much larger value than the first cycles
> event in the same group.
>
> The current throttle logic in the generic code only logs the THROTTLE
> event. It relies on the specific driver implementation to disable
> events. For all ARCHs, the implementation is similar. Only the event is
> disabled, rather than the group.
>
> The logic to disable the group should be generic for all ARCHs. Add the
> logic in the generic code. The following patch will remove the buggy
> driver-specific implementation.
>
> The throttle only happens when an event is overflowed. Stop the entire
> group when any event in the group triggers the throttle.
> The MAX_INTERRUPTS is set to all throttle events.
>
> The unthrottled could happen in 3 places.
> - event/group sched. All events in the group are scheduled one by one.
> All of them will be unthrottled eventually. Nothing needs to be
> changed.
> - The perf_adjust_freq_unthr_events for each tick. Needs to restart the
> group altogether.
> - The __perf_event_period(). The whole group needs to be restarted
> altogether as well.
>
> With the fix,
> $ sudo perf report -D | grep PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE -a4 | tail -n 5
> 0 3573470770332 0x12f5f8 [0x70]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x2):
> ... sample_read:
> .... group nr 2
> ..... id 0000000000000a28, value 00000004fd3dfd8f, lost 0
> ..... id 0000000000000a29, value 00000004fd3dfd8f, lost 0
Thanks for working on this!
>
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> kernel/events/core.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index af78ec118e8f..52490c2ce45b 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -2739,6 +2739,39 @@ void perf_event_disable_inatomic(struct perf_event *event)
> static void perf_log_throttle(struct perf_event *event, int enable);
> static void perf_log_itrace_start(struct perf_event *event);
>
> +static void perf_event_unthrottle(struct perf_event *event, bool start)
> +{
> + event->hw.interrupts = 0;
> + if (start)
> + event->pmu->start(event, 0);
> + perf_log_throttle(event, 1);
> +}
> +
> +static void perf_event_throttle(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> + event->pmu->stop(event, 0);
> + event->hw.interrupts = MAX_INTERRUPTS;
> + perf_log_throttle(event, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void perf_event_unthrottle_group(struct perf_event *event, bool skip_start_event)
> +{
> + struct perf_event *sibling, *leader = event->group_leader;
> +
> + perf_event_unthrottle(leader, skip_start_event ? leader != event : true);
> + for_each_sibling_event(sibling, leader)
> + perf_event_unthrottle(sibling, skip_start_event ? sibling != event : true);
This will add more PERF_RECORD_THROTTLE records for sibling events.
Maybe we can generate it for the actual target event only?
Also the condition for skip_start_event is if it's a freq event.
I think we can skip pmu->start() if the sibling is also a freq event.
I remember KVM folks concern about the number of PMU accesses as it
can cause VM exits.
Thanks,
Namhyung
> +}
> +
> +static void perf_event_throttle_group(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> + struct perf_event *sibling, *leader = event->group_leader;
> +
> + perf_event_throttle(leader);
> + for_each_sibling_event(sibling, leader)
> + perf_event_throttle(sibling);
> +}
> +
> static int
> event_sched_in(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event_context *ctx)
> {
> @@ -4393,12 +4426,8 @@ static void perf_adjust_freq_unthr_events(struct list_head *event_list)
>
> hwc = &event->hw;
>
> - if (hwc->interrupts == MAX_INTERRUPTS) {
> - hwc->interrupts = 0;
> - perf_log_throttle(event, 1);
> - if (!is_event_in_freq_mode(event))
> - event->pmu->start(event, 0);
> - }
> + if (hwc->interrupts == MAX_INTERRUPTS)
> + perf_event_unthrottle_group(event, is_event_in_freq_mode(event));
>
> if (!is_event_in_freq_mode(event))
> continue;
> @@ -6426,14 +6455,6 @@ static void __perf_event_period(struct perf_event *event,
> active = (event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE);
> if (active) {
> perf_pmu_disable(event->pmu);
> - /*
> - * We could be throttled; unthrottle now to avoid the tick
> - * trying to unthrottle while we already re-started the event.
> - */
> - if (event->hw.interrupts == MAX_INTERRUPTS) {
> - event->hw.interrupts = 0;
> - perf_log_throttle(event, 1);
> - }
> event->pmu->stop(event, PERF_EF_UPDATE);
> }
>
> @@ -6441,6 +6462,14 @@ static void __perf_event_period(struct perf_event *event,
>
> if (active) {
> event->pmu->start(event, PERF_EF_RELOAD);
> + /*
> + * Once the period is force-reset, the event starts immediately.
> + * But the event/group could be throttled. Unthrottle the
> + * event/group now to avoid the next tick trying to unthrottle
> + * while we already re-started the event/group.
> + */
> + if (event->hw.interrupts == MAX_INTERRUPTS)
> + perf_event_unthrottle_group(event, true);
> perf_pmu_enable(event->pmu);
> }
> }
> @@ -10331,8 +10360,7 @@ __perf_event_account_interrupt(struct perf_event *event, int throttle)
> if (unlikely(throttle && hwc->interrupts >= max_samples_per_tick)) {
> __this_cpu_inc(perf_throttled_count);
> tick_dep_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), TICK_DEP_BIT_PERF_EVENTS);
> - hwc->interrupts = MAX_INTERRUPTS;
> - perf_log_throttle(event, 0);
> + perf_event_throttle_group(event);
> ret = 1;
> }
>
> --
> 2.38.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-18 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-16 18:28 [PATCH V3 00/16] perf: Fix the throttle logic for group kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 01/16] perf: Clean up event in freq mode check kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 02/16] perf: Fix the throttle logic for a group kan.liang
2025-05-17 8:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-20 14:16 ` Liang, Kan
2025-05-18 19:18 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2025-05-20 14:47 ` Liang, Kan
2025-05-20 20:02 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 03/16] perf/x86/intel: Remove driver-specific throttle support kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 04/16] perf/x86/amd: " kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 05/16] perf/x86/zhaoxin: " kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 06/16] powerpc/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 07/16] s390/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 08/16] perf/arm: " kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 09/16] perf/apple_m1: " kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 10/16] alpha/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 11/16] arc/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-18 21:58 ` Vineet Gupta
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 12/16] csky/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 13/16] loongarch/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 14/16] sparc/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 15/16] xtensa/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 16/16] mips/perf: " kan.liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aCoynoKRbpnOZ7QE@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=ctshao@google.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).