linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, irogers@google.com,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, eranian@google.com,
	ctshao@google.com, tmricht@linux.ibm.com, leo.yan@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 02/16] perf: Fix the throttle logic for a group
Date: Sun, 18 May 2025 12:18:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCoynoKRbpnOZ7QE@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250516182853.2610284-3-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

Hi Kan,

On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 11:28:39AM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> 
> The current throttle logic doesn't work well with a group, e.g., the
> following sampling-read case.
> 
> $ perf record -e "{cycles,cycles}:S" ...
> 
> $ perf report -D | grep THROTTLE | tail -2
>             THROTTLE events:        426  ( 9.0%)
>           UNTHROTTLE events:        425  ( 9.0%)
> 
> $ perf report -D | grep PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE -a4 | tail -n 5
> 0 1020120874009167 0x74970 [0x68]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x1):
> ... sample_read:
> .... group nr 2
> ..... id 0000000000000327, value 000000000cbb993a, lost 0
> ..... id 0000000000000328, value 00000002211c26df, lost 0
> 
> The second cycles event has a much larger value than the first cycles
> event in the same group.
> 
> The current throttle logic in the generic code only logs the THROTTLE
> event. It relies on the specific driver implementation to disable
> events. For all ARCHs, the implementation is similar. Only the event is
> disabled, rather than the group.
> 
> The logic to disable the group should be generic for all ARCHs. Add the
> logic in the generic code. The following patch will remove the buggy
> driver-specific implementation.
> 
> The throttle only happens when an event is overflowed. Stop the entire
> group when any event in the group triggers the throttle.
> The MAX_INTERRUPTS is set to all throttle events.
> 
> The unthrottled could happen in 3 places.
> - event/group sched. All events in the group are scheduled one by one.
>   All of them will be unthrottled eventually. Nothing needs to be
>   changed.
> - The perf_adjust_freq_unthr_events for each tick. Needs to restart the
>   group altogether.
> - The __perf_event_period(). The whole group needs to be restarted
>   altogether as well.
> 
> With the fix,
> $ sudo perf report -D | grep PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE -a4 | tail -n 5
> 0 3573470770332 0x12f5f8 [0x70]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x2):
> ... sample_read:
> .... group nr 2
> ..... id 0000000000000a28, value 00000004fd3dfd8f, lost 0
> ..... id 0000000000000a29, value 00000004fd3dfd8f, lost 0

Thanks for working on this!

> 
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  kernel/events/core.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index af78ec118e8f..52490c2ce45b 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -2739,6 +2739,39 @@ void perf_event_disable_inatomic(struct perf_event *event)
>  static void perf_log_throttle(struct perf_event *event, int enable);
>  static void perf_log_itrace_start(struct perf_event *event);
>  
> +static void perf_event_unthrottle(struct perf_event *event, bool start)
> +{
> +	event->hw.interrupts = 0;
> +	if (start)
> +		event->pmu->start(event, 0);
> +	perf_log_throttle(event, 1);
> +}
> +
> +static void perf_event_throttle(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> +	event->pmu->stop(event, 0);
> +	event->hw.interrupts = MAX_INTERRUPTS;
> +	perf_log_throttle(event, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void perf_event_unthrottle_group(struct perf_event *event, bool skip_start_event)
> +{
> +	struct perf_event *sibling, *leader = event->group_leader;
> +
> +	perf_event_unthrottle(leader, skip_start_event ? leader != event : true);
> +	for_each_sibling_event(sibling, leader)
> +		perf_event_unthrottle(sibling, skip_start_event ? sibling != event : true);

This will add more PERF_RECORD_THROTTLE records for sibling events.
Maybe we can generate it for the actual target event only?

Also the condition for skip_start_event is if it's a freq event.
I think we can skip pmu->start() if the sibling is also a freq event.
I remember KVM folks concern about the number of PMU accesses as it
can cause VM exits.

Thanks,
Namhyung

> +}
> +
> +static void perf_event_throttle_group(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> +	struct perf_event *sibling, *leader = event->group_leader;
> +
> +	perf_event_throttle(leader);
> +	for_each_sibling_event(sibling, leader)
> +		perf_event_throttle(sibling);
> +}
> +
>  static int
>  event_sched_in(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event_context *ctx)
>  {
> @@ -4393,12 +4426,8 @@ static void perf_adjust_freq_unthr_events(struct list_head *event_list)
>  
>  		hwc = &event->hw;
>  
> -		if (hwc->interrupts == MAX_INTERRUPTS) {
> -			hwc->interrupts = 0;
> -			perf_log_throttle(event, 1);
> -			if (!is_event_in_freq_mode(event))
> -				event->pmu->start(event, 0);
> -		}
> +		if (hwc->interrupts == MAX_INTERRUPTS)
> +			perf_event_unthrottle_group(event, is_event_in_freq_mode(event));
>  
>  		if (!is_event_in_freq_mode(event))
>  			continue;
> @@ -6426,14 +6455,6 @@ static void __perf_event_period(struct perf_event *event,
>  	active = (event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE);
>  	if (active) {
>  		perf_pmu_disable(event->pmu);
> -		/*
> -		 * We could be throttled; unthrottle now to avoid the tick
> -		 * trying to unthrottle while we already re-started the event.
> -		 */
> -		if (event->hw.interrupts == MAX_INTERRUPTS) {
> -			event->hw.interrupts = 0;
> -			perf_log_throttle(event, 1);
> -		}
>  		event->pmu->stop(event, PERF_EF_UPDATE);
>  	}
>  
> @@ -6441,6 +6462,14 @@ static void __perf_event_period(struct perf_event *event,
>  
>  	if (active) {
>  		event->pmu->start(event, PERF_EF_RELOAD);
> +		/*
> +		 * Once the period is force-reset, the event starts immediately.
> +		 * But the event/group could be throttled. Unthrottle the
> +		 * event/group now to avoid the next tick trying to unthrottle
> +		 * while we already re-started the event/group.
> +		 */
> +		if (event->hw.interrupts == MAX_INTERRUPTS)
> +			perf_event_unthrottle_group(event, true);
>  		perf_pmu_enable(event->pmu);
>  	}
>  }
> @@ -10331,8 +10360,7 @@ __perf_event_account_interrupt(struct perf_event *event, int throttle)
>  	if (unlikely(throttle && hwc->interrupts >= max_samples_per_tick)) {
>  		__this_cpu_inc(perf_throttled_count);
>  		tick_dep_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), TICK_DEP_BIT_PERF_EVENTS);
> -		hwc->interrupts = MAX_INTERRUPTS;
> -		perf_log_throttle(event, 0);
> +		perf_event_throttle_group(event);
>  		ret = 1;
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.38.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-18 19:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-16 18:28 [PATCH V3 00/16] perf: Fix the throttle logic for group kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 01/16] perf: Clean up event in freq mode check kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 02/16] perf: Fix the throttle logic for a group kan.liang
2025-05-17  8:22   ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-20 14:16     ` Liang, Kan
2025-05-18 19:18   ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2025-05-20 14:47     ` Liang, Kan
2025-05-20 20:02       ` Namhyung Kim
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 03/16] perf/x86/intel: Remove driver-specific throttle support kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 04/16] perf/x86/amd: " kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 05/16] perf/x86/zhaoxin: " kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 06/16] powerpc/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 07/16] s390/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 08/16] perf/arm: " kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 09/16] perf/apple_m1: " kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 10/16] alpha/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 11/16] arc/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-18 21:58   ` Vineet Gupta
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 12/16] csky/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 13/16] loongarch/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 14/16] sparc/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 15/16] xtensa/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-16 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 16/16] mips/perf: " kan.liang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aCoynoKRbpnOZ7QE@google.com \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=ctshao@google.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).