From: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
To: 1f4a84e5.32ca.19730d781aa.Coremail.00107082@163.com
Cc: 00107082@163.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
leo.yan@arm.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG][6.15][perf] Kernel panic not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 16:13:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aD2/hoB+KhLITSu3@e129823.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aD2kz52p5NHpuXk3@e129823.arm.com>
Hi David,
> > > Before I start testing, I feel concerned about following chain:
> > >
> > > ./kernel/fork.c:
> > > bad_fork_cleanup_perf:
> > > perf_event_free_task()
> > > perf_free_event()
> > > list_del_event()
> > >
> > > This patch seems changes the behavior in this callchain.
> > > Would this have other side-effect?
> >
> > What behavior is changed you're worry about?
> > both error patch is handled by __perf_remove_from_context(),
> > There wouldn't be no problem since this patch just move the
> > time of disabling cgroup before changing event state.
> >
> > also, the cgroup event is for only cpuctx not added in taskctx.
> > So, there's no effect for event attached in taskctx.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> Am I reading it wrong?
> The call chain I mentioned above dose not walk through __perf_remove_from_context,
> It is a fail path in fork, which happens rarely, but still possible. I guess...
Since commit 90661365021a
("perf Unify perf_event_free_task() / perf_evenet_exit_task_context()")
perf_event_free_task() is integrated with perf_event_exit_task_context()
So, it calls __perf_remove_from_context().
In v6.15, I think you can test with below change only:
@@ -2471,6 +2459,16 @@ __perf_remove_from_context(struct perf_event *event,
ctx_time_update(cpuctx, ctx);
+ /*
+ * If event was in error state, then keep it
+ * that way, otherwise bogus counts will be
+ * returned on read(). The only way to get out
+ * of error state is by explicit re-enabling
+ * of the event
+ */
+ if (event->state > PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF)
+ perf_cgroup_event_disable(event, ctx);
+
/*
* Ensure event_sched_out() switches to OFF, at the very least
* this avoids raising perf_pending_task() at this time.
not with modification with "list_del_event()".
Thanks
--
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-02 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-02 12:06 [BUG][6.15][perf] Kernel panic not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-02 12:33 ` David Wang
2025-06-02 13:19 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-02 13:31 ` David Wang
2025-06-02 15:13 ` Yeoreum Yun [this message]
2025-06-02 15:32 ` David Wang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-06-01 17:36 David Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aD2/hoB+KhLITSu3@e129823.arm.com \
--to=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
--cc=00107082@163.com \
--cc=1f4a84e5.32ca.19730d781aa.Coremail.00107082@163.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).