From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5BC528DF29; Wed, 28 May 2025 17:43:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748454203; cv=none; b=f7WYOXbRAKNRN2AiN30xxqP3hn0I5TXcRNTKZ49BeiW7sOhiAy+RcmJxBq258ZSCeXLqqroDTIAteF2iWpruMfPISznx0UE2fblBG5yxX2cJFFzxBL7hhKTKxZNQLc1iPC/mtIacWV3UaRH6bN6rsslUE7X1T99aZFdCoKpbSZ0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748454203; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CIwIRMFWWPspYFOu0BAz//9Xigosv8kDtL+WE9KyOl0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Gfz8dRp4bj3+FZ+WjRmhB7F9B8FdFxLQEwYFzWrUC1BA5xzBkUSOp+kAxd9/ujHXKhOiprjWiMOc/9CHPwbhscY4MgkF68uB30iJ2ey3a4+v/WqB/p2WmqEdh4QgHmoq4O+OXaVP+QSDhix6okZSP5A+jdVbGzAwi1iw1J8M/E8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=CS+iMhJw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="CS+iMhJw" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E524DC4CEE3; Wed, 28 May 2025 17:43:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1748454202; bh=CIwIRMFWWPspYFOu0BAz//9Xigosv8kDtL+WE9KyOl0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=CS+iMhJwT/6lflEALZmsRKey2NAtkT/8TgnMmSfBwJwzgm0FihTDdFdzaDfKhS1DC RHYcZXFzX17fA/uvh6KZJENrkgRaNZbDbQcOW4LY6oAPRoRGX7HYheB9FJ0xrtwQSj i9fdEFquZZ23RoexgOlXfh/zc+o0BHmfT9EFHAvycsJ/KHEI8WC9LraOdQH0b28cDV U/PD2JvQLqxgwgip/sdF2/P2/TNXm/YdwHBBy59146ZSRdnT5hoXkPSR/UfBy3XRn6 eC/wjFFnttEzrMUJe/Qg5q+mS4eaYxW+yozK4m4CJamISFdp2jGgHyfqS4eNqvU/q+ TMLU1kCUD3SfA== Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 14:43:19 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Leo Yan Cc: Namhyung Kim , Ian Rogers , Kan Liang , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , LKML , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Ravi Bangoria , Stephane Eranian Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf mem: Describe overhead calculation in brief Message-ID: References: <20250523222157.1259998-1-namhyung@kernel.org> <20250527101246.GG2566836@e132581.arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250527101246.GG2566836@e132581.arm.com> On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 11:12:46AM +0100, Leo Yan wrote: > On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 03:21:55PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > From: Ravi Bangoria > > > > Unlike perf-report which uses sample period for overhead calculation, > > perf-mem overhead is calculated using sample weight. Describe perf-mem > > overhead calculation method in it's man page. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria > > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim > > For whole series: > > Reviewed-by: Leo Yan Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next, - Arnaldo