From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Jean-Philippe Romain <jean-philippe.romain@foss.st.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf pfm: Don't force loading of all PMUs
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 13:28:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aIKXa4LOIq5MyuS7@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250722013449.146233-1-irogers@google.com>
On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 06:34:49PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Force loading all PMUs adds significant cost because DRM and other
> PMUs are loaded, it should also not be required if the pmus__
> functions are used.
>
> Tested by run perf test, in particular the pfm related tests. Also
> `perf list` is identical before and after.
I've also checked it with timing. I'll add this to the commit message.
Before:
$ time ./perf test pfm
54: Test libpfm4 support :
54.1: test of individual --pfm-events : Ok
54.2: test groups of --pfm-events : Ok
103: perf all libpfm4 events test : Ok
real 0m8.933s
user 0m1.824s
sys 0m7.122s
After:
$ time ./perf test pfm
54: Test libpfm4 support :
54.1: test of individual --pfm-events : Ok
54.2: test groups of --pfm-events : Ok
103: perf all libpfm4 events test : Ok
real 0m5.259s
user 0m1.793s
sys 0m3.570s
Tested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/pfm.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pfm.c b/tools/perf/util/pfm.c
> index 0dacc133ed39..e89395814e88 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/pfm.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/pfm.c
> @@ -47,10 +47,6 @@ int parse_libpfm_events_option(const struct option *opt, const char *str,
> p_orig = p = strdup(str);
> if (!p)
> return -1;
> - /*
> - * force loading of the PMU list
> - */
> - perf_pmus__scan(NULL);
>
> for (q = p; strsep(&p, ",{}"); q = p) {
> sep = p ? str + (p - p_orig - 1) : "";
> --
> 2.50.0.727.gbf7dc18ff4-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-24 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-22 1:34 [PATCH v1] perf pfm: Don't force loading of all PMUs Ian Rogers
2025-07-24 20:28 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2025-07-25 18:48 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aIKXa4LOIq5MyuS7@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jean-philippe.romain@foss.st.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).