From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] perf annotate: Remove __annotation_line__write()
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 11:42:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aIfEogcWn3yvv-Pq@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fVG6q37_tVvFo12OCiiE4zu0fqkf_3Z1rmoanVLXR7DOA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 05:20:28PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 12:38 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Get rid of the internal function and convert function arguments into
> > local variables if they are used more than once.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++----------------------
> > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> > index 0dd475a744b6dfac..69ee83052396b15e 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> > @@ -1935,24 +1935,26 @@ int annotation_br_cntr_entry(char **str, int br_cntr_nr,
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > }
> >
> > -static void __annotation_line__write(struct annotation_line *al, struct annotation *notes,
> > - bool first_line, bool current_entry, bool change_color, int width,
> > - void *obj, unsigned int percent_type,
> > - int (*obj__set_color)(void *obj, int color),
> > - void (*obj__set_percent_color)(void *obj, double percent, bool current),
> > - int (*obj__set_jumps_percent_color)(void *obj, int nr, bool current),
> > - void (*obj__printf)(void *obj, const char *fmt, ...),
> > - void (*obj__write_graph)(void *obj, int graph))
> > -
> > -{
> > - double percent_max = annotation_line__max_percent(al, percent_type);
> > - int pcnt_width = annotation__pcnt_width(notes),
> > - cycles_width = annotation__cycles_width(notes);
> > +void annotation_line__write(struct annotation_line *al, struct annotation *notes,
> > + struct annotation_write_ops *wops)
>
> nit: constify wops? If its const are the local variables worth it?
Sure, I think it's good.
Thanks,
Namhyung
> > +{
> > + bool current_entry = wops->current_entry;
> > + bool change_color = wops->change_color;
> > + double percent_max = annotation_line__max_percent(al, annotate_opts.percent_type);
> > + int width = wops->width;
> > + int pcnt_width = annotation__pcnt_width(notes);
> > + int cycles_width = annotation__cycles_width(notes);
> > bool show_title = false;
> > char bf[256];
> > int printed;
> > -
> > - if (first_line && (al->offset == -1 || percent_max == 0.0)) {
> > + void *obj = wops->obj;
> > + int (*obj__set_color)(void *obj, int color) = wops->set_color;
> > + void (*obj__set_percent_color)(void *obj, double percent, bool current) = wops->set_percent_color;
> > + int (*obj__set_jumps_percent_color)(void *obj, int nr, bool current) = wops->set_jumps_percent_color;
> > + void (*obj__printf)(void *obj, const char *fmt, ...) = wops->printf;
> > + void (*obj__write_graph)(void *obj, int graph) = wops->write_graph;
> > +
> > + if (wops->first_line && (al->offset == -1 || percent_max == 0.0)) {
> > if (notes->branch && al->cycles) {
> > if (al->cycles->ipc == 0.0 && al->cycles->avg == 0)
> > show_title = true;
> > @@ -1966,7 +1968,8 @@ static void __annotation_line__write(struct annotation_line *al, struct annotati
> > for (i = 0; i < al->data_nr; i++) {
> > double percent;
> >
> > - percent = annotation_data__percent(&al->data[i], percent_type);
> > + percent = annotation_data__percent(&al->data[i],
> > + annotate_opts.percent_type);
> >
> > obj__set_percent_color(obj, percent, current_entry);
> > if (symbol_conf.show_total_period) {
> > @@ -2115,17 +2118,6 @@ static void __annotation_line__write(struct annotation_line *al, struct annotati
> >
> > }
> >
> > -void annotation_line__write(struct annotation_line *al, struct annotation *notes,
> > - struct annotation_write_ops *wops)
> > -{
> > - __annotation_line__write(al, notes, wops->first_line, wops->current_entry,
> > - wops->change_color, wops->width, wops->obj,
> > - annotate_opts.percent_type,
> > - wops->set_color, wops->set_percent_color,
> > - wops->set_jumps_percent_color, wops->printf,
> > - wops->write_graph);
> > -}
> > -
> > int symbol__annotate2(struct map_symbol *ms, struct evsel *evsel,
> > struct arch **parch)
> > {
> > --
> > 2.50.1
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-28 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-25 19:37 [PATCHSET v4 0/9] perf annotate: Support --code-with-type on TUI Namhyung Kim
2025-07-25 19:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] perf annotate: Rename to __hist_entry__tui_annotate() Namhyung Kim
2025-07-26 0:16 ` Ian Rogers
2025-07-28 18:39 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-07-25 19:37 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] perf annotate: Remove __annotation_line__write() Namhyung Kim
2025-07-26 0:20 ` Ian Rogers
2025-07-28 18:42 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2025-07-25 19:37 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] perf annotate: Pass annotation_print_data to annotation_line__write() Namhyung Kim
2025-07-26 0:23 ` Ian Rogers
2025-07-28 18:44 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-07-25 19:37 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] perf annotate: Simplify width calculation in annotation_line__write() Namhyung Kim
2025-07-26 0:30 ` Ian Rogers
2025-07-28 18:47 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-07-25 19:37 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] perf annotate: Add --code-with-type support for TUI Namhyung Kim
2025-07-26 0:31 ` Ian Rogers
2025-07-28 18:47 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-07-25 19:37 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] perf annotate: Add 'T' hot key to toggle data type display Namhyung Kim
2025-07-26 0:34 ` Ian Rogers
2025-07-25 19:37 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] perf annotate: Show warning when debuginfo is not available Namhyung Kim
2025-07-26 0:38 ` Ian Rogers
2025-07-25 19:37 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] perf annotate: Hide data-type for stack operation and canary Namhyung Kim
2025-07-26 0:44 ` Ian Rogers
2025-07-28 18:51 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-07-25 19:37 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] perf annotate: Add dso__debuginfo() helper Namhyung Kim
2025-07-26 0:46 ` Ian Rogers
2025-07-28 18:54 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aIfEogcWn3yvv-Pq@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).