From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: hupu <hupu.gm@gmail.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, irogers@google.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, justinstitt@google.com, leo.yan@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, mingo@redhat.com, morbo@google.com,
nathan@kernel.org, nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com,
peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf build: Support passing extra Clang options via EXTRA_BPF_FLAGS
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 13:16:46 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPW3rilb8DtFDIMC@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251020024049.6877-1-hupu.gm@gmail.com>
On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 10:40:49AM +0800, hupu wrote:
> When cross-compiling perf with BPF enabled, Clang is invoked during the
> build. Some cross-compilation environments require additional compiler
> options, such as `--sysroot` or custom include paths.
>
> This patch introduces a new Make variable, `EXTRA_BPF_FLAGS`. During BPF
> skeleton builds, it appends user-provided options to `CLANG_OPTIONS`,
> allowing extra Clang flags to be set without modifying Makefile.perf
> directly.
>
> Example usage:
> EXTRA_BPF_FLAGS="--sysroot=$SYSROOT"
> make perf ARCH="$ARCH" EXTRA_BPF_FLAGS="$EXTRA_BPF_FLAGS"
Why not just:
make perf ARCH="arm64" EXTRA_BPF_FLAGS="--sysroot=..."
>
> Change history:
> v2:
> - Rename EXTRA_CLANG_FLAGS to EXTRA_BPF_FLAGS
> - Update commit message
> v1:
> - Introduce EXTRA_CLANG_FLAGS to allow passing extra Clang options
>
> Signed-off-by: hupu <hupu.gm@gmail.com>
Leo, are you ok with this?
> ---
> tools/perf/Makefile.perf | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile.perf b/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
> index 47c906b807ef..f1f2efdbab8c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
> +++ b/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
> @@ -1249,6 +1249,11 @@ else
> $(Q)cp "$(VMLINUX_H)" $@
> endif
>
> +# Allow users to specify additional Clang options (e.g. --sysroot)
> +# when cross-compiling BPF skeletons, enabling more flexible
> +# build configurations.
Can you please move this comment or add new one at the top of the file
along with EXTRA_CFLAGS?
Thanks,
Namhyung
> +CLANG_OPTIONS += $(EXTRA_BPF_FLAGS)
> +
> $(SKEL_TMP_OUT)/%.bpf.o: $(OUTPUT)PERF-VERSION-FILE util/bpf_skel/perf_version.h | $(SKEL_TMP_OUT)
> $(SKEL_TMP_OUT)/%.bpf.o: util/bpf_skel/%.bpf.c $(LIBBPF) $(SKEL_OUT)/vmlinux.h
> $(QUIET_CLANG)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -fno-stack-protector --target=bpf \
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-20 4:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-13 8:06 [RFC] perf build: Allow passing extra Clang flags via EXTRA_CLANG_FLAGS hupu
2025-10-13 8:07 ` hupu
2025-10-13 15:46 ` Ian Rogers
2025-10-13 16:14 ` Leo Yan
2025-10-14 2:31 ` hupu
2025-10-15 9:30 ` Leo Yan
2025-10-15 11:47 ` hupu
2025-10-15 12:55 ` Leo Yan
2025-10-18 10:05 ` hupu
2025-10-19 2:30 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-10-19 7:57 ` hupu
2025-10-20 1:16 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-10-20 2:38 ` hupu
2025-10-20 2:40 ` [PATCH] perf build: Support passing extra Clang options via EXTRA_BPF_FLAGS hupu
2025-10-20 4:16 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2025-10-20 8:00 ` hupu
2025-10-20 8:02 ` hupu
2025-10-20 10:15 ` Leo Yan
2025-10-20 12:51 ` hupu
2025-10-20 13:02 ` hupu
2025-10-21 3:11 ` hupu
2025-11-18 7:18 ` hupu
2025-11-18 7:28 ` hupu
2025-11-19 9:43 ` hupu
2025-11-20 19:22 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-11-21 10:17 ` hupu
2025-11-24 7:26 ` hupu
2025-11-24 7:34 ` hupu
2025-11-25 8:13 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-11-25 12:52 ` hupu
2025-11-25 13:07 ` hupu
2025-11-25 16:10 ` Leo Yan
2025-11-26 13:44 ` hupu
2025-12-05 6:33 ` hupu
2025-12-08 9:05 ` hupu
2025-12-10 10:24 ` hupu
2025-12-11 10:39 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-12 6:12 ` hupu
2025-10-20 13:50 ` Leo Yan
2025-10-20 2:45 ` hupu
2025-10-14 1:57 ` [RFC] perf build: Allow passing extra Clang flags via EXTRA_CLANG_FLAGS hupu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPW3rilb8DtFDIMC@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hupu.gm@gmail.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).