linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Tycho Andersen <tycho@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Santosh Shukla <santosh.shukla@amd.com>,
	Ananth Narayan <ananth.narayan@amd.com>,
	Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] perf lock contention: Assorted fixes
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 17:30:35 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRY_6-xqgMp4-vid@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fVNZW5EvpX+MCQOU1WJ0BeyDudk+nMp8-cAH6CfF9cE+g@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 08:57:40AM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 8:03 AM Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com> wrote:
> >
> > o Patch 1 resolves a segmentation fault in both "perf lock report"
> >   and "perf lock contention".
> > o Patch 2 repairs the perf-lock unit test.
 
> Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>

Thanks, tested, reproduced the segfault and the fix for it, applied to
perf-tools,

- Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-13 20:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-13 16:01 [PATCH 0/2] perf lock contention: Assorted fixes Ravi Bangoria
2025-11-13 16:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf lock: Fix segfault due to missing kernel map Ravi Bangoria
2025-11-13 16:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf test: Fix lock contention test Ravi Bangoria
2025-11-13 16:57 ` [PATCH 0/2] perf lock contention: Assorted fixes Ian Rogers
2025-11-13 20:30   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2025-11-14  7:15 ` Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aRY_6-xqgMp4-vid@x1 \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ananth.narayan@amd.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
    --cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
    --cc=tycho@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).