From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BF6935975; Thu, 13 Nov 2025 20:30:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763065838; cv=none; b=cKsFwpOC0ds0Sna+T0jJC+mr7NmqCMZdcQK//92o/tLahc/7LmgBoFw7WZxf6mweWftO9EjD8NSi+KCiuBdQbiy0GChmlPHy4iLkTk2GfR3XqLrCMTX6H/PP3NvTXdmos+NLJL1IYV4cjs5XbgjIKzucfjgG1r0gCoyR7VT4hwc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763065838; c=relaxed/simple; bh=We3zn8RXbL+6odnj8ZF9KfEYh1rZdYD/VhJmX5sCcYM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=PeSQEfdl1LAB7Y2wQ1sFtbeKGUqSA8055ACk4izy9V1X09nxYBEbs1fG56KOOvEKFMMc0mTHxLCouHeMuBN0oBfT2fG0Oxg0r78+Igiryn0m8ub3enQxVvbvJjreof6SiL5gagy/ipcu3k0Du/OhbEaCfcFVokg95Rfznuizh+0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=fHZwMKrR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="fHZwMKrR" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AAA2FC4CEF5; Thu, 13 Nov 2025 20:30:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1763065838; bh=We3zn8RXbL+6odnj8ZF9KfEYh1rZdYD/VhJmX5sCcYM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=fHZwMKrRTK0+SEOqpLNIwwp7lNBmC5dWW/8GGPbIAZc45fUK1cmZW+4jwkzEvUuTK 8oIgdkSyHrb7ZTJ7kt3PWz5dtshfi+idnkptm8YG3GLOVP6hMMJCWVE7LghBMs0toc p8ToA1DNs7j/hf2yZLA7/tnOs05KOAVp/8PPkHsRIvnVQ2H18z75DR+DRqe4YnhY8K 6SYNfiY8Ono/WJptgvmnQXgxnuX41a9exL1gcQng+/7irMBXNWKXo00hB4aJOVr1bb yK6QB4Lxpb6TKP6oW7MN+ogbWal5EHSr6sfBoOZmI1nP0o/TvDdVd0RHPGvPR5JQ9v 2ZH846R0vD5dg== Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 17:30:35 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ian Rogers Cc: Ravi Bangoria , Namhyung Kim , Tycho Andersen , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , James Clark , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Santosh Shukla , Ananth Narayan , Sandipan Das Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] perf lock contention: Assorted fixes Message-ID: References: <20251113160124.2695-1-ravi.bangoria@amd.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 08:57:40AM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 8:03 AM Ravi Bangoria wrote: > > > > o Patch 1 resolves a segmentation fault in both "perf lock report" > > and "perf lock contention". > > o Patch 2 repairs the perf-lock unit test. > Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers Thanks, tested, reproduced the segfault and the fix for it, applied to perf-tools, - Arnaldo