linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@treblig.org>,
	Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>,
	James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
	Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
	Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] perf stat: Read tool events last
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 18:35:17 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRvbZbhcsjpCXiAU@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251113180517.44096-10-irogers@google.com>

On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 10:05:15AM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> When reading a metric like memory bandwidth on multiple sockets, the
> additional sockets will be on CPUS > 0. Because of the affinity
> reading, the counters are read on CPU 0 along with the time, then the
> later sockets are read. This can lead to the later sockets having a
> bandwidth larger than is possible for the period of time. To avoid
> this moving the reading of tool events to occur after all other events
> are read.

Can you move this change before the affinity updates?  I think it's
straight-forward and can be applied independently.

Thanks,
Namhyung

> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  tools/perf/util/evlist.c  |  4 ----
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> index 947f11b8b106..aec93b91fd11 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> @@ -379,6 +379,9 @@ static int read_counters_with_affinity(void)
>  		if (evsel__is_bpf(counter))
>  			continue;
>  
> +		if (evsel__is_tool(counter))
> +			continue;
> +
>  		if (!counter->err)
>  			counter->err = read_counter_cpu(counter, evlist_cpu_itr.cpu_map_idx);
>  	}
> @@ -402,6 +405,24 @@ static int read_bpf_map_counters(void)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int read_tool_counters(void)
> +{
> +	struct evsel *counter;
> +
> +	evlist__for_each_entry(evsel_list, counter) {
> +		int idx;
> +
> +		if (!evsel__is_tool(counter))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		perf_cpu_map__for_each_idx(idx, counter->core.cpus) {
> +			if (!counter->err)
> +				counter->err = read_counter_cpu(counter, idx);
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int read_counters(void)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> @@ -415,7 +436,13 @@ static int read_counters(void)
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	// Read non-BPF and non-tool counters next.
> -	return read_counters_with_affinity();
> +	ret = read_counters_with_affinity();
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	// Read the tool counters last. This way the duration_time counter
> +	// should always be greater than any other counter's enabled time.
> +	return read_tool_counters();
>  }
>  
>  static void process_counters(void)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> index b6df81b8a236..fc3dae7cdfca 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> @@ -368,10 +368,6 @@ static bool evlist__use_affinity(struct evlist *evlist)
>  	struct perf_cpu_map *used_cpus = NULL;
>  	bool ret = false;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * With perf record core.user_requested_cpus is usually NULL.
> -	 * Use the old method to handle this for now.
> -	 */
>  	if (!evlist->core.user_requested_cpus ||
>  	    cpu_map__is_dummy(evlist->core.user_requested_cpus))
>  		return false;
> -- 
> 2.51.2.1041.gc1ab5b90ca-goog
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-18  2:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-13 18:05 [PATCH v4 00/10] perf stat fixes and improvements Ian Rogers
2025-11-13 18:05 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] libperf cpumap: Reduce allocations and sorting in intersect Ian Rogers
2025-11-13 18:05 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] perf pmu: perf_cpu_map__new_int to avoid parsing a string Ian Rogers
2025-11-13 18:05 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] perf tool_pmu: Use old_count when computing count values for time events Ian Rogers
2025-11-13 18:05 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] perf stat-shadow: Read tool events directly Ian Rogers
2025-11-18  2:30   ` Namhyung Kim
2025-11-18  4:36     ` Ian Rogers
2025-11-18  6:45       ` Namhyung Kim
2025-11-13 18:05 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] perf stat: Reduce scope of ru_stats Ian Rogers
2025-11-18  2:31   ` Namhyung Kim
2025-11-13 18:05 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] perf stat: Reduce scope of walltime_nsecs_stats Ian Rogers
2025-11-13 18:05 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] perf tool_pmu: More accurately set the cpus for tool events Ian Rogers
2025-11-13 18:05 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] perf evlist: Reduce affinity use and move into iterator, fix no affinity Ian Rogers
2025-11-13 18:05 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] perf stat: Read tool events last Ian Rogers
2025-11-18  2:35   ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2025-11-18  4:38     ` Ian Rogers
2025-11-18  6:46       ` Namhyung Kim
2025-11-13 18:05 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] perf stat: Add no-affinity flag Ian Rogers
2025-11-18  2:40   ` Namhyung Kim
2025-11-18  4:32     ` Ian Rogers
2025-11-18  6:50       ` Namhyung Kim
2025-11-18 18:00 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] perf stat fixes and improvements Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aRvbZbhcsjpCXiAU@google.com \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@treblig.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
    --cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).