From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5270F1E7C08; Tue, 2 Dec 2025 04:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764650738; cv=none; b=jI0faStZhJGHG+BQzRZDeeU1CAw2MgV/yMS7CbPJl+W48yi2pZ29iDiDBLrC/Qq2eoR/74XZ4p8UHGc+GbwfDHsiGJWV2VRSDQIJmJtwoa8oNFvbH+l5Sx+LAH5hlon+B7tMPC8Hm/dhlrgLOxhoYOnG64fXAM0YUUbnA8oXamc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764650738; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xA9fCVj9cAF3TgJoyv2A3iCV6Ovgc0j6hj3/OWH0q50=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=OnRc3bhUXxz1PYU1W/rC+DADUEPR05aCy3pIORQ28H3n0NS097g2wRwmNC0XIGVSMF+6+HthnaKqh1hJ2IQB3FOoFGgl0x/KYIqKzxFsTkFEb3B0vi0sjvRh/P51yaQH2VzrKZVdmDodnF7mLJx0+UwmjCgsRPC6od767ZvQgVM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=qxN6aFOl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="qxN6aFOl" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39DFBC4CEF1; Tue, 2 Dec 2025 04:45:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1764650737; bh=xA9fCVj9cAF3TgJoyv2A3iCV6Ovgc0j6hj3/OWH0q50=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=qxN6aFOlzUCwMYEBYQTMpG2yua/Z3VyZ1KVPR53E+JxFIgamsN3jTZn9YjB5/8I4e vNg4MaWi5J8mr3M5A2iu9/aF+HdNr8bRrVRmCVumucG5H0yahF7LjUa1DOjQEVSsxq RzxDp2jn5AcvU14JsKym1B9EGaDaxuplztU5PsGFqyfBu8pIQ1eLoGDLf+2vSOtpS5 Ku4d+yAcss0JqiSpL4Yfkl0zP6pCblTdzyxbECierHYLF5tHARnHZAGgKYM7MepFSW 5H0ZsepdwshVDU/C2Tcd3RVeG2olrJQq7oHaCd8icYTgGsdleMXAfuXU+Ef+/0WLXl vI0mhsoZA152A== Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 05:45:32 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Ian Rogers Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Namhyung Kim , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , James Clark , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] perf stat: Allow no events to open if this is a "--null" run Message-ID: References: <20251201230904.290733-1-irogers@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: * Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > Note that without the cpumask workaround patch I sent > > 'perf stat --null' still segfaults on perf-tools-next > > even with the above patch applied - I suppose that's > > expected, right? > > Ignore me, I just saw your fix series: > > git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git perf-tools-next With all 4 patches applied to v6.18 'perf stat --null' works fine: Tested-by: Ingo Molnar Thanks, Ingo