From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFCDAE571; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 20:22:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764015758; cv=none; b=bOtmgFSvGaoApxnalco6RSJ1eQt7u+kdr8+9UhhGvgKVQrSggHb0fbyAN+RUcV8cNV3By42bmq3jfpXPZrZrfgHZb3PI/ckA/6If9LHE1jIl1eyQDm2yu6MalzAd0hlmTXQnNmb+tqTqvxOU6O9Gotdjc2u+f/d/JhlvOY/FLz4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764015758; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9cpV3hPEcSWt2nP+SqAQdVTrzwYE61khh6jlE/4yyzg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=JmWIGSiKArlppa9C94nq9B89JfAgS5sECRuKn6OsUn02zq/8EUFu8lIwU1hcilTH1YFbIbSf6UFjEPs6ztLnrumqgMcJ+ECtY/CZaqxYKrSy7vDYXBLCvqlsGSeGQaUqic6kgQVNonURmfY8f9H/atEa4+GCXUzqAc+mXtrVvOw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=SalgsBAC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="SalgsBAC" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F06D4C4CEF1; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 20:22:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1764015758; bh=9cpV3hPEcSWt2nP+SqAQdVTrzwYE61khh6jlE/4yyzg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=SalgsBACiW5P7RPLORYJOxDVrJb9AkDxWVSorKzlZFq18qq95ztJJ0veXEWLrIcV1 hAr3f/rJF0zah8tv8t4gZC6MjfAp+IqPScfGXB2/rRUST4UbIJqQgo5v1z2bJHe7VX XWK7HiVxhJ0ucu76I7IMm+SdaD3RYSdpRNptn/lWN9s5SVKTH7B27WavFU69Ajxwwz lWumUQNXmy8ZOARxpjrDRHYeeGjF8At/0VOf1wX9YlgCiCP7JsgTVTIW+D1pjVCTEu MxDsyLxWr5/ByzSrKRIoFycwfLUXUBBFSjGT5V6DDaluTHWJNxQOzMeIpSjADp4bS/ 1+W4SbDN5sHig== Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 12:22:36 -0800 From: Namhyung Kim To: Anubhav Shelat Cc: Ian Rogers , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , Thomas Falcon , Howard Chu , James Clark , Zhongqiu Han , Ravi Bangoria , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] perf pmu: Add PMU kind to simplify differentiating Message-ID: References: <20251114220547.496562-1-irogers@google.com> <20251114220547.496562-2-irogers@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Hello, On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 12:34:11PM +0000, Anubhav Shelat wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 10:06 PM Ian Rogers wrote: > > +static inline enum pmu_kind perf_pmu__kind(const struct perf_pmu *pmu) > > +{ > > + __u32 type; > > + > > + if (!pmu) > > + return PERF_PMU_KIND_PE; > > + > > + type = pmu->type; > > + if (type <= PERF_PMU_TYPE_PE_END) > > + return PERF_PMU_KIND_PE; > > + if (type <= PERF_PMU_TYPE_DRM_END) > > + return PERF_PMU_KIND_DRM; > > + if (type <= PERF_PMU_TYPE_DRM_END) > > + return PERF_PMU_KIND_DRM; > > + if (type <= PERF_PMU_TYPE_HWMON_END) > > + return PERF_PMU_KIND_HWMON; > > + if (type == PERF_PMU_TYPE_TOOL) > > + return PERF_PMU_KIND_TOOL; > > + return PERF_PMU_KIND_FAKE; > > +} > > + > > Looks like there's a duplicate check for PERF_PMU_TYPE_DRM_END. Right, can you please send a fix? Thanks, Namhyung