From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72AB632ABC0; Wed, 17 Dec 2025 12:37:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765975074; cv=none; b=uxrnyrmtiSlgnC/fJZs43v/bDl+3GW/UKJQp6XwNRDD5+GDCCszinveyJIgPmF7MVB8lKwxuOvGAocLtbo650jsJJ8VCGxFA4lQLKLztKxnQmj/fT+h9UZAsIVa4EKSVRJuBnZVQfH/mAmIq2cC9RSELTMLZb6XXKMoyU2qZAgs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765975074; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ou9Z3js+881lhZms28WvEv8+3fWb8COxwAvUIb3Y6eg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dxTPA8vVZ9Qt0lOAQMa/oSFI3HcRPCheMQqgFyRPvIqdJAPmizsYNgxuSYI37+dkhBZpxpYMtXNxvcabRWm8+p0ABY998MwcH2F3wUIOAe1+X5v3KUaYFtlnolaPNDdccNLEbS3IEra0258VvnjDm/LP7JDrg2ksZeqRNtAeVPo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ri6sLOgi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ri6sLOgi" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9D25C4CEF5; Wed, 17 Dec 2025 12:37:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1765975074; bh=ou9Z3js+881lhZms28WvEv8+3fWb8COxwAvUIb3Y6eg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ri6sLOgi0lf6bdQJUQ9mb0GNweroxafzDgTvHhiP8mDGpthvdOmdNvfKznW9rHSuW teml1rwHmdrlGMlvqblAUWZcrIMmnX7JThc5qt6+DR45zjn4XvVYZXn1tYKy0GwvAF hE51gotS8Hyb9WtRzbEs913j7hYsJniUVNeruXHvZV6c7OjnSv785cmdFJF9P9c87r Adfit8xMRn0Gofd85WWk/OoXLwhjs/JSiknv3mFIvjjPPy9Kf2tV2xBvryzI9azGen +gk3LFzJLvfEd8pxJhkuqGYTwWsoBE0hqJ4wvm/E5YFSGWDHkopHwjmzQZ85DmXCez DWWfRiHwyxf0g== Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 09:37:51 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ian Rogers Cc: Namhyung Kim , James Clark , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , LKML , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] perf record: Split --data-mmap option Message-ID: References: <20251210023327.1669863-1-namhyung@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 02:05:23PM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote: > On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 6:33 PM Namhyung Kim wrote: > > > > Currently -d/--data option controls both PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR bit and > > perf_event_attr.mmap_data flag. Separate them using new --data-mmap > > option to support recording only one of them. > > > > For data-type profiling, data MMAP is unnecessary but it wastes a lot > > of space in the ring buffer and data file. > > > > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim > > Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers Tested the series and applied to perf-tools-next (6.20), Thanks, - Arnaldo