From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60069194C96; Tue, 6 Jan 2026 21:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767735819; cv=none; b=EXmmpaCX9bPma+h5p2LM5VWccDNjNXtbW6k56Wxm/gWXwpIDhMO3vM32upZqbM5yCGLPXgh8lq4kYf3KCxlHR788kyZGJYrOvS2W4iArfl369Bs7KyVhddjYZPIRWATBL7fdxQi8eArmSIxx0ZyBKS73ZBr2E6Ai9Wf0emeiOC4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767735819; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hUHsHh3FbOTEb3Y9hs5Fw2NpxjDFWmCSLXCPJmeq4FQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=oV6bea+LGRdgd91UtaCc6rVg//lS9CZ7B642eVkljAZ8eKFh9uEOkR7YzrNQBWrwayaSLVdZrcgsflWXO5hHfODN5ukpvJB1lJ2RrSYJ1LWeuCSXejFlNt72XZjegl7EQk527luUB6GBRgUtCUgF91AH9u+9VaDqmgNYaWwq94M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OlWubsDj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OlWubsDj" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C792C116C6; Tue, 6 Jan 2026 21:43:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1767735819; bh=hUHsHh3FbOTEb3Y9hs5Fw2NpxjDFWmCSLXCPJmeq4FQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=OlWubsDj4lQBSprNxvhsNImCqdrbDMVJTRmXDXcfeIOGfmJ3WpQ/0na+7ObpWwgp9 nnatXlhNTCBda1TOItyJML5HGAW2KDR7+fetzJO5JIooQWg3yScRk7dgoudMG0J6ge lZkMORaoW/XDnzs3YduJoRv3okldL0oTBz+n2NqBesnI1hD07okS0HN/dAuQefMfHi iU+BqAMLLqHTc5mRCiDhZTHLZk/1fCFpE3UutIxVIoIDD8X2yiWy1LNw8rpvi9frp5 91x4UiPUOzmy1jjbVAvwpF+HSJ13TZdzdGdhvo/hmqjobT8kbZOgIzoON4y7dFMjGe lP19m88H10gzA== Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 18:43:34 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ian Rogers Cc: Thomas Richter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, agordeev@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, sumanthk@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, japo@linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf test: Fix test case perf evlist tests for s390x Message-ID: References: <20251210071752.4160369-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 10:35:01AM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote: > On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 11:18 PM Thomas Richter wrote: > > > > Perf test case 78: perf evlist tests fails on s390. The failure > > is causes by grouping events cycles and instructions because > > sampling does only support event cycles. > > Change the group to software events to fix this. > > > > Output before: > > # ./perf test 78 > > 78: perf evlist tests : FAILED! > > # > > > > Output after: > > # ./perf test 78 > > 78: perf evlist tests : Ok > > # > > > > Fixes: db452961de939 ("perf tests evlist: Add basic evlist test") > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter > > Tested-by: Ian Rogers Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next, - Arnaldo