From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>, Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf test java symbol: Additional libperf-jvmti.so path check
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 19:06:42 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aV2HchAKw8gDc74m@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251205190135.210864-1-irogers@google.com>
On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 11:01:35AM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> If perf is built into an output directory then so is
> libperf-jvmti.so. If `perf test` is run from that directory then PWD
> needn't also be that directory meaning libperf-jvmti.so won't be found
> and the test skipped. Add an additional check for libperf-jvmti.so in
> the same directory as the perf binary for this case, this avoids the
> test skipping.
Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next,
- Arnaldo
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/shell/test_java_symbol.sh | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_java_symbol.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_java_symbol.sh
> index 499539d1c479..63a2cc9bf13f 100755
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_java_symbol.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_java_symbol.sh
> @@ -22,10 +22,13 @@ cleanup_files()
>
> trap cleanup_files exit term int
>
> +PERF_DIR=$(dirname "$(which perf)")
> if [ -e "$PWD/tools/perf/libperf-jvmti.so" ]; then
> LIBJVMTI=$PWD/tools/perf/libperf-jvmti.so
> elif [ -e "$PWD/libperf-jvmti.so" ]; then
> LIBJVMTI=$PWD/libperf-jvmti.so
> +elif [ -e "$PERF_DIR/libperf-jvmti.so" ]; then
> + LIBJVMTI=$PERF_DIR/libperf-jvmti.so
> elif [ -e "$PREFIX/lib64/libperf-jvmti.so" ]; then
> LIBJVMTI=$PREFIX/lib64/libperf-jvmti.so
> elif [ -e "$PREFIX/lib/libperf-jvmti.so" ]; then
> @@ -34,6 +37,7 @@ elif [ -e "/usr/lib/linux-tools-$(uname -a | awk '{ print $3 }' | sed -r 's/-gen
> LIBJVMTI=/usr/lib/linux-tools-$(uname -a | awk '{ print $3 }' | sed -r 's/-generic//')/libperf-jvmti.so
> else
> echo "Fail to find libperf-jvmti.so"
> +
> # JVMTI is a build option, skip the test if fail to find lib
> exit 2
> fi
> --
> 2.52.0.223.gf5cc29aaa4-goog
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-06 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-05 19:01 [PATCH v1] perf test java symbol: Additional libperf-jvmti.so path check Ian Rogers
2026-01-06 22:06 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aV2HchAKw8gDc74m@x1 \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox