From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2AE92C235E; Mon, 26 Jan 2026 20:34:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769459681; cv=none; b=K3g3fht1IxDwVJEZAShQY20ZBOU2W/dWwHwYzK6dqpfG5PXK7De6MPCat+kRFzkvZICb/1TmnsfgLSaSuS16o4l7rUoqWcYYRqS1pIieut8A4sGeA5YE/gAur+QuuLDxJdal73R5UMmx+0pKPbQU7uh5h15kmYaf4oRyo5+1DHQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769459681; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0DaUJEWw095etmaVpAYNdkX2gtyRy/7Z9hThXSMPvVc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=g0C3Oms4alkwUfsH1LsofAX08okwo5QSBjxGcHZE8DJBUn/na4RRJIzMf4KYzeI6fHEs3OM/h71OVbVOiyyPSmQXGGB1+gBAOLjh48YYnctI61Uge4poQdnS9iKLpymG4RSRCWcpzfaN9onMEIus7K/OVc8+eu3eZnhJkTq/mYw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=i5oE0pSP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="i5oE0pSP" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 353F9C2BC87; Mon, 26 Jan 2026 20:34:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1769459680; bh=0DaUJEWw095etmaVpAYNdkX2gtyRy/7Z9hThXSMPvVc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=i5oE0pSPRjjAMJarHMW4ZM3DN+qiRdLKyWu5aFpTypspaKZrbNCV+6SVpBhd8HoeN xs+pDTm6SUTpsdK+i2Fj6dg7GgLJaJCBIxI2LD7lC6QcAtzwEilzAPl9aBDWr+4NTG pgpy2PHstfM7cqk4nePRLEEZJRtMZZbUls/5ai0fOLVu816Qt14IAsCDvbernF2rCS zdf21NmlC4nr1RMIeFHbCkAUuZ/cgwS3Mxkhep99DIiETZuyiSEV/UZfUp9WHcRjyp W6qebzXtUvcDUqusab5YB0oAseJflzqZp+LJ47e5maFCujooRPR3yYgT92ZZqaB/Bd qajk8fGUQNWxQ== Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 17:34:37 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ian Rogers Cc: Thomas Richter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, agordeev@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, sumanthk@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, japo@linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] perf test: Fix test perf evlist for z/VM s390x Message-ID: References: <20260126101823.2090077-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 09:42:54AM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 2:18 AM Thomas Richter wrote: > > > > Perf test case 'perf evlist tests' fails on z/VM machines on s390. > > > > The failure is causes by event cycles. This event is not available > > on virtualized machines like z/VM on s390. > > Change to software event cpu-clock to fix this. > > > > Output before: > > # ./perf test 78 > > 79: perf evlist tests : FAILED! > > # > > > > Output after: > > # ./perf test 78 > > 79: perf evlist tests : Ok > > # > > > > Fixes: b04d2b919912 ("perf test: Fix test case perf evlist tests for s390x") > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter > > Tested-by: Jan Polensky > > Reviewed-by: Jan Polensky > > Cc: Ian Rogers > Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next, - Arnaldo