From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8819241C8C; Fri, 6 Feb 2026 21:19:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770412784; cv=none; b=AQvzyvkuSoDuFFV27vBAzSB7sTk0EleU2g2MrosNEY/9+Cz8uBUkmnY64moUCvFmxmM0H6yj1s4wsTx1hSQeI7G6KCea35MfpFr2uGyu44XSzDql5h6NoJD/uFlcW7QNk/0/MLqQge+I8XGRSWnZ7KG6h8r7ELHTp6fIVHH5cR0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770412784; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6NErU5KnnQRBqVCeVZLXZDnFZC/kLUPumlGUUXnaG3U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=butjIBIWM5dvYSUZ6WVCGLQ4IjAOTLjLSkXWAsvhjBESuZ6u7YQScC92Mya8vFPRTEx7jT5r0K5xb1toLPjL78Ukk2zZOh438I00eLhvYxi4EXv0Dl+7OMpDRoJ/FoX7gFjtckVMSfVlxe4F7enpAnQAV+Ir473soX9GrKgz+aw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=dTC/anuX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="dTC/anuX" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13C6CC116C6; Fri, 6 Feb 2026 21:19:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1770412784; bh=6NErU5KnnQRBqVCeVZLXZDnFZC/kLUPumlGUUXnaG3U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=dTC/anuXzaUKk1ctFNICm8RHA64RgL2m2Wd3XwYztEcrlm+ypXnh4VOgxtizqNlz6 udrMo2edlwVyqe5ZYDkIgE8YKzQJyB0hD+z4ASWmzy+8xBF8rnKK8nO0gd9Msvr217 MWVQnrbwm4t9EJlAsULEcEzMaFtQAhjqPdAU7zuJwVGiPZ6Nsguby8rw8O0ZHOcCZ3 P4M7Zn7GIrG6SAJp9cQ5gvguAjaU/ekr7s1Af1b75+Je76tkVvrpV0O301jJhc7dcL 4/SWzEAF1zUi9WvCzWfds0XgrU2ml2Z2G13eyHYNYFgpEE5rZ62lu9r7Wd+dBMJNo3 Y23jIACI7evrQ== Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 18:19:41 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> Cc: Ian Rogers , Namhyung Kim , James Clark , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , LKML , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Zecheng Li Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: Fix register usage in data type profiling Message-ID: References: <20260206012743.2617945-1-namhyung@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 10:08:55AM +0100, Dmitry Dolgov wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 09:00:43PM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote: > > It'd be nice to have a test on this to avoid a regression. Dmitrii's patch: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20260127083030.5909-1-9erthalion6@gmail.com/ > > does that for a Rust struct Buf, but it'd be nice to do something similar for C. > Agree, and I was planning to extend the tests in the patch above with a > C workload as well. Hey, did you test the patch? Having a Tested-by you in addition to the Reported-by would be nice. - Arnaldo