From: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>
To: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc, perf: Check that current->mm is alive before getting user callchain
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 21:59:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa71fOBjQwvCFFNq@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260309144045.169427-1-vmalik@redhat.com>
On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 03:40:45PM +0100, Viktor Malik wrote:
> It may happen that mm is already released, which leads to kernel panic.
> This adds the NULL check for current->mm, similarly to 20afc60f892d
> ("x86, perf: Check that current->mm is alive before getting user
> callchain").
>
> I was getting this panic when running a profiling BPF program
> (profile.py from bcc-tools):
>
> [26215.051935] Kernel attempted to read user page (588) - exploit attempt? (uid: 0)
> [26215.051950] BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference on read at 0x00000588
> [26215.051952] Faulting instruction address: 0xc00000000020fac0
> [26215.051957] Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
> [...]
> [26215.052049] Call Trace:
> [26215.052050] [c000000061da6d30] [c00000000020fc10] perf_callchain_user_64+0x2d0/0x490 (unreliable)
> [26215.052054] [c000000061da6dc0] [c00000000020f92c] perf_callchain_user+0x1c/0x30
> [26215.052057] [c000000061da6de0] [c0000000005ab2a0] get_perf_callchain+0x100/0x360
> [26215.052063] [c000000061da6e70] [c000000000573bc8] bpf_get_stackid+0x88/0xf0
> [26215.052067] [c000000061da6ea0] [c008000000042258] bpf_prog_16d4ab9ab662f669_do_perf_event+0xf8/0x274
> [...]
>
> In addition, move storing the top-level stack entry to generic
> perf_callchain_user to make sure the top-evel entry is always captured,
> even if current->mm is NULL.
>
> Fixes: 20002ded4d93 ("perf_counter: powerpc: Add callchain support")
> Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Move call to perf_callchain_store() for the top-level stack entry to
> common perf_callchain_user (Saket)
>
> arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c | 5 +++++
> arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_32.c | 1 -
> arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_64.c | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
> index 26aa26482c9a..992cc5c98214 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,11 @@ perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *re
> void
> perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> + perf_callchain_store(entry, perf_arch_instruction_pointer(regs));
> +
> + if (!current->mm)
> + return;
> +
> if (!is_32bit_task())
> perf_callchain_user_64(entry, regs);
> else
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_32.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_32.c
> index ddcc2d8aa64a..0de21c5d272c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_32.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_32.c
> @@ -142,7 +142,6 @@ void perf_callchain_user_32(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
> next_ip = perf_arch_instruction_pointer(regs);
> lr = regs->link;
> sp = regs->gpr[1];
> - perf_callchain_store(entry, next_ip);
>
> while (entry->nr < entry->max_stack) {
> fp = (unsigned int __user *) (unsigned long) sp;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_64.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_64.c
> index 115d1c105e8a..30fb61c5f0cb 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_64.c
> @@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ void perf_callchain_user_64(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
> next_ip = perf_arch_instruction_pointer(regs);
> lr = regs->link;
> sp = regs->gpr[1];
> - perf_callchain_store(entry, next_ip);
>
> while (entry->nr < entry->max_stack) {
> fp = (unsigned long __user *) sp;
> --
> 2.53.0
LGTM, feel free to add below tag:
Reviewed-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-09 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-09 14:40 [PATCH v2] powerpc, perf: Check that current->mm is alive before getting user callchain Viktor Malik
2026-03-09 16:29 ` Saket Kumar Bhaskar [this message]
2026-03-10 6:30 ` Venkat
2026-03-10 13:24 ` Qiao Zhao
2026-03-15 4:01 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aa71fOBjQwvCFFNq@linux.ibm.com \
--to=skb99@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
--cc=vmalik@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox