public inbox for linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] powerpc, perf: Check that current->mm is alive before getting user callchain
@ 2026-03-09 14:40 Viktor Malik
  2026-03-09 16:29 ` Saket Kumar Bhaskar
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Viktor Malik @ 2026-03-09 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linuxppc-dev
  Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan, Michael Ellerman, Nicholas Piggin,
	Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP), Viktor Malik, Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
	Paul Mackerras, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, bpf,
	Saket Kumar Bhaskar

It may happen that mm is already released, which leads to kernel panic.
This adds the NULL check for current->mm, similarly to 20afc60f892d
("x86, perf: Check that current->mm is alive before getting user
callchain").

I was getting this panic when running a profiling BPF program
(profile.py from bcc-tools):

    [26215.051935] Kernel attempted to read user page (588) - exploit attempt? (uid: 0)
    [26215.051950] BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference on read at 0x00000588
    [26215.051952] Faulting instruction address: 0xc00000000020fac0
    [26215.051957] Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
    [...]
    [26215.052049] Call Trace:
    [26215.052050] [c000000061da6d30] [c00000000020fc10] perf_callchain_user_64+0x2d0/0x490 (unreliable)
    [26215.052054] [c000000061da6dc0] [c00000000020f92c] perf_callchain_user+0x1c/0x30
    [26215.052057] [c000000061da6de0] [c0000000005ab2a0] get_perf_callchain+0x100/0x360
    [26215.052063] [c000000061da6e70] [c000000000573bc8] bpf_get_stackid+0x88/0xf0
    [26215.052067] [c000000061da6ea0] [c008000000042258] bpf_prog_16d4ab9ab662f669_do_perf_event+0xf8/0x274
    [...]

In addition, move storing the top-level stack entry to generic
perf_callchain_user to make sure the top-evel entry is always captured,
even if current->mm is NULL.

Fixes: 20002ded4d93 ("perf_counter: powerpc: Add callchain support")
Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Move call to perf_callchain_store() for the top-level stack entry to
  common perf_callchain_user (Saket)

 arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c    | 5 +++++
 arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_32.c | 1 -
 arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_64.c | 1 -
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
index 26aa26482c9a..992cc5c98214 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
@@ -103,6 +103,11 @@ perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *re
 void
 perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
+	perf_callchain_store(entry, perf_arch_instruction_pointer(regs));
+
+	if (!current->mm)
+		return;
+
 	if (!is_32bit_task())
 		perf_callchain_user_64(entry, regs);
 	else
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_32.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_32.c
index ddcc2d8aa64a..0de21c5d272c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_32.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_32.c
@@ -142,7 +142,6 @@ void perf_callchain_user_32(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
 	next_ip = perf_arch_instruction_pointer(regs);
 	lr = regs->link;
 	sp = regs->gpr[1];
-	perf_callchain_store(entry, next_ip);
 
 	while (entry->nr < entry->max_stack) {
 		fp = (unsigned int __user *) (unsigned long) sp;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_64.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_64.c
index 115d1c105e8a..30fb61c5f0cb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_64.c
@@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ void perf_callchain_user_64(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
 	next_ip = perf_arch_instruction_pointer(regs);
 	lr = regs->link;
 	sp = regs->gpr[1];
-	perf_callchain_store(entry, next_ip);
 
 	while (entry->nr < entry->max_stack) {
 		fp = (unsigned long __user *) sp;
-- 
2.53.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc, perf: Check that current->mm is alive before getting user callchain
  2026-03-09 14:40 [PATCH v2] powerpc, perf: Check that current->mm is alive before getting user callchain Viktor Malik
@ 2026-03-09 16:29 ` Saket Kumar Bhaskar
  2026-03-10  6:30   ` Venkat
  2026-03-10 13:24 ` Qiao Zhao
  2026-03-15  4:01 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Saket Kumar Bhaskar @ 2026-03-09 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Viktor Malik
  Cc: linuxppc-dev, Madhavan Srinivasan, Michael Ellerman,
	Nicholas Piggin, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP),
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, linux-perf-users,
	linux-kernel, bpf

On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 03:40:45PM +0100, Viktor Malik wrote:
> It may happen that mm is already released, which leads to kernel panic.
> This adds the NULL check for current->mm, similarly to 20afc60f892d
> ("x86, perf: Check that current->mm is alive before getting user
> callchain").
> 
> I was getting this panic when running a profiling BPF program
> (profile.py from bcc-tools):
> 
>     [26215.051935] Kernel attempted to read user page (588) - exploit attempt? (uid: 0)
>     [26215.051950] BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference on read at 0x00000588
>     [26215.051952] Faulting instruction address: 0xc00000000020fac0
>     [26215.051957] Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
>     [...]
>     [26215.052049] Call Trace:
>     [26215.052050] [c000000061da6d30] [c00000000020fc10] perf_callchain_user_64+0x2d0/0x490 (unreliable)
>     [26215.052054] [c000000061da6dc0] [c00000000020f92c] perf_callchain_user+0x1c/0x30
>     [26215.052057] [c000000061da6de0] [c0000000005ab2a0] get_perf_callchain+0x100/0x360
>     [26215.052063] [c000000061da6e70] [c000000000573bc8] bpf_get_stackid+0x88/0xf0
>     [26215.052067] [c000000061da6ea0] [c008000000042258] bpf_prog_16d4ab9ab662f669_do_perf_event+0xf8/0x274
>     [...]
> 
> In addition, move storing the top-level stack entry to generic
> perf_callchain_user to make sure the top-evel entry is always captured,
> even if current->mm is NULL.
> 
> Fixes: 20002ded4d93 ("perf_counter: powerpc: Add callchain support")
> Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Move call to perf_callchain_store() for the top-level stack entry to
>   common perf_callchain_user (Saket)
> 
>  arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c    | 5 +++++
>  arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_32.c | 1 -
>  arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_64.c | 1 -
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
> index 26aa26482c9a..992cc5c98214 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,11 @@ perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *re
>  void
>  perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> +	perf_callchain_store(entry, perf_arch_instruction_pointer(regs));
> +
> +	if (!current->mm)
> +		return;
> +
>  	if (!is_32bit_task())
>  		perf_callchain_user_64(entry, regs);
>  	else
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_32.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_32.c
> index ddcc2d8aa64a..0de21c5d272c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_32.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_32.c
> @@ -142,7 +142,6 @@ void perf_callchain_user_32(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
>  	next_ip = perf_arch_instruction_pointer(regs);
>  	lr = regs->link;
>  	sp = regs->gpr[1];
> -	perf_callchain_store(entry, next_ip);
>  
>  	while (entry->nr < entry->max_stack) {
>  		fp = (unsigned int __user *) (unsigned long) sp;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_64.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_64.c
> index 115d1c105e8a..30fb61c5f0cb 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_64.c
> @@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ void perf_callchain_user_64(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
>  	next_ip = perf_arch_instruction_pointer(regs);
>  	lr = regs->link;
>  	sp = regs->gpr[1];
> -	perf_callchain_store(entry, next_ip);
>  
>  	while (entry->nr < entry->max_stack) {
>  		fp = (unsigned long __user *) sp;
> -- 
> 2.53.0
LGTM, feel free to add below tag:
Reviewed-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc, perf: Check that current->mm is alive before getting user callchain
  2026-03-09 16:29 ` Saket Kumar Bhaskar
@ 2026-03-10  6:30   ` Venkat
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Venkat @ 2026-03-10  6:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Saket Kumar Bhaskar, Viktor Malik
  Cc: Viktor Malik, linuxppc-dev, Madhavan Srinivasan, Michael Ellerman,
	Nicholas Piggin, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP),
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, linux-perf-users,
	linux-kernel, bpf



> On 9 Mar 2026, at 9:59 PM, Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 03:40:45PM +0100, Viktor Malik wrote:
>> It may happen that mm is already released, which leads to kernel panic.
>> This adds the NULL check for current->mm, similarly to 20afc60f892d
>> ("x86, perf: Check that current->mm is alive before getting user
>> callchain").
>> 
>> I was getting this panic when running a profiling BPF program
>> (profile.py from bcc-tools):
>> 
>>    [26215.051935] Kernel attempted to read user page (588) - exploit attempt? (uid: 0)
>>    [26215.051950] BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference on read at 0x00000588
>>    [26215.051952] Faulting instruction address: 0xc00000000020fac0
>>    [26215.051957] Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
>>    [...]
>>    [26215.052049] Call Trace:
>>    [26215.052050] [c000000061da6d30] [c00000000020fc10] perf_callchain_user_64+0x2d0/0x490 (unreliable)
>>    [26215.052054] [c000000061da6dc0] [c00000000020f92c] perf_callchain_user+0x1c/0x30
>>    [26215.052057] [c000000061da6de0] [c0000000005ab2a0] get_perf_callchain+0x100/0x360
>>    [26215.052063] [c000000061da6e70] [c000000000573bc8] bpf_get_stackid+0x88/0xf0
>>    [26215.052067] [c000000061da6ea0] [c008000000042258] bpf_prog_16d4ab9ab662f669_do_perf_event+0xf8/0x274
>>    [...]
>> 
>> In addition, move storing the top-level stack entry to generic
>> perf_callchain_user to make sure the top-evel entry is always captured,
>> even if current->mm is NULL.
>> 
>> Fixes: 20002ded4d93 ("perf_counter: powerpc: Add callchain support")
>> Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>
>> ---

Tested-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>

This patch fixes, reported issue.

Regards,
Venkat.
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Move call to perf_callchain_store() for the top-level stack entry to
>>  common perf_callchain_user (Saket)
>> 
>> arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c    | 5 +++++
>> arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_32.c | 1 -
>> arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_64.c | 1 -
>> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
>> index 26aa26482c9a..992cc5c98214 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
>> @@ -103,6 +103,11 @@ perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *re
>> void
>> perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *regs)
>> {
>> + perf_callchain_store(entry, perf_arch_instruction_pointer(regs));
>> +
>> + if (!current->mm)
>> + return;
>> +
>> if (!is_32bit_task())
>> perf_callchain_user_64(entry, regs);
>> else
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_32.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_32.c
>> index ddcc2d8aa64a..0de21c5d272c 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_32.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_32.c
>> @@ -142,7 +142,6 @@ void perf_callchain_user_32(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
>> next_ip = perf_arch_instruction_pointer(regs);
>> lr = regs->link;
>> sp = regs->gpr[1];
>> - perf_callchain_store(entry, next_ip);
>> 
>> while (entry->nr < entry->max_stack) {
>> fp = (unsigned int __user *) (unsigned long) sp;
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_64.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_64.c
>> index 115d1c105e8a..30fb61c5f0cb 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_64.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_64.c
>> @@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ void perf_callchain_user_64(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
>> next_ip = perf_arch_instruction_pointer(regs);
>> lr = regs->link;
>> sp = regs->gpr[1];
>> - perf_callchain_store(entry, next_ip);
>> 
>> while (entry->nr < entry->max_stack) {
>> fp = (unsigned long __user *) sp;
>> -- 
>> 2.53.0
> LGTM, feel free to add below tag:
> Reviewed-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>
>> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc, perf: Check that current->mm is alive before getting user callchain
  2026-03-09 14:40 [PATCH v2] powerpc, perf: Check that current->mm is alive before getting user callchain Viktor Malik
  2026-03-09 16:29 ` Saket Kumar Bhaskar
@ 2026-03-10 13:24 ` Qiao Zhao
  2026-03-15  4:01 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Qiao Zhao @ 2026-03-10 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Viktor Malik
  Cc: linuxppc-dev, Madhavan Srinivasan, Michael Ellerman,
	Nicholas Piggin, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP),
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, linux-perf-users,
	linux-kernel, bpf, Saket Kumar Bhaskar

Run the BPF profiling program (profile.py from bcc-tools) on a ppc64le
machine and passed.

Tested-by: Qiao Zhao <qzhao@redhat.com>

Thanks,
Qiao

On Mon, Mar 9, 2026 at 10:43 PM Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> It may happen that mm is already released, which leads to kernel panic.
> This adds the NULL check for current->mm, similarly to 20afc60f892d
> ("x86, perf: Check that current->mm is alive before getting user
> callchain").
>
> I was getting this panic when running a profiling BPF program
> (profile.py from bcc-tools):
>
>     [26215.051935] Kernel attempted to read user page (588) - exploit attempt? (uid: 0)
>     [26215.051950] BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference on read at 0x00000588
>     [26215.051952] Faulting instruction address: 0xc00000000020fac0
>     [26215.051957] Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
>     [...]
>     [26215.052049] Call Trace:
>     [26215.052050] [c000000061da6d30] [c00000000020fc10] perf_callchain_user_64+0x2d0/0x490 (unreliable)
>     [26215.052054] [c000000061da6dc0] [c00000000020f92c] perf_callchain_user+0x1c/0x30
>     [26215.052057] [c000000061da6de0] [c0000000005ab2a0] get_perf_callchain+0x100/0x360
>     [26215.052063] [c000000061da6e70] [c000000000573bc8] bpf_get_stackid+0x88/0xf0
>     [26215.052067] [c000000061da6ea0] [c008000000042258] bpf_prog_16d4ab9ab662f669_do_perf_event+0xf8/0x274
>     [...]
>
> In addition, move storing the top-level stack entry to generic
> perf_callchain_user to make sure the top-evel entry is always captured,
> even if current->mm is NULL.
>
> Fixes: 20002ded4d93 ("perf_counter: powerpc: Add callchain support")
> Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Move call to perf_callchain_store() for the top-level stack entry to
>   common perf_callchain_user (Saket)
>
>  arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c    | 5 +++++
>  arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_32.c | 1 -
>  arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_64.c | 1 -
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
> index 26aa26482c9a..992cc5c98214 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,11 @@ perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *re
>  void
>  perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> +       perf_callchain_store(entry, perf_arch_instruction_pointer(regs));
> +
> +       if (!current->mm)
> +               return;
> +
>         if (!is_32bit_task())
>                 perf_callchain_user_64(entry, regs);
>         else
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_32.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_32.c
> index ddcc2d8aa64a..0de21c5d272c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_32.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_32.c
> @@ -142,7 +142,6 @@ void perf_callchain_user_32(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
>         next_ip = perf_arch_instruction_pointer(regs);
>         lr = regs->link;
>         sp = regs->gpr[1];
> -       perf_callchain_store(entry, next_ip);
>
>         while (entry->nr < entry->max_stack) {
>                 fp = (unsigned int __user *) (unsigned long) sp;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_64.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_64.c
> index 115d1c105e8a..30fb61c5f0cb 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_64.c
> @@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ void perf_callchain_user_64(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
>         next_ip = perf_arch_instruction_pointer(regs);
>         lr = regs->link;
>         sp = regs->gpr[1];
> -       perf_callchain_store(entry, next_ip);
>
>         while (entry->nr < entry->max_stack) {
>                 fp = (unsigned long __user *) sp;
> --
> 2.53.0
>
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc, perf: Check that current->mm is alive before getting user callchain
  2026-03-09 14:40 [PATCH v2] powerpc, perf: Check that current->mm is alive before getting user callchain Viktor Malik
  2026-03-09 16:29 ` Saket Kumar Bhaskar
  2026-03-10 13:24 ` Qiao Zhao
@ 2026-03-15  4:01 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Madhavan Srinivasan @ 2026-03-15  4:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linuxppc-dev, Viktor Malik
  Cc: Michael Ellerman, Nicholas Piggin, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP),
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, linux-perf-users,
	linux-kernel, bpf, Saket Kumar Bhaskar

On Mon, 09 Mar 2026 15:40:45 +0100, Viktor Malik wrote:
> It may happen that mm is already released, which leads to kernel panic.
> This adds the NULL check for current->mm, similarly to 20afc60f892d
> ("x86, perf: Check that current->mm is alive before getting user
> callchain").
> 
> I was getting this panic when running a profiling BPF program
> (profile.py from bcc-tools):
> 
> [...]

Applied to powerpc/fixes.

[1/1] powerpc, perf: Check that current->mm is alive before getting user callchain
      https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/e9bbfb4bfa86c6b5515b868d6982ac60505d7e39

cheers

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-15  4:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-09 14:40 [PATCH v2] powerpc, perf: Check that current->mm is alive before getting user callchain Viktor Malik
2026-03-09 16:29 ` Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-03-10  6:30   ` Venkat
2026-03-10 13:24 ` Qiao Zhao
2026-03-15  4:01 ` Madhavan Srinivasan

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox