From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>,
"linux-perf-use." <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Jan Polensky <japo@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: perf stat issue with 7.0.0rc3
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 14:10:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abR9L2t6cwhWgtC7@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fWBDMMPv_CSE4Yv5VC_+MhXF2ddjrePeR=EajyBfQjS2g@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 11:27:30AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > >No worries, presumably if I'd been monitoring:
> > >https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools.git/log/?h=tmp.perf-tools
> > >I'd have seen it was missing. Perhaps you can give a heads up to check
> > >for missing patches when assembling the PRs. I rarely look at
> > >perf-tools.git as perf-tools-next.git is where all the action is :-)
> > >Actually, I vibe coded a script that may work to automate this:
> > >```
> >
> >
> > Well, if those patches are ok for perf-tools, i.e. are fixes for bugs introduced in the current merge window or urgent fixes for longstanding bugs, they shouldn't be in perf-tools-next, they should be in perf-tools to be merger in the current merge window.
> >
> > Coordination in triaging via an Acked-by/Reviewed-by pointing out it's something for the current merge window, something I do, is what we should strive to do.
> >
> > When I notice something that's needed for the current window that's been processed by Namhyung for perf-tools-next, I merge it as well (as will be in this case and maybe in the others that you pointed out, thanks, I'll check each one).
> >
> > No problem with that, better be in both branches than to get missed :-)
>
> Thanks! In the patches tagged as "fixes," I think these 2 also need picking up:
>
> commit aa6a6a2d16c1e2e27e986936369959d70316199f ("perf parse-events:
> Fix big-endian 'overwrite' by writing") to fix s390.
> commit 06ec44c2aa2ef15fd56f9808b6cf7495e1fbd8ec ("perf kvm stat: Fix
> relative paths for including headers") for non-x86 builds.
>
> The other patches are test fixes or address malloc failures that
> shouldn't really happen, so they are not a priority.
Great! Thanks for taking care of this. I'll be more careful when
merging fixes.
Thanks,
Namhyung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-13 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-13 13:13 perf stat issue with 7.0.0rc3 Thomas Richter
2026-03-13 15:13 ` Leo Yan
2026-03-13 15:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-03-13 15:41 ` Ian Rogers
2026-03-13 15:56 ` Arnaldo Melo
2026-03-13 16:10 ` Ian Rogers
2026-03-13 17:01 ` Arnaldo Melo
2026-03-13 18:27 ` Ian Rogers
2026-03-13 21:10 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2026-03-17 20:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-03-17 19:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-03-17 19:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-03-17 20:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-03-17 20:50 ` Ian Rogers
2026-03-18 0:37 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-03-18 2:25 ` Ian Rogers
2026-03-19 1:01 ` [PATCH v1] perf metrics: Make common stalled metrics conditional on having the event Ian Rogers
2026-03-24 4:19 ` perf stat issue with 7.0.0rc3 Ian Rogers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abR9L2t6cwhWgtC7@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=japo@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox