From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C85F333F593 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2026 23:48:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775087295; cv=none; b=cRm7vZuRSlLDl/uS7QMb2d42ihFX5HIj4vV5b/1FYWZF0psDvBvRsLozFL2nM6GASeEQovBNq7JpKExns+JNz1XBwCYL362/hYsSLQHnIFySKvn80959VFiLQ4KrmJ7EiVOCBNXbi7Inu4rxLyzymVKdH3Ey9fbCYXtKam6IN3k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775087295; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NGZttMNJ9EWXO/Q81Wa5rkHXP+XklwmmmSU7SV71jlw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Y7Q5BVzHDKFP0oQ/DEHjvC93yoEjVETmZCr//DbCKYOUq9PcXV8iRpCFFqdwe3dQW7bMad8BLRLEZ1iOiIeZGQvVkZD1wm3fL54d7ywQ1/QBrXb8Cr53Zk6QXHKUt5wCeUNrScfcoUDgkHErNcqqphQ4DL+r8ItmCbQhccNeZ9c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=K6mfWRRo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="K6mfWRRo" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B39E2C116C6; Wed, 1 Apr 2026 23:48:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1775087295; bh=NGZttMNJ9EWXO/Q81Wa5rkHXP+XklwmmmSU7SV71jlw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=K6mfWRRo+anvEdrq+IIbqrL6UiwyXlPhr70lg2ciUAhs0P+tjbMRbVvay0NF4jRna zGlIFHaNhu+drsEi5vynwiCHjwad0DebcTunXFG+hzgSigh6GQ8/Hl6oyn8tHP7JsF 4f9urXtA3wiSxQrm1RCr3YOXZ/1vz7361cq49AN1ymCJoEzPgJuw3Y8oupQWPIa7hd vwrn1Uid5A9vf3rBpe7nA9zZo8bMAGPUJaCVplrVpPd8Gel2j7NvbQaueXbGs6yZt7 4t3Fhq8FaH4kGY1vKwIE+C4CEgnkxMCc3pCXfIjQ/7IsesA+qFJfiogJSNhiagpHmV wJnkW6xGMBqjA== Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 16:48:13 -0700 From: Namhyung Kim To: Ian Rogers Cc: Venkat , Athira Rajeev , Thomas Falcon , acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com, vmolnaro@redhat.com, mpetlan@redhat.com, tmricht@linux.ibm.com, maddy@linux.ibm.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Tejas.Manhas1@ibm.com, Tanushree.Shah@ibm.com, Shivani.Nittor@ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/perf/test: Check for perf stat return code in perf all PMU test Message-ID: References: <20260315105751.86835-1-atrajeev@linux.ibm.com> <7B7E5C6C-D15A-4B79-925B-B5F3EDD84774@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 01:40:47PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > This looks like a latent Intel cpu_atom PMU bug. Thomas, wdyt? Are you ok with the change itself then? I'm not sure what's the expectation when the test runs with a regular user. I assume the intention of this change is running as root.. Thanks, Namhyung