public inbox for linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>,
	Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf metricgroup: Avoid scanning unnecessary PMUs for identifier match
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 23:30:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <actqG7NHUWR8x7x_@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dcf5a92b-ef14-43d5-9f21-568252fd630b@linaro.org>

On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 03:44:21PM +0100, James Clark wrote:
> 
> 
> On 26/03/2026 10:44 pm, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > Only uncore PMUs can have an identifier, so add an optimized
> > perf_pmus__scan routine for that case to avoid all PMU types being
> > created.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
> 
> > ---
> >   tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c |  8 ++------
> >   tools/perf/util/pmus.c        | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> >   tools/perf/util/pmus.h        |  1 +
> >   3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
> > index 7e39d469111b..769b38400832 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
> > @@ -410,13 +410,9 @@ static int metricgroup__sys_event_iter(const struct pmu_metric *pm,
> >   	if (!pm->metric_expr || !pm->compat)
> >   		return 0;
> > -	while ((pmu = perf_pmus__scan(pmu))) {
> > -
> > -		if (!pmu->id || !pmu_uncore_identifier_match(pm->compat, pmu->id))
> > -			continue;
> > -
> > +	while ((pmu = perf_pmus__scan_for_uncore_id(pmu, pm->compat)))
> >   		return d->fn(pm, table, d->data);

Sashiko review: it's natural to convert it to 'if'.

Thanks,
Namhyung


> > -	}
> > +
> >   	return 0;
> >   }
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmus.c b/tools/perf/util/pmus.c
> > index 98be2eb8f1f0..9859d7056fb7 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/pmus.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmus.c
> > @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__scan_matching_wildcard(struct perf_pmu *pmu, const c
> >   	if (!pmu) {
> >   		/*
> >   		 * Core PMUs, other sysfs PMUs and tool PMU can have any name or
> > -		 * aren't wother optimizing for.
> > +		 * aren't worth optimizing for.
> >   		 */
> >   		unsigned int to_read_pmus =  PERF_TOOL_PMU_TYPE_PE_CORE_MASK |
> >   			PERF_TOOL_PMU_TYPE_PE_OTHER_MASK |
> > @@ -486,6 +486,22 @@ static struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__scan_skip_duplicates(struct perf_pmu *pmu)
> >   	return NULL;
> >   }
> > +struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__scan_for_uncore_id(struct perf_pmu *pmu, const char *compat)
> > +{
> > +	if (!pmu) {
> > +		/* Only uncore PMUs can have identifiers. */
> > +		unsigned int to_read_pmus = PERF_TOOL_PMU_TYPE_PE_OTHER_MASK;
> > +
> > +		pmu_read_sysfs(to_read_pmus);
> > +		pmu = list_prepare_entry(pmu, &other_pmus, list);
> > +	}
> > +	list_for_each_entry_continue(pmu, &other_pmus, list) {
> > +		if (pmu->id && pmu_uncore_identifier_match(compat, pmu->id))
> > +			return pmu;
> > +	}
> > +	return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> >   const struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__pmu_for_pmu_filter(const char *str)
> >   {
> >   	struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmus.h b/tools/perf/util/pmus.h
> > index 7cb36863711a..0d55edb3f2fc 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/pmus.h
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmus.h
> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__scan(struct perf_pmu *pmu);
> >   struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__scan_core(struct perf_pmu *pmu);
> >   struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__scan_for_event(struct perf_pmu *pmu, const char *event);
> >   struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__scan_matching_wildcard(struct perf_pmu *pmu, const char *wildcard);
> > +struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__scan_for_uncore_id(struct perf_pmu *pmu, const char *compat);
> >   const struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__pmu_for_pmu_filter(const char *str);
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-31  6:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-26 22:44 [PATCH v1] perf metricgroup: Avoid scanning unnecessary PMUs for identifier match Ian Rogers
2026-03-30 14:44 ` James Clark
2026-03-31  6:30   ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2026-03-31 14:05     ` Ian Rogers
2026-04-01  3:51       ` Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=actqG7NHUWR8x7x_@google.com \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox