Re: [perf-tools-next:tmp.perf-tools-next 9/10] grep: tools/include/uapi/linux/fadvise.h: No such file or directory

Re: [perf-tools-next:tmp.perf-tools-next 9/10] grep: tools/include/uapi/linux/fadvise.h: No such file or directory

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 08:00:01PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git tmp.perf-tools-next
> head:   02288074fcf09dec98dcb3fefdada4ebb4a91d33
> commit: 7eb9876f1d9fdb6f6a8ed5737452178ca2169205 [9/10] perf beauty: Move copy of fadvise.h from tools/include/ to tools/perf/trace/beauty/include/
> config: arm64-allnoconfig-bpf (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260331/202603311011.IoMYrQLJ-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260331/202603311011.IoMYrQLJ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202603311011.IoMYrQLJ-lkp@intel.com/

Since this hasn't touched a non-tmp branch, I'll not add it, i.e. its a
v2.

Thanks anyway, I found and fixed the issue,

- Arnaldo
 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    Makefile.config:576: No elfutils/debuginfod.h found, no debuginfo server support, please install libdebuginfod-dev/elfutils-debuginfod-client-devel or equivalent
>    Makefile.config:963: No libllvm 13+ found, slower source file resolution, please install llvm-devel/llvm-dev
>    Makefile.config:1159: Rust is not found. Test workloads with rust are disabled.
> >> grep: tools/include/uapi/linux/fadvise.h: No such file or directory
>      PERF_VERSION = 7.0.rc4.g7eb9876f1d9f
> 
> -- 
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

Re: [perf-tools-next:tmp.perf-tools-next 9/10] grep: tools/include/uapi/linux/fadvise.h: No such file or directory

[Namhyung Kim]

Hi Arnaldo,

On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 04:15:54PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 08:00:01PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git tmp.perf-tools-next
> > head:   02288074fcf09dec98dcb3fefdada4ebb4a91d33
> > commit: 7eb9876f1d9fdb6f6a8ed5737452178ca2169205 [9/10] perf beauty: Move copy of fadvise.h from tools/include/ to tools/perf/trace/beauty/include/
> > config: arm64-allnoconfig-bpf (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260331/202603311011.IoMYrQLJ-lkp@intel.com/config)
> > compiler: aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
> > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260331/202603311011.IoMYrQLJ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> > 
> > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202603311011.IoMYrQLJ-lkp@intel.com/
> 
> Since this hasn't touched a non-tmp branch, I'll not add it, i.e. its a
> v2.
> 
> Thanks anyway, I found and fixed the issue,

Do you want to add it to perf-tools or send v2?  I thought you wanted to
have it in perf-tools-next as you added "next" in the patch subject.

Thanks,
Namhyung

Re: [perf-tools-next:tmp.perf-tools-next 9/10] grep: tools/include/uapi/linux/fadvise.h: No such file or directory

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 01:25:04PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Arnaldo,
> 
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 04:15:54PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 08:00:01PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git tmp.perf-tools-next
> > > head:   02288074fcf09dec98dcb3fefdada4ebb4a91d33
> > > commit: 7eb9876f1d9fdb6f6a8ed5737452178ca2169205 [9/10] perf beauty: Move copy of fadvise.h from tools/include/ to tools/perf/trace/beauty/include/
> > > config: arm64-allnoconfig-bpf (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260331/202603311011.IoMYrQLJ-lkp@intel.com/config)
> > > compiler: aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
> > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260331/202603311011.IoMYrQLJ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> > > 
> > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> > > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202603311011.IoMYrQLJ-lkp@intel.com/
> > 
> > Since this hasn't touched a non-tmp branch, I'll not add it, i.e. its a
> > v2.
> > 
> > Thanks anyway, I found and fixed the issue,
> 
> Do you want to add it to perf-tools or send v2?  I thought you wanted to
> have it in perf-tools-next as you added "next" in the patch subject.

v2, yeah, for next.

Will send now, together with the other related patch, so that sashiko
can test the series and not fail to test the the fadvise one, that
depends on the first.

- Arnaldo

Re: [perf-tools-next:tmp.perf-tools-next 9/10] grep: tools/include/uapi/linux/fadvise.h: No such file or directory

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 05:48:28PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 01:25:04PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Hi Arnaldo,
> > 
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 04:15:54PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 08:00:01PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git tmp.perf-tools-next
> > > > head:   02288074fcf09dec98dcb3fefdada4ebb4a91d33
> > > > commit: 7eb9876f1d9fdb6f6a8ed5737452178ca2169205 [9/10] perf beauty: Move copy of fadvise.h from tools/include/ to tools/perf/trace/beauty/include/
> > > > config: arm64-allnoconfig-bpf (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260331/202603311011.IoMYrQLJ-lkp@intel.com/config)
> > > > compiler: aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
> > > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260331/202603311011.IoMYrQLJ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> > > > 
> > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> > > > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > > > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202603311011.IoMYrQLJ-lkp@intel.com/
> > > 
> > > Since this hasn't touched a non-tmp branch, I'll not add it, i.e. its a
> > > v2.
> > > 
> > > Thanks anyway, I found and fixed the issue,
> > 
> > Do you want to add it to perf-tools or send v2?  I thought you wanted to
> > have it in perf-tools-next as you added "next" in the patch subject.
> 
> v2, yeah, for next.
> 
> Will send now, together with the other related patch, so that sashiko
> can test the series and not fail to test the the fadvise one, that
> depends on the first.

Got your point, it is in perf-tools-next/tmp.perf-tools-next already, so
you'll need to replace what is there with what I'll send as v2, since it
didn't hit perf-tools-next/perf-tools-next.

Ok, sending it now.

- Arnaldo