From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org,
irogers@google.com, james.clark@linaro.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
adrian.hunter@intel.com, ravi.bangoria@amd.com,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] perf: Fix SIGCHLD vs pause() race with short-lived workloads
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 16:58:17 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ag4SWXqjAWsjuCsE@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260520102017.293419-1-swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>
On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 10:20:14AM +0000, Swapnil Sapkal wrote:
> Several perf subcommands (sched stats, lock contention) use the pattern
> of forking a workload child, calling evlist__start_workload() to uncork
> it, and then calling pause() to wait for a signal (typically SIGCHLD
> when the child exits, or SIGINT/SIGTERM from the user).
>
> This pattern has a race condition: if the workload is very short-lived,
> the child can exit and deliver SIGCHLD in the window between
> evlist__start_workload() and pause(). Since pause() only returns when a
> signal is received *while the process is suspended*, and SIGCHLD has
> already been delivered and handled by the empty sighandler(), pause()
> blocks indefinitely.
>
> The fix replaces pause() with a simpler approach:
>
> - The signal handler now sets a 'volatile sig_atomic_t done' flag
> to record delivery. The flag is reset before handler registration
> so that a signal arriving during the setup phase is not discarded.
>
> - Replace pause() with a unified loop:
>
> while (!done) {
> if (argc && waitpid(evlist->workload.pid, NULL, WNOHANG) > 0)
> break;
> sleep(1);
> }
>
> This handles both workload mode (child exit detected via waitpid)
> and system-wide mode (user sends SIGINT/SIGTERM setting done).
> Using WNOHANG avoids the SA_RESTART problem where a blocking
> waitpid() would auto-restart and ignore the done flag if the child
> doesn't exit on signal.
>
> Three call sites are affected across two files:
> - perf_sched__schedstat_record() in builtin-sched.c
> - perf_sched__schedstat_live() in builtin-sched.c
> - __cmd_contention() in builtin-lock.c
>
> The two pause() sites in builtin-kwork.c are NOT affected because they
> do not register SIGCHLD or fork workload children; they only wait for
> user-initiated SIGINT/SIGTERM.
Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next, for v7.2.
- Arnaldo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-20 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-20 10:20 [PATCH v4 0/3] perf: Fix SIGCHLD vs pause() race with short-lived workloads Swapnil Sapkal
2026-05-20 10:20 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] perf sched stats: Fix SIGCHLD vs pause() race in schedstat_record() Swapnil Sapkal
2026-05-20 10:20 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] perf sched stats: Fix SIGCHLD vs pause() race in schedstat_live() Swapnil Sapkal
2026-05-20 11:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-20 10:20 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] perf lock contention: Fix SIGCHLD vs pause() race in __cmd_contention() Swapnil Sapkal
2026-05-20 19:58 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ag4SWXqjAWsjuCsE@x1 \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox