From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7A4036A35F; Wed, 20 May 2026 20:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779308887; cv=none; b=eIs+XS46g9Wv7DOriKZp+hvNh9Fvi/mA7O1qjqAxMcNxV1f7FoYN7Wa/aDqC/HuzhGHZ6d0Y4W5/575fipReZgyRjpezjw9B2Vhikxqf0FtFUJ/CLr/EGfe64tb54b4tl3EqA0JMQxa8guBmsKghvp8/kLeQl8LH28CWI64lCBo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779308887; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eMI9IWXEfQQ7GV6t/Psl9Uwh7YK6vo+ks6EYFJ1MbCg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=E09Nw+uk7XxpAVxR5QbBzEjAAd+CWtWV4OVSczDASDLLQ7nHB8UM49LcLinTI3B/KPtcrEIwJHihN7TUHUg5rDetUARK/f9gsJRoGEYnFB1FG02sM1enowP2DCXwJ1lGD8Cj2ccio6b53IErMZ/w/BTOqOPz2RCjLU+ZIfQlWhg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=bYMi/seK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="bYMi/seK" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50CA91F00A3A; Wed, 20 May 2026 20:28:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779308886; bh=MEORKWFCTffhnnk334C+E8UsQuSBrEHXKXve7+xW+Y0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=bYMi/seK5NeLodb52PVr/GXLtaN8YXL6Ai5vPY4l504ZJWcnjdZMJLQE001u/qfPJ 6yqKp2pRyiP87oXRaGN4FXZWqWJ8HnCakPLvUQTE8PsgB3p1eVuo2D+unYse/krsfO WwOi+J43meFHqPF0zeH7t8HWRBx9EdVKetX3Qi7NpyKRB2D41HdKs1bN1++CRV6YiV gwv9dV6oi7W56kRpYZMoQNwtscT/Cq8oTMKQTOPwLFGKvZ3wGn3a9GTyE355zTf5pB YqBiqMUcQWl83zDdBzeohLDG337i5URRx9TNsdtZILLz03C5NMKgXpSn7oApfGUrSk SNxjiVAOotDHQ== Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 13:28:02 -0700 From: Namhyung Kim To: Ian Rogers Cc: acme@kernel.org, 9erthalion6@gmail.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, collin.funk1@gmail.com, german.gomez@arm.com, james.clark@linaro.org, jolsa@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, zide.chen@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/2] perf tests: Add uncore and x86 topdown event sorting tests Message-ID: References: <20260518043140.2522141-1-irogers@google.com> <20260518062904.2591616-1-irogers@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 08:31:31AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2026 at 11:29 PM Ian Rogers wrote: > > > > A patch thread changing event sorting highlighted a lack of testing > > for the more complicated uncore and x86 perf metric event sorting: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/CAP-5=fWRgDo7UnJAD4C--d=mVPRhOEWZVyU7nVM1YEp3jncAgg@mail.gmail.com/ > > Purely test changes with green analysis from Sashiko: > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260518062904.2591616-1-irogers%40google.com > It would be nice to get help landing this. On my AMD machine, it looks good now. $ sudo tools/perf/perf test -v sorting 6: Uncore event sorting : Ok 76.2: topdown sorting : Ok Tested-by: Namhyung Kim Thanks, Namhyung