From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C5953BED66; Thu, 21 May 2026 13:03:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779368609; cv=none; b=Sx0dbvuo+EaxFJNzYYQF2H8cNeyE/zg0kc8YuPBj7NvG6xRy3WP1rNC9v5SLgVKgiAlRI7Wjbt4t+v0LKXDeqvxMTlqCT8FHcdNR0lt8WDblKYBi+TFc9C6TEUS7KX/lTKxZdacDE32fsN7jfksmF6mng4hroXPzCLV/votjifQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779368609; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LQJGKjpaUpkFsitH7BlBeCDFh+DO/nMNCRCX5lOHcl8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=skoU52vacrrWvaArk5hwfHU/UWA+q6hMExEiePIxXQFZffktKpssVY4QO9u+3QWdb4AVw6Dx5bR5H/tCojmiWsGjJ6t7EoEJ/tvEjHAsHgTNSPJi3SIoKBNUm7oNRpnGgZNeLXyHcf23ojavv/5Tyu2CxolIG9HULNrimup9Xo0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=L4wDesyF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="L4wDesyF" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 36EA51F00A3C; Thu, 21 May 2026 13:03:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779368608; bh=/lytDsxCjcesE5K/6KnlhJAWrzcFLtKMBrhhaD5NM54=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=L4wDesyF+hqN+U2lprF58+HV4uFVrIOfqIzRn/0ylrW10Ri6FIYT/gnCX5HnfX1Jw eRqNh1FaNA0PqPQ7NE5hd3RfInSFC9PxYW6aExiolPd8FcoeKY1RoCIxkAWofljAUm D2ymj6+i54TTLruHJzNNJ1Unhv5kkOYCqoa8He8Yqdx8pmQnRi+U3j0AcqJRzPRzQr Urk0pDabne1JE6vy/m1S2YlE/MBslMe3HWbCG8YL9807hZio306s9YzK124gqPm4+E p6L/Kb5PEhKCzTJop0XMBOQt2+kyD7IgruN5DCUjsN3Cbh5li+uOwWbAvsTgUeWSie kY7G7rkPRjeYQ== Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 10:03:25 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ian Rogers Cc: namhyung@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com, ak@linux.intel.com, alex@ghiti.fr, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, anup@brainfault.org, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, atrajeev@linux.ibm.com, blakejones@google.com, ctshao@google.com, dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, derek.foreman@collabora.com, dvyukov@google.com, howardchu95@gmail.com, hrishikesh123s@gmail.com, james.clark@linaro.org, jolsa@kernel.org, krzysztof.m.lopatowski@gmail.com, leo.yan@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux@treblig.org, mingo@redhat.com, nichen@iscas.ac.cn, palmer@dabbelt.com, peterz@infradead.org, pjw@kernel.org, ravi.bangoria@amd.com, swapnil.sapkal@amd.com, tanze@kylinos.cn, thomas.falcon@intel.com, tianyou.li@intel.com, yujie.liu@intel.com, zhouquan@iscas.ac.cn Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 00/32] perf tools: Add evsel to perf_sample Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 03:32:18PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 2:51 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > wrote: > > > > > > Everything is at > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git tmp.perf-tools-next > > > > I also rebased my perf.data validation (that has some extra fixes, because... Sashiko): > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git perf-data-validation > > > > I think I addressed some of your review comments, if bored, take a look, > > I'll submit as soon as I get what is in tmp.perf-tools-next moved to > > perf-tools-next which I plan/hope to do later today, after the container > > build tests finish. > > I'll look at the perf-data-validation branch. Would it be okay to post > the patches to LKML so that we can get the Sashiko review on them? I did it, and having passed thru sashiko locally dozens of times it ended up being rather clean :-) I'm addressing some of the valid concerns raised now and will send a v2. - Arnaldo