From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] perf bench: add --write-size option to sched pipe
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 16:34:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aiC6DA3o4L7mx0S7@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260603-perf_bench_pipe-v4-1-f48c0ba6d6cb@debian.org>
On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 03:35:07AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> The default ping-pong uses sizeof(int) (4 bytes) per iteration, which
> exercises only the pipe-buffer merge path and keeps allocation entirely
> out of the picture. That makes the bench a useful scheduler / context-
> switch latency probe but unable to surface anything from the pipe
> page-allocation hot path.
>
> Add a -s/--write-size option that sets the bytes written and read per
> ping-pong iteration. The buffer is allocated for each side via
> struct thread_data and replaces the on-stack int previously used. The
> default remains sizeof(int) so existing invocations are unchanged.
>
> With --write-size set above PAGE_SIZE the bench drives anon_pipe_write()
> through alloc_page() (or the bulk pre-alloc, if the relevant patch is
> applied), which is what we want when measuring pipe locking and page
> allocation work.
>
> The bench is a ping-pong: both sides call write() before read(), so a
> single write_size payload must fit entirely in the pipe buffer or both
> sides deadlock waiting for the other to drain. Resize the pipe via
> F_SETPIPE_SZ to match write_size (skipped at the sizeof(int) default),
> and error out cleanly when the request exceeds
> /proc/sys/fs/pipe-max-size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Namhyung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-03 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-03 10:35 [PATCH v4] perf bench: add --write-size option to sched pipe Breno Leitao
2026-06-03 23:34 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2026-06-04 13:21 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-04 15:12 ` Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aiC6DA3o4L7mx0S7@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox