From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] perf timechart: Small optimization for backtrace
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2026 16:34:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aiILolfi8MA27v2L@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fU3JO3b+bPYzZd=TKoxDy4xYMgGXVtCZq6W3Lh3LNN8YA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ian,
On Thu, Jun 04, 2026 at 03:38:05PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 2:49 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I found an issue int timechart backtrace handling during the last review.
> > The goal is to reduce unnecessary work in generating backtrace string.
> >
> > v2 changes)
> > * fix memory leaks when backtrace is not used
> > * copy backtrace when it's used twice
>
> Hi Namhyung,
>
> thanks for cleaning this up and the fixes! Running a build of:
> $ make -C tools/perf O=/tmp/perf DEBUG=1
> EXTRA_CFLAGS="-fno-omit-frame-pointer -O0 -g -fsanitize=address" clean
> all
>
> I get an error but the test harness makes it look like the test is
> passing (I added set -x to the test and removed the "> /dev/null
> 2>&1"):
> ```
> $ sudo /tmp/perf/perf test -vv timechart
> 136: perf timechart tests
> 136: perf timechart tests:
> ---- start ----
> test child forked, pid 937043
> + err=0
> ++ mktemp /tmp/__perf_timechart_test.perf.data.XXXXX
> + perfdata=/tmp/__perf_timechart_test.perf.data.cXMvK
> ++ mktemp /tmp/__perf_timechart_test.output.XXXXX.svg
> + output=/tmp/__perf_timechart_test.output.xZXfy.svg
> + trap trap_cleanup EXIT TERM INT
> + perf check feature -q libtraceevent
> + test_timechart
> + echo 'Basic perf timechart test'
> Basic perf timechart test
> + perf timechart record -o /tmp/__perf_timechart_test.perf.data.cXMvK true
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 4.135 MB
> /tmp/__perf_timechart_test.perf.data.cXMvK (748 samples) ]
>
> =================================================================
> ==937049==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
>
> Direct leak of 136 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
> #0 0x7fd211119a23 in calloc
> ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:74
> #1 0x555c44044416 in timechart__record ~/linux/tools/perf/builtin-timech
> art.c:1895
> #2 0x555c44046c19 in cmd_timechart ~/linux/tools/perf/builtin-timechart.
> c:2073
> #3 0x555c440828a4 in run_builtin ~/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:348
> #4 0x555c44082d42 in handle_internal_command ~/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:3
> 98
> #5 0x555c44083110 in run_argv ~/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:442
> #6 0x555c44083667 in main ~/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:549
> #7 0x7fd206e29f76 in __libc_start_call_main
> ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
> #8 0x7fffcf8a352a ([stack]+0x2052a)
>
> Direct leak of 10 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
> #0 0x7fd211113e20 in strdup
> ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cpp:593
> #1 0x555c440444a1 in timechart__record ~/linux/tools/perf/builtin-timech
> art.c:1902
> #2 0x555c44046c19 in cmd_timechart ~/linux/tools/perf/builtin-timechart.
> c:2073
> #3 0x555c440828a4 in run_builtin ~/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:348
> #4 0x555c44082d42 in handle_internal_command ~/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:3
> 98
> #5 0x555c44083110 in run_argv ~/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:442
> #6 0x555c44083667 in main ~/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:549
> #7 0x7fd206e29f76 in __libc_start_call_main
> ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
> #8 0x7fffcf8a352a ([stack]+0x2052a)
>
> Indirect leak of 44 byte(s) in 4 object(s) allocated from:
> #0 0x7fd211113e20 in strdup
> ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cpp:593
> #1 0x555c440445ef in timechart__record ~/linux/tools/perf/builtin-timech
> art.c:1908
> #2 0x555c44046c19 in cmd_timechart ~/linux/tools/perf/builtin-timechart.
> c:2073
> #3 0x555c440828a4 in run_builtin ~/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:348
> #4 0x555c44082d42 in handle_internal_command ~/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:3
> 98
> #5 0x555c44083110 in run_argv ~/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:442
> #6 0x555c44083667 in main ~/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:549
> #7 0x7fd206e29f76 in __libc_start_call_main
> ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
> #8 0x7fffcf8a352a ([stack]+0x2052a)
>
> Indirect leak of 41 byte(s) in 4 object(s) allocated from:
> #0 0x7fd211113e20 in strdup
> ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cpp:593
> #1 0x555c44044696 in timechart__record ~/linux/tools/perf/builtin-timech
> art.c:1911
> #2 0x555c44046c19 in cmd_timechart ~/linux/tools/perf/builtin-timechart.
> c:2073
> #3 0x555c440828a4 in run_builtin ~/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:348
> #4 0x555c44082d42 in handle_internal_command ~/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:3
> 98
> #5 0x555c44083110 in run_argv ~/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:442
> #6 0x555c44083667 in main ~/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:549
> #7 0x7fd206e29f76 in __libc_start_call_main
> ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
> #8 0x7fffcf8a352a ([stack]+0x2052a)
>
> Indirect leak of 11 byte(s) in 4 object(s) allocated from:
> #0 0x7fd211113e20 in strdup
> ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cpp:593
> #1 0x555c440444a1 in timechart__record ~/linux/tools/perf/builtin-timech
> art.c:1902
> #2 0x555c44046c19 in cmd_timechart ~/linux/tools/perf/builtin-timechart.
> c:2073
> #3 0x555c440828a4 in run_builtin ~/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:348
> #4 0x555c44082d42 in handle_internal_command ~/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:3
> 98
> #5 0x555c44083110 in run_argv ~/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:442
> #6 0x555c44083667 in main ~/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:549
> #7 0x7fd206e29f76 in __libc_start_call_main
> ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
> #8 0x7fffcf8a352a ([stack]+0x2052a)
>
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 242 byte(s) leaked in 15 allocation(s).
> + echo 'Basic perf timechart test [Skipped: perf timechart record
> failed (permissions/events?)]'
> Basic perf timechart test [Skipped: perf timechart record failed
> (permissions/events?)]
> + return
> + cleanup
> + rm -f /tmp/__perf_timechart_test.perf.data.cXMvK
> + rm -f /tmp/__perf_timechart_test.output.xZXfy.svg
> + trap - EXIT TERM INT
> + exit 0
> ---- end(0) ----
> 136: perf timechart tests
> : Ok
> ```
>
> It was this test that I was trying to make leak sanitizer clean when
> doing my fixes.
I think these leaks are pre-existing. I don't see where it frees cpu
samples and other events. I'll take a look and send a fix separately.
Thanks,
Namhyung
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-04 23:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-04 21:49 [PATCH v2 0/4] perf timechart: Small optimization for backtrace Namhyung Kim
2026-06-04 21:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf timechart: Don't pass @event to cat_backtrace() Namhyung Kim
2026-06-04 21:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] perf timechart: Generate backtrace only if needed Namhyung Kim
2026-06-04 21:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] perf timechart: Remove unused backtrace in trace_handler Namhyung Kim
2026-06-04 21:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] perf timechart: Remove unnecessary copy of backtrace Namhyung Kim
2026-06-04 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] perf timechart: Small optimization for backtrace Ian Rogers
2026-06-04 23:34 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aiILolfi8MA27v2L@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox