From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB3943D413F; Fri, 5 Jun 2026 23:41:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780702864; cv=none; b=IFlBg1Fmjb78sAHOOdfS/kDRt3F+Xizf56Rndy3+ErL8KJp2NjORFq0ntw85wDh1H0JRQVcXDys21GYAORY54l+voTW8SQpwUoqCyjKLd4tdwm1Aco1acnSD2Maaa4pS4glgwCil4GgmkHIgX30sWGf5piFcAoqq5CX5B85q0KA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780702864; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mmXUwxcXKxpDGBjgR3VkEzMvhczrZGI4t4RU6cLrQ6o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=nFn72krYavziSCBwcZUDN/4qVcW6VyxEfG4ZKlTXWEhwOf9eyafdF4bfKS/CuXE1C6KfDPKrInkHpv+0OD8MJiiCBKFkW29ODsYf0hSPrCymbAcyNOPh8iDvAOV0hC7gg2c9DIsxKlOnFNR8g5sNzNG141yLyVIfIKZMmUKBTWk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=fY8SVya8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="fY8SVya8" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 397E81F00893; Fri, 5 Jun 2026 23:41:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1780702863; bh=zKUZswYyqb3fTkpmDGDuQHCpFg03P5/zTNonPJpsVCs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=fY8SVya8jFYP77kMjtnf2W+vFhe19H9mesXGqOj15TxqbJeClzvJiWeYLv8AgLwL3 SeYzNb4I/52KIjfOgjPPgaiCIW4O/qEI8ZXNcJ7LDIwkbOolhHJSiQVzf5JdHrwSsp U6NS8mUB8NLKKK9eoiSENM02IKKlienOYG+P+xFQkzlV3UZbfipykk3Pw2cuWwTK5M e5B8FRvm4bJMz8e+fsbhrGC8BPBDQYFXTB+BG2LzPCkOq/FTcCvyVlbIigLphHoy7H uYHu3TPDxWihVGc6R+NoeDYvDvJRMOv8t6yLzRrVm1gsgDAwfcuYsVpzEE/szA6uEf QeXck4pvuhn7A== Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2026 20:41:00 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Namhyung Kim Cc: Ian Rogers , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , James Clark , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , LKML , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] perf timechart: Fix memory leaks Message-ID: References: <20260605231155.2415760-1-namhyung@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Jun 05, 2026 at 04:28:13PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote: > On Fri, Jun 05, 2026 at 08:19:13PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 05, 2026 at 04:11:51PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > > This patchset fixes memory leaks in the perf timechart code. > > > I've extended and verified the timechart test with ASAN. > > You submitted a series for timechart before, so I had to go on > > looking if this was a second version or a different series. > Right, this is a different series. I believe they are independent. Thanks for clarifying. > > I suggest you always have a version in the cover letter, i.e.: > > [PATCH v1 0/4] perf timechart: Fix memory leaks > > To avoid this brief distraction :-) > Ok, I'll do that if that helps. :) It is a small detail, not having anything it may have been that the submitter forgot to add something or that it is the first entry, having v1 removes this ambiguity. Thanks, - Arnaldo