Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf tests: Restore -p flag to lock contention test
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 16:41:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ak7gDlPRhIL3MviB@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708175948.567701F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>

On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 05:59:47PM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Medium] Adding the `-p` (pipe) flag to the global workload unconditionally disables the stack filter tests.
> --
> 
> --- Patch [1]: [PATCH v1] perf tests: Restore -p flag to lock contention test ---
> commit b4bb7054950dea7123c601308622ddcd596c94cf
> Author: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> 
> perf tests: Restore -p flag to lock contention test
> 
> This commit restores the -p flag to the perf bench sched messaging workload
> used by the lock contention test. By defaulting to pipes instead of
> socketpairs, it ensures architectures like s390 generate sufficient lock
> events for the BPF trace filtering logic to pass.
> 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/lock_contention.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/lock_contention.sh
> > index ba598370be738..5df9a0cd48a34 100755
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/lock_contention.sh
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/lock_contention.sh
> > @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ errout=$(mktemp /tmp/__perf_test.errout.XXXXX)
> >  
> >  # Workload to generate lock contention.
> >  # Using 1 group (-g 1) keeps runtime low while generating sufficient lock events.
> > -msg_workload="perf bench sched messaging -g 1"
> > +# We include -p (pipes) because socketpairs don't generate enough lock events on s390.
> > +msg_workload="perf bench sched messaging -g 1 -p"
> 
> [Severity: Medium]
> Will adding the -p flag cause test_stack_filter() and 
> test_aggr_task_stack_filter() to unconditionally skip?
> 
> These tests explicitly verify filtering behavior by searching for unix_stream 
> locks in tools/perf/tests/shell/lock_contention.sh:
> 
> test_stack_filter()
> {
> 	echo "Testing perf lock contention --callstack-filter (w/ unix_stream)"
> 	perf lock contention -i ${perfdata} -v -q 2> ${result}
> 	if [ "$(grep -c unix_stream "${result}")" = "0" ]; then
> 		echo "[Skip] Could not find 'unix_stream'"
> 		return
> 	fi
> 
> Since pipes use pipe locks instead of AF_UNIX stream socket locks 
> (unix_stream), the shared perfdata profile will no longer contain these locks. 
> 
> Does this mean we lose test suite coverage for the --callstack-filter option 
> across all architectures because the grep will always return 0?

I think it's a valid concern but it didn't come from this change.
Maybe we need to check different symbols like "pipe_".

Thanks,
Namhyung

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-08 23:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-08 17:53 [PATCH v1] perf tests: Restore -p flag to lock contention test Ian Rogers
2026-07-08 17:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 23:41   ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2026-07-09  5:42 ` Thomas Richter
2026-07-10 21:48 ` Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ak7gDlPRhIL3MviB@google.com \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox