From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF50934DCC7 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2026 23:59:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783123195; cv=none; b=uvVohPPQQLkaAb003R8ysybLzcA3rfw34TwCYw7CN58eRmCbzKcYNmjQRiFDxbBQP15lp5TKUMXDBFjqyU5Gy4uFrcgaVp0zouhFOEKwUhF3tIEwNhKNuIDV3VrWSeACPirvATHGVxpQifS16AB2ZXvU1sK5VXx95HY4vqs0ct4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783123195; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Gn1hssmdik1zphnfMG6D25zjrCctNicnCJm7pRbDlyU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kT+CnqR3OE3cMUpC+f609yZBL7++Fqp6R50IwQ1xlKcShHTFX//3br6OyLTB853D47nJJ5MOJbuu+ZojTUCC1dfii9afZ53IvzUN6aMM5I6M/WM04MOhlU/E4D27jhF8ilDKcw7+i8KhBg5osju5ZD4qgYl4tkCMsLY/Lb4Ookg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=VOtSshoo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="VOtSshoo" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 042B61F000E9; Fri, 3 Jul 2026 23:59:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1783123193; bh=neDxvJLZqydMYExJ0EqIpg5nFmchQ3Fc9GHFErQRroM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=VOtSshooeVOroaoJJmLAj7EQl8rWwHTcwE8RZj7t9eYCwASLt3GnAEzn2EoCxjIct HWRgDNqL4+2EZRUbvKxuLxjMr53ZZNJJemRld6cT3d0M3Ulf4p+fhrk2mvt0hsBizK wV3+4MI8sNLuN9PlXJ1fMTZzBaTOHOStzYRoRsYJ+KtMCRqQE1QZD0WeaFmwxZ07Nb J9ERdleg8J8KpOZBf8dQf+Puqr9cN7YkPFUlA0QccDpuc6HBsEfp4KXlpRhMV9AaCU aQ7SAsegaDT8m60ZnmXJN18QlCllZ0tLT+hPCwVTnUUi3MDAzrBvC9AtC8R816O2vg bMjlizbJ8nHxw== Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2026 16:59:51 -0700 From: Namhyung Kim To: Tanushree Shah Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , jolsa@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com, vmolnaro@redhat.com, mpetlan@redhat.com, tmricht@linux.ibm.com, maddy@linux.ibm.com, irogers@google.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, atrajeev@linux.ibm.com, hbathini@linux.ibm.com, Tejas.Manhas1@ibm.com, Tanushree.Shah@ibm.com, Shivani.Nittor@ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf data convert json: Fix trace_seq memory leak in process_sample_event() Message-ID: References: <20260604065519.112101-1-tshah@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Jul 02, 2026 at 12:46:54PM +0530, Tanushree Shah wrote: > Hi Namhyung, > > Yes, I was planning to send a v2 based on the review comments to fix the > pre-existing issue. > > However, Arnaldo mentioned that the original patch had already been merged > before I got to send a v2, so I addressed the pre-existing issue in a > separate patch instead. The patch is available here: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20260606121528.406919-2-tshah@linux.ibm.com/ > > That said, although Arnaldo mentioned that this patch had been merged, I > don't see it in perf-tools-next yet either. I'll wait for him to clarify its > current status. It's not in the perf-tools-next, and no plan to add it. Please send v2. Thanks, Namhyung