From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
james.clark@linaro.org, howardchu95@gmail.com, neelx@suse.com,
chjohnst@mail.com, sean@ashe.io,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] perf trace: Correct default cpumask formatting to hexadecimal
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2026 22:02:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <al2r_MoSrBkbLAmA@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260719001510.398616-2-atomlin@atomlin.com>
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2026 at 08:15:09PM -0400, Aaron Tomlin wrote:
> Currently, dynamic non-array fields such as 'cpumask_t' are mishandled in
> 'perf trace', causing the raw length and offset descriptors to be interpreted
> and displayed as a literal integer (e.g., "cpumask: 524320" instead of the
> actual mask data).
>
> Correct the parsing of dynamic fields that do not have the
> TEP_FIELD_IS_ARRAY flag set by introducing helper functions
> format_field__get_raw_data() and format_field__get_cpumask().
> Using these helpers, resolve the pointer to the raw bits within the
> payload and format the cpumask as a zero-padded hexadecimal string by default.
>
> Fixes: c5e006cdbd27 ("perf trace: Support tracepoint dynamic char arrays")
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-trace.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/perf/util/evsel.h | 6 +++
> 3 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> index ba0f8749fc7d..f8b8431f9543 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> @@ -3207,6 +3207,21 @@ static void bpf_output__fprintf(struct trace *trace,
> ++trace->nr_events_printed;
> }
>
> +static unsigned char bitmap_byte(const unsigned long *mask, int byte_idx)
> +{
> + unsigned char b_val = 0;
> + int bit_in_byte;
> +
> + for (bit_in_byte = 0; bit_in_byte < 8; bit_in_byte++) {
> + int b_idx = byte_idx * 8 + bit_in_byte;
> + int host_w_idx = b_idx / BITS_PER_LONG;
> + int host_bit_in_word = b_idx % BITS_PER_LONG;
Better to add a blank line.
> + if (mask[host_w_idx] & (1UL << host_bit_in_word))
> + b_val |= (1 << bit_in_byte);
> + }
> + return b_val;
> +}
> +
> static size_t trace__fprintf_tp_fields(struct trace *trace, struct perf_sample *sample,
> struct thread *thread, void *augmented_args, int augmented_args_size)
> {
> @@ -3238,17 +3253,54 @@ static size_t trace__fprintf_tp_fields(struct trace *trace, struct perf_sample *
> syscall_arg.len = 0;
> syscall_arg.fmt = arg;
> if (field->flags & TEP_FIELD_IS_ARRAY) {
> - int offset = field->offset;
> -
> - if (field->flags & TEP_FIELD_IS_DYNAMIC) {
> - offset = format_field__intval(field, sample, evsel->needs_swap);
> - syscall_arg.len = offset >> 16;
> - offset &= 0xffff;
> - if (tep_field_is_relative(field->flags))
> - offset += field->offset + field->size;
> + void *ptr = format_field__get_raw_data(field, sample,
> + evsel->needs_swap,
> + &syscall_arg.len);
> +
> + if (!ptr) {
> + pr_err("Problem processing %s field, skipping...\n", field->name);
> + continue;
> + }
> + val = (uintptr_t)ptr;
> + } else if ((field->flags & TEP_FIELD_IS_DYNAMIC) &&
> + strstr(field->type, "cpumask")) {
> + unsigned long *mask = format_field__get_cpumask(field, sample,
> + evsel->needs_swap,
> + &syscall_arg.len);
> +
> + if (!mask) {
> + pr_err("Problem processing %s field, skipping...\n", field->name);
> + continue;
> }
>
> - val = (uintptr_t)(sample->raw_data + offset);
> + printed += scnprintf(bf + printed, size - printed, "%s", printed ? ", " : "");
> + if (trace->show_arg_names)
> + printed += scnprintf(bf + printed, size - printed, "%s: ", field->name);
> +
> + if (syscall_arg.len == 0) {
> + printed += scnprintf(bf + printed, size - printed, "0");
> + } else {
> + int i;
> + bool skip_zero = true;
> +
> + printed += scnprintf(bf + printed, size - printed, "0x");
> + /* Print bytes from most significant to least significant */
> + for (i = syscall_arg.len - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> + unsigned char b_val = bitmap_byte(mask, i);
> +
> + if (skip_zero && b_val == 0 && i > 0)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (skip_zero) {
> + printed += scnprintf(bf + printed, size - printed, "%x", b_val);
> + skip_zero = false;
> + } else {
> + printed += scnprintf(bf + printed, size - printed, "%02x", b_val);
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + free(mask);
> + continue;
> } else
> val = format_field__intval(field, sample, evsel->needs_swap);
> /*
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index ea9fa04429f0..912d77044141 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -16,9 +16,11 @@
> #include <errno.h>
> #include <inttypes.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <string.h>
>
> #include <dirent.h>
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/bitmap.h>
> #include <linux/compiler.h>
> #include <linux/ctype.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> @@ -3933,6 +3935,94 @@ void *perf_sample__rawptr(struct perf_sample *sample, const char *name)
> return sample->raw_data + offset;
> }
>
> +void *format_field__get_raw_data(struct tep_format_field *field, struct
> + perf_sample *sample, bool needs_swap,
> + u16 *len_out)
> +{
> + int offset = field->offset;
> + int size = field->size;
> +
> + if (field->flags & TEP_FIELD_IS_DYNAMIC) {
> + unsigned int dynamic_data;
> +
> + if (out_of_bounds(field, field->offset, field->size, sample->raw_size))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + dynamic_data = format_field__intval(field, sample, needs_swap);
> +
> + offset = dynamic_data & 0xffff;
> + size = (dynamic_data >> 16) & 0xffff;
> +
> + if (tep_field_is_relative(field->flags))
> + offset += field->offset + field->size;
> + }
> +
> + if (out_of_bounds(field, offset, size, sample->raw_size))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + *len_out = size;
> + return sample->raw_data + offset;
> +}
> +
> +unsigned long *format_field__get_cpumask(struct tep_format_field *field,
> + struct perf_sample *sample,
> + bool needs_swap, u16 *len_out)
> +{
> + u16 len;
> + void *ptr = format_field__get_raw_data(field, sample, needs_swap, &len);
> + unsigned long *mask;
> + struct perf_env *env;
> + bool target_is_64;
> + int target_word_size;
> + int nr_words;
> + int bit_idx;
> + int nbits;
> +
> + if (!ptr)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + nbits = len * 8;
> + mask = bitmap_zalloc(nbits ?: 1);
> + if (!mask)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + env = evsel__env(sample->evsel);
> + target_is_64 = env ? perf_env__kernel_is_64_bit(env) : (sizeof(void *) == 8);
> + target_word_size = target_is_64 ? 8 : 4;
> + nr_words = len / target_word_size;
> +
> + for (bit_idx = 0; bit_idx < nbits; bit_idx++) {
> + int w_idx = bit_idx / (target_word_size * 8);
> + int bit_in_word = bit_idx % (target_word_size * 8);
> + bool set = false;
> +
> + if (w_idx < nr_words) {
Nit: Can you change it to something like below to reduce indentation?
if (w_idx >= nr_words)
break;
Thanks,
Namhyung
> + if (target_is_64) {
> + u64 word;
> + memcpy(&word, (unsigned char *)ptr + w_idx * 8, 8);
> + if (needs_swap)
> + word = bswap_64(word);
> + set = (word & (1ULL << bit_in_word)) != 0;
> + } else {
> + u32 word32;
> + memcpy(&word32, (unsigned char *)ptr + w_idx * 4, 4);
> + if (needs_swap)
> + word32 = bswap_32(word32);
> + set = (word32 & (1U << bit_in_word)) != 0;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (set) {
> + int host_w_idx = bit_idx / BITS_PER_LONG;
> + int host_bit_in_word = bit_idx % BITS_PER_LONG;
> + mask[host_w_idx] |= (1UL << host_bit_in_word);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + *len_out = len;
> + return mask;
> +}
> +
> u64 format_field__intval(struct tep_format_field *field, struct perf_sample *sample,
> bool needs_swap)
> {
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> index 163fc2b6a7ea..02129a022ea3 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> @@ -400,6 +400,12 @@ static inline char *perf_sample__strval(struct perf_sample *sample, const char *
>
> struct tep_format_field;
>
> +void *format_field__get_raw_data(struct tep_format_field *field,
> + struct perf_sample *sample,
> + bool needs_swap, u16 *len_out);
> +unsigned long *format_field__get_cpumask(struct tep_format_field *field,
> + struct perf_sample *sample,
> + bool needs_swap, u16 *len_out);
> u64 format_field__intval(struct tep_format_field *field, struct perf_sample *sample, bool needs_swap);
>
> #ifdef HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT
> --
> 2.54.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 5:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-19 0:15 [PATCH v3 0/2] perf trace: Correct cpumask formatting and add --bitmask-list Aaron Tomlin
2026-07-19 0:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] perf trace: Correct default cpumask formatting to hexadecimal Aaron Tomlin
2026-07-20 5:02 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2026-07-20 16:35 ` Aaron Tomlin
2026-07-19 0:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] perf trace: Add --bitmask-list command-line option Aaron Tomlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=al2r_MoSrBkbLAmA@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
--cc=chjohnst@mail.com \
--cc=howardchu95@gmail.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=neelx@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sean@ashe.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox